Williamson Flashcards
(249 cards)
What are the major pathways by which a signal can enter a cell?
- hydrophobic molecules can diffuse to intracellular receptor
- ion channel
- GPCR
- ligand binds to enz
Why does the plasma membrane provide a big barrier for entering cell?
- not rigid, so hard to induce a switch change
What are koff and kon?
- rate constants
kon
L + R ⇌ LR
koff
What are the actual on/off rates of ligand binding to receptor?
- on = kon [L][R]
- off = koff [LR]
At eq how do on and off rates relate, and how can this be rearranged?
- they are equal
- kon [L][R] = koff [LR]
- so koff / kon = [L][R] / [LR] = Kd (dissoc constant)
What is the diff between k and K?
- k is a rate constant
- K is an eq constant
How is fractional occupancy of ligand on receptor calc?
- [LR] / [R] +[LR]
- ie. fraction bound / total amount of receptor
What can fractional occupancy demonstrate?
- multiply top and bottom by the ratio [L] / [LR]
- [LR] x ( [L] /[LR] )
/ [L][R] / [LR] + [L]
= [L] / Kd + [L] - plot out DIAG
- see need a LOT of ligand to get to almost complete binding
Why is it important how tightly ligand binds receptor, and what conclusion can be drawn from this?
- receptor should get turned on by ligand binding
- if ligand binds v tightly, then background levels of ligand bind
- if ligand binds v weakly, need v high ligand conc
- conclusion: optimal ligand conc is approx Kd for its receptor OR optimal Kd for ligand is close to its physiological conc
- fairly strong Kd means hormone can remain at fairly low conc
When and why is it not a problem if ligand binds receptor weakly?
- in autocrine/paracrine, as signal released so close to target
What is the important consequence of the fact that Kd = koff / kon, and what conclusion does this lead to?
- max poss kon approx 10^8/M/s (diffusion controlled) and often lot slower, assumes right orientation
- more typical kon makes half life (log 2/k) too long
- in general cell needs to actively remove ligand from receptor, can’t wait for dissoc (receptor internalisation) OR deactivate receptor w/ arrestins
Why do neurotransmitters need to be removed v rapidly, and how is this done?
- to clear way for next nerve impulse (5ms)
- ACh removed by acetylcholinesterase
- dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin taken up by transporters
What can inhibitors of dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin treat?
- obesity and ADHD
- prozac is specific inhibitor of serotonin uptake
- but best known uptake inhibitor is cocaine
What is alt way to get stronger binding w/o having v slow dissoc?
- have ligand binding by 2 weak interactions, rather than 1 strong 1
In what instance can 1 ligand turn on a signal?
- ceg. 1 photon can activate rod cell in eye
- therefore signalling pathways often req amplification –> eg. in eye 1 photon leads to approx 10^5 cGMP broken down
- signal activated an enz –> eg. in eye, phosphodiesterase
Generally, why is not good to be so sensitive that 1 ligand can turn on signal?
- binding and activation are random events at mol level, so would lead to random activation (too much or too little)
- proteins not rigid, so can get switched on w/ no ligand at random, or often ligand can bind and not activate it
What does it mean to say that most signalling pathways have threshold level of signal?
- enough signal to lift response clear of noise
- typically cells have 10^4 - 10^6 receptors (usually need sig no. bound for signal to be transmitted)
How do cells ignore ‘random’ signals until large enough to pass threshold and be recognised as signal?
- many incoming signals lead to phosphorylation
- cells have lots of nonspecific phosphatases, which go around dephosphorylating proteins
- higher rate than ‘background’ phosphorylation, so keeps signals turned off until genuine signal arises and swamps phosphatase activity
Does a signal work as a good switch, and why?
- some do, some don’t
- proteins not rigid, so ‘off’ protein could randomly behave ‘on’ 0.1% of time (or often more) and vice versa
How does myoglobin vs Hb show good signal like behaviour?
- DIAG*
- myoglobin = like saturation curve
- Hb = much more switch like
How can proteins become better switches?
- need cooperativity
- means clustering of receptors (into lipid rafts)
- scaffold proteins to bring components together
- add domains to increase colocation
- eg. kinase cascade –> 3 kinases amplifies signal and increases switch like behaviour
Why is Ca an unusual signal?
- 2nd messenger, like cyclic nucleotides
- usually a binary signal (on or off)
- not made or destroyed, just moved –> stored outside cell and in ER, moved into cyto
How does Ca conc vary between cyto and ec space, and what does this mean for signalling?
- in cyto usually <10^-7M (v low)
- in ec space often much higher, around 10^-3M
- signal easy to initiate as influx when open channel, but harder to move out as against quite high conc grad
- so cells work v hard to keep Ca levels low inside cells
What conc does Ca need to reach for signal to be prod?
- increase to approx 10^-6M