Wills - Sheet1 (1) Flashcards
(115 cards)
1
Q
wills
Capacity
-At the time of execution
A
(1) 18 years old
(2) knowledge of property
(3) knowledge of natural objects of her bounty
(4) nature of her act
-Lowest level of capacity known to the law
2
Q
wills
Consequences of Lack of Capacity
A
(1) ENTIRE will is invalid
(2) Intestate succession or prior will
3
Q
wills
Insane Delusion
-At the time of execution
A
(1) T had false belief
(2) That was a product of a sick mind
(3) No evidence to support belief
(4) Delusion affected T’s will
4
Q
wills
Consequences of Insane Delusion
A
(1) ONLY the PART of the will that was affected is invalid
(2) Residue or, if delusion affected residue, intestate succession
5
Q
wills
4 Concepts of Intent
A
(1) Capacity
(2) Insane Delusion
(3) Fraud
(4) Undue Influence
6
Q
wills
Fraud: Elements
A
(1) Representation
(2) Material fact
(3) Known to be false
(4) Intent to induce
(5) Actual inducement
7
Q
wills
Fraud: Types
A
(1) Inducement
(2) Execution
(3) Preventing Revocation
8
Q
wills
Consequences of Fraud in Execution
A
ENTIRE will is invalid
- T was defrauded into signing/creating the will
- T had NO intent to create a will
9
Q
wills
Consequences of Fraud in Inducement
A
ONLY the PART of the will affected by the fraud is invalid
- Fraud affected the content of T’s will
- T did not intent those terms/individuals to be in his will
10
Q
wills
Remedy for Fraud in the Inducement
A
(1) Residuary
(2) Intestate Succession
(3) Constructive Trust
-Court’s election; Furtherance of justice
11
Q
wills
Consequences of Fraud in Inducement
A
Court will NOT probate the will
Remedy: Constructive Trust for intended beneficiary
12
Q
wills
Undue Influence: Types
A
(1) Prima Facie Case
(2) Presumption
(3) Statutory
13
Q
wills
Elements of Undue Influence: Prima Facie Case
A
(1) Susceptibility of T
(2) Opportunity/Access of B
(3) Active Participation by B
(4) Unnatural Distribution of T’s Will
14
Q
wills
Elements of Undue Influence: Presumption
A
(1) Confidential Relationship (any)
(2) Active Participation by B
(3) Unnatural Distribution of T’s Will
15
Q
wills
Statutory Undue Influence
A
CA invalidates donative transfers to:
(1) Drafter of will
(2) Relative or spouse of the Drafter
(3) Fiduciary who can Transcribe the will (or cause it to be transcribed)
(4) ‘Care Custodian’ of a ‘Dependent Adult’
- 18 and mentally handicapped OR
- 65+
NOTE: Exceptions
16
Q
wills
Statutory Undue Influence: Exceptions
A
(1) B is Related to or Spouse of T
(2) Independent Attorney Reviews
(3) Court determines no wrongdoing
- Clear and convincing evidence
- NOT an exception if Drafter is B
17
Q
wills
Consequences of Undue Influence: ALL
A
ONLY the PART that was affected is invalid
18
Q
wills
Remedy for Undue Influence: ALL
A
Prima Facie Case OR Presumption
(1) Residue
(2) Intestate Succession
(3) Constructive Trust
Statutory
(1) Gift shall not exceed transferee’s intestate share
(2) Remainder goes to Residue OR Intestate Succession
*Court’s Election; Interest of Justice
19
Q
wills
6 Concepts of Mistake
A
(1) Mistake in content
(2) Mistake in execution
(3) Mistake in inducement
(4) Mistake in description (ambiguity)
(5) Mistake in the validity (DRR)
(6) Mistake involving living children
20
Q
wills
Mistake in Content: Remedy
-Wrong Beneficiary or Gift
A
(1) Omission
- Court will not change the will
- Exception: DRR and Omitted Children
(2) Addition
- Court may strike out addition
21
Q
wills
Mistake in Execution: Remedy
A
(1) Signs Wrong Document (e.g., power of attorney)
- No will exists, no intent
(2) Signs Spouse’s Will (Reciprocal Will)
- Reformation, swap H for W (visa versa)
22
Q
wills
Mistake in Inducement: Remedy
-Erroneous Belief (not rising to the level of insane delusion)
A
- No Relief
- UNLESS: Will explicitly states how distribution would have been different but for the mistake
23
Q
wills
Mistake in Description: Remedy
A
(1) Latent
- Allow extrinsic evidence to determine
- CL did no allow extrinsic
(2) Patent
- Allow extrinsic evidence to determine
24
Q
wills
DRR
A
(1) T revokes his will or a portion
(2) in the mistaken belief that
(3) a SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR will or codicil is valid
(4) Revocation of 1st is deemed dependent on #2 being valid
(5) If #2 is invalid, #1 is still in effect
25
# wills
How to probate a lost or destroyed will?
-DRR
ANY witness to the will can testify to its contents
-Need not be the attesting witness
26
# wills
Pretermitted (Omitted) Child: Remedy
(1) Child born AFTER execution of ALL testamentary instruments
- Child deemed ‘Pretermitted’ and takes intestate share
(2) Child born BEFORE execution of testamentary instrument
- Child deemed disinherited and takes nothing
- UNLESS: T did not know of the child’s existence. Then give child intestate share.
27
# wills
5 Concepts of Will Components
(1) Integration
(2) Incorporation by Reference
(3) Facts of Independent Significance
(4) Written disposition of limited tangible personal property
(5) Pour-over wills
28
# wills
Integration: Elements
(1) Intent
- T must have intended to integrate the documents
(2) Presence
- document to be integrated must have been physically present at time T executed his will
NOTE:
Stapled together or sentences that continue that continue from page to page help to establish what is to be integrated
29
# wills
Incorporation by Reference: Elements
(1) Document or Writing
- Need not be valid in its own capacity (e.g., valid K)
(2) Existence
- In existence at time of execution
(3) Clearly Identified in the Will
- Will references the document
(4) Intent to incorporate
NOTE:
Establishing elements 1-3 will infer 4
30
# wills
Facts of Independent Significance
Reference in a will to something that would have existed without the existence of the will is independently significant.
Evidence of that fact will be admitted as parol evidence to clarify the will.
31
# wills
§ 6132: Written Disposition of Limited Tangible Personal Property: Elements
(1) Death after 1/1/07
(2) Writing must be:
- Referenced in the will;
- Dated; AND
- Either signed or handwritten by T
(3) Writing must describe items and beneficiaries w/ reasonable certainty
(4) Tangible personal property (not $) ≥$25,000 total and ≥$5,000 per item
NOTE: The writing may be executed before or after the will
32
# wills
§ 6132: Miscellaneous
- If one of the items to be disposed of exceeds $5,000, ONLY that is excluded from § 6132 and its value is NOT included in the $25,000 total
- If a beneficiary to a § 6132 document predeceases T, the gift LAPSES (not subject to ant-lapse?) unless the writing describes otherwise
33
# wills
Pour-Over Wills
Defined:
Will that devises assets to an inter vivos trustee to be held in trust
Issues:
Who is the beneficiary
Who is the trustee
What are the terms of the trust
34
# wills
How to effectuate a Pour-Over Will
(1) Incorporation by Reference
- go though elements
(2) Acts of Independent Significance
- go though elements
(3) Uniform Testamentary Additions to Trusts Act (UTATA)
- Valid Trust + in Existence at time will is executed = Valid Will
NOTE: Highly unlikely that you will use §6132 (don’t discuss)
35
# wills
3 Concepts of Attested Will
(1) Elements for an attested will
(2) Interested witness problems
(3) Conditional wills
36
# wills
Attested Will: Elements
(1) Written
(2) Signed
- Nickname allowed
- 3rd parson in T’s presence at his direction if T’s is incapacitated
- Conservator pursuant to court
(3) Witness of T’s signature by 2 disinterested witnesses
- Acknowledge signature in presence of witnesses
- Present at the same time
(4) Witnesses sign during T’s life
(5) Witnesses understand what they are signing
37
# wills
’Clear and Convincing’ Exception
To elements 3, 4, and 5 of an attested will
IF:
(1) Death on or after 1/1/09
(2) Clear and Convincing Evidence that
(3) T intended the will to constitution his will
Than:
(1) Witnesses NOT required
However:
(1) Will must be written
(2) T must sign it
38
# wills
Do the witnesses to an attested will have to sign in the presence of anyone?
NO, not the other witness, not T.
It is T who must sign in the presence of BOTH the witness, at the same time.
39
# wills
Failure to Comply w/ Attested Will Formalities:
(1) Death BEFORE 1/1/09
(2) Death AFTER 1/1/09
(1) BEFORE 1/1/09
- Absent Fraud or Mistake
- Argue ‘Substantial Compliance’
(2) AFTER 1/1/09
- Argue above AND
- Clear and Convincing Test
40
# wills
Conscious Presence Test
T signs or acknowledge within the witnesses hearing and the witnesses know what is being done.
-’Within earshot’
41
# wills
What happens if there is an interested witness?
NOTHING IF there are 2 other disinterested witnesses
IF NOT:
(1) There is a presumption of wrongdoing
(2) If not rebutted
(3) Interested witness takes ONLY up to the amount of intestate share
(4) If no intestate share, then nothing
42
# wills
3 Concepts of Holographic Wills
(1) Elements for a valid holographic will
(2) Testamentary intent
(3) Dates
43
# wills
Holographic Will: Elements
(1) Signed by T
(2) Material Provisions in T’s handwriting
- gifts made
- beneficiaries
44
# wills
Holographic Will: Intent
Extrinsic evidence may be admitted to establish the intent of T
- Watch for T simply naming B and gifts
- Watch for a series of documents
45
# wills
Holographic Will: Dates
Dates are NOT required for holographic wills
- Watch for inconsistent wills
- Watch for capacity issues
46
# wills
3 Concepts of Codicils
(1) Definition
(2) Republication
(3) Revocation
47
# wills
Codicil: Defined
Testamentary instrument that complies with probate code formalities and:
(1) modifies;
(2) amends; or
(3) revokes
an existing will
48
# wills
Republication by Codicil
A will’s date becomes that of the most recent codicil.
Important for:
(1) Incorporation by reference (pour-over wills)
(2) Omitted spouse or child
49
# wills
Codicil and Pretermission (omitted child)
- If Child is born AFTER the creation of a will.
- Then Child is Pretermitted
- If codicil is created AFTER birth of Child
- Then there is no pretermission problem for 2 reasons:
(1) Will is ‘republished’ to the date of the codicil
(2) Codicil is a testamentary instrument that came after Child
Discuss BOTH
50
# wills
Revocation by Codicil
(1) Revocation of codicil
- Presumption that ONLY codicil is revoked
(2) Revocation of will
- Presumption that will AND codicils are revoked
51
# wills
4 Concepts of Revocation by Physical Act
(1) Elements
(2) Cancellation and Interlineations
(3) Duplicate Wills
(4) Mutilated Wills
52
# wills
Revocation by Physical Act: Elements
(1) Burned, torn, cancelled, destroyed, or obliterated
(2) Simultaneous INTENT to revoke
(3) Act by T or someone in T’s presence at T’s direction
53
# wills
Revocation by Cancellation and Interlineation
Handwritten Alterations to a:
(1) Typed Will (attested)
(2) Handwritten Will (holographic)
(1) Typed Will (attested)
- Any cancelation (striking out) to the original will is a VALID revocation
- HOWEVER, any handwritten addition is NOT valid b/c not a valid holographic or attested codicil (lack of all material terms)
- BUT if the interlineation gives MORE to B, use DRR to give B the lesser, original, amount
- IF the interlineation gives LESS to B, B gets nothing b/c testator intent
(2) Handwritten Will (holographic)
- Any cancelation (striking out) to the original will is a VALID revocation
- AND, any handwritten addition is also VALID b/c valid holographic codicil
54
# wills
T: ‘I give my farm to A and B.’
If T cancels his distribution to A, does B get the whole farm?
NO
B still gets 1/2
A gets nothing
Residue gets 1/2
55
# wills
Revocation of a duplicate
Revocation of a duplicate will is treated the same as revocation of the original will.
NOTE:
A duplicate ≠ a copy
56
# wills
2 Concepts of Revocation by Subsequent Instrument
(1) Manner of revoking
(2) Revival
57
# wills
Manner of revoking by instrument
(1) Express
- ’I hereby revoke all my prior wills’
(2) Implied
- Distribution of all T’s estate
58
# wills
Revival
Will #1 is revoked by Will #2
Will #2 is revoked by physical act
Is Will #1 Revived?
Will #1 is revived ONLY if T manifested an intent to revive
While tearing up Will #2 T states, ‘Now will #1 is back in effect.’
However, it must be very clear.
59
# wills
Revival
Will #1 is revoked by Will #2
Will #2 is revoked by Codicil
Is Will #1 Revived?
Will #1 is revived ONLY if the the terms of the codicil make it clear that T manifested an intent to revive Will #1
60
# wills
4 Concepts of Revocation by Operation of Law
(1) Omitted Child
(2) Omitted Spouse
(3) Omitted Domestic Partner
(4) Final dissolution of marriage or domestic partnership
61
# wills
Omitted Child: Defined
(1) A child born or adopted
(2) After ALL testamentary instruments
- Will, codicil, or revocable intervivos trust
(3) And NOT provided in any instrument
62
# wills
Omitted Child: Consequences
(1) Receives intestate share
(2) And keeps all assets held in any intervivos trust
EXCEPTIONS
(1) Intentional omission
(2) Most assets go to parent
(3) Outside instrument
63
# wills
Omitted Spouse: Defined
(1) A surviving spouse who married T
(2) After ALL testamentary instruments
- Will, codicil, or revocable intervivos trust
(3) And NOT provided in any instrument
64
# wills
Omitted Spouse: Consequences
(1) Receives intestate share
(2) And keeps all assets held in any intervivos trust
EXCEPTIONS
(1) Intentional omission
(2) Outside instrument
(3) Valid Pre/Post Nuptial
65
# wills
Valid Pre/Post Nuptial
(1) Writing
(2) Signed
(3) Full Disclosure of Finances
(4) Independent Counsel
If No Counsel
(1) Knew or should have known of finances;
OR
(2) Fair
EXCEPTION
-Never enforceable if UNCONSCIONABLE
66
# wills
Does legal separation revoke testamentary devises?
NO
ONLY Divorce or Termination of Domestic Partnership
67
# wills
When does divorce NOT revoke a devise?
(1) Remarries
OR
(2) Expressly stated in devise
68
# wills
4 Concepts of Ademption
(1) Classification
(2) Ademption by Extinction
(3) Ademption by Satisfaction
(4) Advancements
69
# wills
Classifications of Gifts
(1) Specific
(2) General
(3) Demonstrative (hybrid)
(4) Residue
70
# wills
What types adeem by extinction?
ONLY
Specific Gifts
71
# wills
Ademption by Extinction
Common Law:
-If specific gift was not in T’s estate at death, it failed (adeemed)
California:
-Look to T’s intent
NOTE:
If there is ambiguity as to whether the gift is specific or general, courts will avoid the harsh result of ademption by extinction, which only applies to specific gifts, and will consider the gift general, and allow alternate distribution.
72
# wills
Ademption by Extinction: Tracing
If a specific gift is sold during T’s lifetime and the proceeds can be directly traced into another asset or an account, make a tracing argument.
73
# wills
Ademption by Extinction: General v. Specific
Because ONLY specific gifts adeem, make an argument that a gift is general.
74
# wills
Ademption by Satisfaction: 4 ways to prove
If T gave B part of B’s gift during T’s lifetime, B’s gift will be reduced IF:
(1) Will provides for a deduction of intervivos gifts
(2) T declares in a contemporaneous writing
(3) B acknowledges in a writing
(4) Specific gift was given
75
# wills
Advancements: 2 ways to prove
If Intestate gave Heir part of B’s intestate share during Intestate’s lifetime, Heir’s intestate share will be reduced IF:
(1) Intestate declares in a contemporaneous writing
(2) Heir acknowledges in a writing
76
# wills
Ademption by Satisfaction
v.
Advancement
(1) Ademption by Satisfaction
- Applies to Wills
- If B predeceases T, B’s issue lose out on the devise
(2) Advancement
- Applies to intestate succession
- If heir-apparent predeceases Intestate, HA’s issue do NOT lose out on their intestate share
77
# wills
4 Concepts of Contracts Affecting Wills
(1) Requirements
(2) When the COA accrues
(3) Joint and Mutual Wills
(4) Remedies Available to Promisee
78
# wills
K Not to Revoke a Will: Alternative Methods of Creation
(1) Will states the material provisions of the K
(2) Will makes express reference to the K
(3) Writing signed by T evidencing the K
(4) Clear and convincing evidence of agreement that is enforceable in equity
79
# wills
K Affecting a Will: When does a COA accrue?
When T dies
UNLESS:
(1) T engaged in fraud; and
(2) Irreparable injury would result
- Injunction
80
# wills
Does the creation of a Joint or Mutual Will create a presumption of a contract not to revoke?
NO
However, extrinsic evidence may be admitted to establish a K not to revoke.
81
# wills
What is the remedy for the breach of a K affecting a will?
(1) Damages against T’s estate
(2) Specific Performance
(3) Constructive trust
-All K remedies
82
# wills
3 Concepts of Restrictions on Dispositions
(1) Types of Property
(2) Spousal/Domestic Partner Protection
(3) Unworthy Heirs/Beneficiaries
83
# wills
Classification of a Married Person’s Property
(1) CP
(2) SP
(3) QCP
84
# wills
How does the definition for QCP differ between:
(1) Divorce
(2) Probate
(1) Divorce
- All real property wherever located
(2) Probate
- Real property located in CA
Therefore, the acquiring spouse can dispose of ALL real ‘QCP’ that is not located within CA.
85
# wills
Until the acquiring spouse DIES, the NON-acquiring spouse has merely an expectancy interest, NOT a property interest, in QCP. Therefore...
if the NON-acquiring spouse predeceases the acquiring spouse, the non-acquiring spouse CANNOT dispose of any QCP.
86
# wills
How can property be devised via testamentary instrument if:
(1) SP
(2) CP
(3) QCP
(1) SP
100%
(2) CP
50%
(3) QCP
50% by acquiring spouse
0% by non-acquiring spouse
87
# wills
Widows Election Will
If T attempts to dispose of more than 1/2 of the CP or QCP the surviving spouse may elect to:
(1) Take under the will
(2) Take against the will
88
# wills
Determining whether an Heirs/Beneficiaries has killed T.
(1) Conviction is conclusive
(2) Probate court will determine by preponderance
89
# wills
Consequences of determining a FELONIOUS and INTENTIONAL killing
(1) by B/Heir of T/I
(2) by JT of other JT
(3) by B of Insured
(1) by B/Heir of T/I
- Killer does not take
- Issue do not take (anti-lapse not applicable)
(2) by JT of other JT
- Killer keeps 1/2 interest
- Killer does not take other 1/2 (no right of survivorship)
(3) by B of Insured
- Killer does not take
90
# wills
6 Concepts of Intestate Succession
(1) Surviving spouse
(2) All others
(3) Per Capita/Per Stirpes
(4) Adopted Children
(5) Non-Marital Children
(6) Half-Bloods
91
# wills
Intestate Share of Surviving Spouse:
(1) CP/QCP
100%
(2) SP
- 100% if decedent had no issue, parent, B/S, or N/N
- 50% if decedent left parent, B/S, or N/N
- 50% if decedent had 1 issue or issue of 1 issue
- 33% if decedent had 2+ issue or issue of 2+ issue
92
# wills
Intestacy Chart for Non-Married Decedents
(1) Issue
(2) Parents
(3) Issue of Parents
(4) Grand-Parents
(5) Issue of Grand-Parents
...
Don’t worry about the rest
93
# wills
Distribution of Intestate Share
Per Capita w/ Representation
v.
Strict Per Stirpes
(1) Per Capita w/ Representation
- Go to first generational line w/ living heirs
- Give proportional share to all living and deceased w/ issue
- Issue of deceased share deceased proportional share
(2) Strict Per Stirpes
- Go to first generational line w/ living heirs OR deceased w/ issue
- Give proportional share to all living and deceased w/ issue
- Issue of deceased share deceased proportional share
94
# wills
Adopted Children, 1/2 Bloods, and Non-Marital Children
ALL are treated the same as true children.
NOTE:
Stepchildren and Foster Children require analysis
95
# wills
Step and Foster Children Will Take An Intestate Share IF:
(1) The relationship began at the child’s minority
(2) Continued throughout the parent’s lifetime
(3) Would have adopted BUT FOR legal barrier
- Clear and Convincing Evidence
- E.g., bio parent would not consent
96
# wills
Equitable Adoption
A non-child will take if
Parties hold themselves out as parent/child
97
# wills
3 Concepts of Who Can Take
(1) Posthumous Children
(2) Lapse and Anti-Lapse
(3) Simultaneous Death
98
# wills
Right to Inherit: Posthumous Children
Take EXACTLY the same as children
- Conceived before T’s death
- Born after T’s Death
99
# wills
Anti-Lapse
A gift to B will not fail (lapse) if B predeceased T if...
(1) B was kindred to T;
OR
(2) B was kindred to T’s surviving, deceased or former spouse
AND
(3) B leaves issue
100
# wills
Does anti-lapse apply if B was the spouse?
NO.
The Spouse is NOT kindred.
101
# wills
Does Anti-Lapse apply to class gifts?
YES.
Therefore, if a class member is kindred (e.g., grandchildren), and the class member predeceases T and leaves issue, the issue will take.
102
# wills
Simultaneous Death:
(1) Wills
(2) Intestacy
(3) Joint Tenancy
(4) Life Insurance Policy
(1) Wills
- Clear and convincing evidence that
- B survive T by ANY amount of time
(2) Intestacy
- Clear and convincing evidence that
- Heir survive Intestate by at least 120 hours
(3) Joint Tenancy
- Clear and convincing evidence that
- JT survive other JT by ANY amount of time
(4) Life Insurance Policy
- Clear and convincing evidence that
- B survive Insured by ANY amount of time
If NOT, (for all), B/Heir/JT is deemed to have predeceased.
103
# wills
5 Concepts of What a B Takes
(1) After Acquired Property
(2) Increases During T’s Life
(3) Increases After T’s Life
(4) Abatement
(5) Exoneration
104
# wills
After Acquired Property
Property acquired after T executes his will
-All property of T will be disposed of via T’s will, regardless of when acquired.
105
# wills
Increases in Value During T’s Life:
Stock Dividends & Splits
Increases go to B if the increase was due to an action of the corporation and NOT an independent action of T.
106
# wills
Increases in Value After T’s Life:
Stocks, Rents, and Interest
B entitled to increases, splits, rents, stock dividends, etc.
UNLESS
- General Gift of $ (e.g., B gets $10k)
- Unless it takes more than 1 year to get B his money.
107
# wills
Order of Abatement for:
(1) Omitted Spouse or Child
(2) Debt
(1) Omitted Spouse or Child
1st property not passing via instrument
2nd equally taken from ALL B’s
-unless abating from specific gift is against T’s obvious intent
(2) Debt
1st property not passing via instrument
2nd residue
3rd general gifts to non-relatives
4th general gifts to relatives
5th specific gifts to non-relatives
6th specific gifts to relatives
108
# wills
Exoneration
Must funds from the estate be used to extinguish debt on property before it passes?
CL: YES, if T was personally liable
CA: NO, unless VERY specifically directed
109
# wills
Gifts Causa Mortis: Elements
(1) Gift made in contemplation of IMMANENT death.
(2) Personal Property
(3) Delivery (actual, symbolic, or constructive)
(4) If Donor Survives, gift is REVOKED
110
# wills
What is not ‘tangible personal property’ for purposes of §6132 (incorporation by reference of after created document)
(1) Cash
(2) Stock
(2) IP (c)
111
# wills
What presumption arises against an interested witness?
(present at the signing of T)
(1) duress;
(2) menace;
(3) fraud; and
(4) undue influence
112
# wills
If there is an external document, one not contained w/i the will, that you seek to probate, what 4 analyses should you use?
(1) Integration
(2) Incorporation by reference
- §6132 variation
(3) Acts of independent significance
(4) Codicil
113
# wills
If you see ‘Null and Void’ written across a testamentary instrument, what 2 analyses should you use?
(1) Revocation by Physical Act- Cancellation
(2) Holographic Codicil
- handwritten
- signed
114
# wills
Will the revocation of a codicil that revoked a disposition in a prior will REVIVE that prior disposition?
CL- YES
Modernly- Look to the intent of T
115
# wills
’My shares of stock’
Specific or General Gift?
Almost always considered specific
Therefore, subject to ademption by extinction.
