Wills Flashcards

(63 cards)

1
Q

choice of law for joint property when married in intestate

A

look at the law of the couple where they were domiciled at the time the property was acquired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

married descedents share

A

if kids: 1/3 or 1/2 (varies by state)

if no kids: the entire estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

per capita with representation (intestate distribution method)

A

first generation recieves a share, next generation splits that share amongst common decedents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

per capita at each generational level

A

pool shares of lower generation, then split into even shares

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

order of decedndency

A

parents
siblings and their decedents
half/half to maternal/praternal gparents
half/half to next of kin on maternal/paternal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

adopted kids and nonmarital kids

A

adopted: treated as biological kids
nonmarital: always from mother, father if mariied after birth, declared father in court, if proved to be father by clear convinincg evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

disinheritance clause

A

upc: good

common law: no, must dispose of all property in will to exclude an intestate recipient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is an advacnement

A

when a beneficicary receives a gift intended by will during life of testator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

procedures for measuring shares

A

the gifts value is added back in to the estate for purppse of calculating shares, and then subtracted from the recipients share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

uniform simulaneous death act

A

so A and B, A’s prperty goes to B’s heirs and B’s proeprty at issue goes to A’s heirs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

disclaiming an inheritance

A

signed writing
notarized
filed in appropriate court
9 months of death of testator

estopped if disclaimer recieved the benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

is a will revocable?

A

revocable during life and operative (self executing) at death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

choice of law for wills

A

real property: where the property situs

personal: domicile of testator at time of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

testamentary capcity

A
must understand:
nature of the act
nautre of their property
beneficiaries/intestates
use this info to form an orderly scheme of dispostion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when is capacity determined

A

at time of will execution (when will is deemed the effective will)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

does being too old mean you lack capacity

A

no, neither beign drunk or on drugs, as long as they meet the four steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

for intent on making will

A

testator must have present intent; no future wills

  1. intent to dispose of property
  2. intent of disposal upon death
  3. intended that will to accomplish disposal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

formalities of will execution

A

vary by state, but generally:

  1. writing (some states allow electronic)
  2. signed by testator (or another in presence of testator)
  3. 2 witnesses
  4. signed in 2 wintesses presecnes (or single notray for UPC)

Some state may add:
sign at the end of the will
publish the will
witnesses sign in presecnce of each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

testators signature

A

any mark works with intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

holographic will

A

entirely in the testators handwriting and no witnesses
testator signed
-most states recognize
-most states recognize handwritten changes after will is completed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

devise

A

gift of rear property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

bequest

A

gift of personal property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

legacy

A

gift of personal proeprty in a will, usually money

legatee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

general legacy

A

general gift of personal property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
demonstartive legacy
general gift to be paid from a specific source pay X from the W trust fund
26
ademption
failure of a gift bc the property no longer belongs to the testator applies only to specifc devise and bequests
27
partial ademption
when a beneficiary takes only part of a devise or bequest bc other part is no longer property of testator
28
ademption by satisfaction
transfering an entire gift to beneficiary inter vivos req writing or specific instruction in most states
29
accessions
increase in property before testator death -income of proeprty: goes to general estate -improvements to real propety: specifc devisee after death -specific devisee
30
exoneration of existing liens on property
states vary, but UPC says liens not provided for by estate unless the will says so (exonerated)
31
abatment
reducing gifts to accoont for all debts/gifts of estate. order of abatment if not already determingd ``` intestate residue general legacy demonstrative legacy specific bequests/devise ```
32
what happens when a gift lapses
beneficiary predeceases the testator
33
anit lapse sattute
close intestate recipeints protected from gift lapsing; will go to thier heirs
34
do wills mean the testator wants to avoid intestacy
yes
35
what if will contradicts
last one prevails
36
extrinsic evidence for will ambiguuity
modern rule: yes for patent ambiguity AND latent ambiguity AND mistake traditional rule: NO for patent ambiguity and mistake YES for latent
37
incorporation by reference
good so long as - will maifests intent to - doc exists at time will executed - doc is sufficeintly described in will
38
codicil
moidifcaiton to a will ``` -must follow same steps for execution: wirting signed two witenss there (or notary) must be in presence of two witness ```
39
can a coidcil incorporate a defective or ineffective will?
yes, can incorporate by refernce
40
must the person probating the will prove integration?
yes, evidence includes - physical attachment - internal cohencsion of docs - orderly plan
41
powers of appointment
A power of appointment is an authority granted to a person, enabling that person (the donee of the power) to designate, within the limits prescribed by the creator of the power, the persons who shall take the property and the manner in which they shall take it.
42
donee of an appontment power
someone who is given the power of appointment
43
can power of appointment pass through will
if it specifically does: yes in a residual clause: varies by jurisdcition, some yes, some no
44
can a person revoke their will
yes, anytime during life
45
marriage follwoing will execution
new rule: new wirfe take intestate interest share as ommitted spouse unless: - will makes provision for new spouse - omission was intnetional OR - will was mad ein contemplation of marriage
46
revocation by phsyical act
burning, tearing, cancelling, obliterating will WITH intent to revoke -intent must be concurrent with act -usually has to be testator -
47
can someone partially revoke will by physcial act
yes, can use exxtrinsic evidcence to decide
48
does revocation of will revoke all codicils
yes BUT revoke of codicil doesnt revoke will
49
revocation by written instrument
- req the same formalities as will execution - can revoke - -expressly - -by inconsistency (complete or partial)
50
if will can't be found or is found in mutilated state AFTER will was last seen in testators control
assumed to be revoked
51
normal assupmtion of revocation of a will?
assumed not revoked unless evidence otherwise or will last in testro possession and sub found destroyed or not found
52
revivial of a revoked will
Under the UPC and in many states, if a will that wholly revoked a previous will is thereafter revoked, the previous will remains revoked unless it is evident from the circumstances or the testator’s statements that the testator intended to revive 8.7.2 Automatic Revival Approach In other states, revival is automatic under the theory that the revoking will did not take effect because it was revoked prior to the testator’s death. 8.7.3 No Revival Approach In some other states, a will, once revoked, is not revived when the subsequent will is itself revoked. The revocation clause is effective when executed just like a revocation by physical act. The earlier will can be revived only if it is re-executed (that is, re-signed and witnessed) or republished by a validly executed codicil.
53
conditional revocation
express or implied
54
implied revocation and doctrine of dependent relattive revocation
The doctrine of dependent relative revocation applies when a testator revokes their will under the mistaken belief that another disposition of their property would be effective, and but for this mistaken belief, the testator would not have revoked the will. If the other disposition fails, the revocation also fails and the will remains in force. To determine whether DRR applies, we ask the following questions: • Was the revocation of Will 1 impliedly conditioned on the validity of Will 2? • Would Testator have preferred Will 1 over intestacy? the more similar the provisions are, more likely to revive the will, and vice versa
55
can spouse elect to take statutory share of estate instead of devised estate by will
yes, if authroized by statute from net estate (after expesnes) with notice
56
homestead, family allowance, exempt personal proerpty
all three usually protected from creditors
57
contesting a will
only interested party has standing time to file varies burden of proof on contestor grounds for contest: defective execution, revocation, lack of capccity, lack of intent, undue influence, fraud, mistake
58
undue influence
The influence existed and was exerted • The effect of the influence was to overpower the mind and free will of the testator (so that the will reflects the desires of the person exerting the influence instead of the testator); and • The resulting testamentary disposition would not have been executed but for the influence (causation)
59
duress
same as undue infleunce but with violence
60
fraud
False representation made to the testator • Knowledge of falsity by person making the statement • The testator reasonably believed the statement • The statement caused the testator to execute a will or make a particular disposition that the testator would not have made but for the misrepresentation
61
mistake in execution of will (works)
In the case of mistake in the execution, the testator is in error regarding the identity or contents of the instrument and thus lacks testamentary intent.
62
mistake in inducement of will (doesn't work)
In the case of mistake in inducement, the testator is mistaken as to some extrinsic fact and makes their will based on that erroneous fact.
63
executor
personal rep to carry out the will ``` notice to devisees discover/collect the assets manage the assets pay expenses of admin distribute property ```