Wills Flashcards
When to apply intestacy rules
- no will
- will fails
- will does not dispose of all probate prop
- will specifies intestate distribution
surviving spouse share under intestate succession
- in all states, surviving spouse takes the entire estate if no descendants survive and in most states 1/2 or 1/3 of estate if descendants survive.
- some states and UPC provide for a dollar amount plus 1/2 or 1/3 if descendants survive
- UPC = surviving spouse takes entire estate if all surviving descendants are surviving spouse’s descendants
descendants share not passing to surviving spouse
- majority = per capita with rep
- modern = per capita at each generation
- minority = strict per capita stripes (division always at child level)
in no descendants survive the intestate estate passes
- to parents
- in no parents, to descendants of parents
- if no then to grandparents or their descendants
- if no then divided into maternal and paternal shares and pass to nearest kin
- if no relative capable of taking, the estate passes to the estate (escheat)
special cases of intestate succession
- adopted children = treated same as natural child and cutoff from natural parent
- stepchildren and foster = no inheritance rights unless adopted but may be exception for adoption by estoppel
- posthumous children = child in gestation at decedent’s death inherits as if born in lifetime
- nonmarital children = can inherit from father if: father and mother married after child’s birth, adjudicated father in paternity suit, and after man’s death he is proved to be the father of the child
- siblings of half blood and whole blood inherit equally
disinheritance clause
- majority = ineffective if partial intestacy
2. minority and UPC = given full effect; heir treated as though he had disclaimed his intestate share
simultaneous death
- property of each person passes as though he survived the other person
- applies to probate and nonprobate transfers
- about half of the states have adopted 120 house rule - must survive by 120 hours to take as a beneficiary/heir/etc
- governing instrument can make different provision
disclaimers
- disclaimed property passes as though disclaimant predeceased decedent
- disclaimer must describe the property and must be in writing, signed by the disclaimant, and filed within 9 months
- estoppel of disclaimer if benefits accepted
decedent’s death caused by heir or beneficiary (slayer)
- if one feloniously and intentionally causes death of a decedent, property passes as though killer predeceased decedent
- applies to probate and non probate
- severs joint tenancy
advancements and satisfaction of legacies
- lifetime gift presumptively not advancement of intestate share or in satisfaction of gift under will unless:
- intent is shown by a contemporaneous writing by donor or
- there is a written acknowledgment by the donee
requirements for all wills
- testator age 18 and of sounds mind
- testamentary intent - present intent to make a will
- writing
- signature of testator
requirements for formal attested wills
- age, intent, writing, signature of testator plus…
- two attesting witnesses (or signed by notary under UPC)
-testator must acknowledge will or sign in witnesses’
presence
-witnesses must sign in testator’s presence
-if witness is also a beneficiary, will is valid but gift to
interested witness is purged unless:
a. witness is supernumerary
b. witness would take without the will
c. UPC provision allows interested witness to keep
gift - UPC harmless error; defectively executed will can be given effect if clear and convincing evidence testator intended it to be his will
requirements for holographic wills
- age, intent, writing, signature of testator plus….
- will must be in testator’s handwriting
- witnesses not needed
integration
pages present at execution are part of will if so intended
codicil
- must be executed with same formalities as a ill
- republishes will
- revocation of will revokes codicils; revocation of codicil revokes only codicil
incorporation by reference
- the document must be:
- in existence at time the will was executed
- sufficiently described in the will and
- the will must show intent to incorporate
- signed list of tangible personal property is valid even if made or altered after will’s execution
acts of independent significance
will may identify beneficiaries or property by reference to acts or events that have significance apart from the will
pour over to inter vivos trust
- valid even if trust amended after will execution
2. under uniform testamentary additions to trusts act, trust need not be in existence at will execution
powers of appointment
- general v. special power = general power can be exercised in favor of donee; special cannot
- appointive property not subject to elective share or creditors
- exercise:
- residuary clause does not by itself exercise testamentary power; must mention power
- blanket exercise power permissible
- contract to exercise testamentary power invalid
non probate assets
- cannot be disposed by wil
- includes life insurance, property passing by right of survivorship
- property in trust
revocation by operation of law
- marriage usually has no effect on will, but if there is an omitted spouse statute, the will is revoked to extent of spouses share
- divorce or annulment revokes all provisions in favor of former spouse (and under UPC former spouse’s relatives)
revocation by written instrument
- revoking instrument must be executed with same formalities as will
- inconsistent provisions in later instrument revoke prior ones by implication
revocation by physical act
- burning, tearing, or canceling with intent to revoke
- may partially revoke will
- will not found at testator’s death is resumed revoked
- contents of accidentally lost or destroyed will may be proven
revival or revoked wills
- in majority, destruction of revoking instrument presumptively revives revoked will unless testator did not so intend. will always revived if re executed with formalities or republished by codicil
- dependent relative revocation - a court may disregard revocation if premised on a mistake of law or fact, would not have occurr but for the mistaken belief that another disposition was valid, and the results from disregarding revocation come closer to testator’s intent