Witnesses Flashcards

(53 cards)

1
Q

When may a court excuse a witness?

A

If the probative value of their testimony is outweighed by unfair prejudice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a Dead Man’s statute?

A

A state statute that excludes evidence of a conversation between a dead man and a witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the scope of evidence that a lay v. expert witness can provide?

A

Layman: Must have first hand knowledge

Expert: Personal knowledge is not required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who cannot testify in a case?

A
  1. The presiding judge may not testify in the trial

And

  1. A juror may NOT testify as a witness before the jury of which he is a member.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What must a witness do to qualify to testify?

A

A witness must declare to testify truthfully by oath or affirmation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is an interpreter qualified?

A

The same way as an expert and must take an oath or affirmation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What may a juror testify to?

A
  1. Extraneous prejudicial information improperly brought to the juror’s attention
  2. Whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear on any juror

Or

  1. Clerical/secretarial error (mistakes on the verdict form).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What can a juror not testify on?

A
  1. Any statements made during deliberations
  2. Thought processes

or

  1. Votes taken during the verdict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List examples of when a juror’s testimony will be excluded when challenging a verdict.

A
  1. Juror misunderstood the evidence or the instructions.
  2. The jury reached its verdict improperly (drawing straws or quotient verdict)
  3. The jurors drank alcohol and smoked marijuana during deliberations
  4. One juror physically bullied another regarding his vote
  5. Juror fell asleep during deliberations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who may impeach a witness?

A

The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party, including the party calling him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a collateral matter?

A

Evidence solely affecting the credibility of a witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three arguments commonly advanced in an impeachment?

A
  1. The witness is a liar
  2. The witness is mistaken
  3. The witness is biased.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the limits to cross examining a witness about a collateral matter?

A

Whatever the question, the party bound by the witnesses answer. Extrinsic evidence on a collateral matter is inadmissible to impeach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When is extrinsic evidence on a collateral matters admissible?

A

It is always inadmissible to impeach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the methods of witness impeachment?

A

Provide evidence of:

  1. Bias or Prejudice
  2. Sensory Defects
  3. Prior Inconsistent Statements
  4. Bad Character of Witness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the credibility issues do the limits of collateral matters not apply to?

A
  1. Bias or prejudice impeachment
  2. Sensory defects
  3. Character for untruthfulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are examples of bias or prejudice evidence?

A
  1. Family
  2. Business relationships
  3. Confidential Informants
  4. Fee Arrangement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When can sensory defects be used for impeachment?

A

Inability to observe, communicate, or remember is always relevant and never a collateral matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the four ways to impeach character of a witness?

A
  1. Reputation or opinion
  2. Bad acts
  3. Felony convictions in general
  4. Specific convictions of crimes involving dishonesty or false statement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How can a witness’s character for untruthfulness be attacked?

A
  1. Extrinsic Reputation or opinion evidence: either party may call a witness in both civil and criminal cases. The extrinsic witness is able testify as to witnesses reputation for truthfulness in the community.
  2. Cross-examining the witness about specific acts (fraud, perjury) which reflect on his character for truthfulness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When can a witness’s character for truthfulness can be shown by reputation or opinion evidence?

A

Only when the witness’s character for truthfulness has been attacked.

Cannot bolster a witness’s character in advance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the limitations on the bad act impeachment of a witnesses?

A

Can only be brought about by:

  1. A question on cross-examination
  2. About prior unconvicted acts bearing on (un)truthfulness (or dishonesty). The party is stuck with the answer.
23
Q

Bad Act impeachment cannot be?

A

Too remote in time or based on rumors.

24
Q

When can impeachment by evidence of a criminal conviction be introduced?

A

In all cases to for all witnesses.

25
What are the **categories** **admissible** **impeachment** evidence of **criminal conviction**?
1. Felonies: punishable by death or imprisonment over 1 year 2. Crimes involving dishonesty or false statement
26
When will **evidence of a felony** for a witness other than the accused be **excluded**?
Excluded if the probative value is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice pursuant to the 403 balancing test.
27
When will **evidence of a felony** for a witness other than the accused be **admitted**?
The prosecution shows the probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect.
28
When will **evidence of convictio**n of a crime involving **dishonesty** or **false statement** be **admitted**?
It is a matter of right, there is no balancing It if it happened within the last 10 years. Examples: Perjury Forgery Larceny by Trick Tax Evasion Fraud False Pretenses ≠ Assault, Drug cases, Theft, Prostitution
29
What is the 10 year rule? What is its exception?
Convictions more than 10 years old are inadmissible to impeach unless the probative value substantially outweighs the prejudicial effect. If so, notice of introduction must be given to the opponent.
30
How the **10 years** in the 10 year rule **measured**?
Measured from whichever is more recent: 1. The date of conviction Or 2. The date of release from confinement.
31
What is the **admissibility** of a **juvenile conviction** to impeach?
1. Inadmissible against the accused 2. Admissible against all other witnesses
32
What is the **admissibility** of using **arrest records**, indictments, and other charges to **impeach** a witness?
They are all inadmissible
33
Can **guilty pleas** be used to **impeach** a witness?
Yes
34
Can **suppressed** **evidence** be used to **impeach** a witness?
Cannot be used at trial but can be used a **sentencing**.
35
How can a ∆ **prevent prior convictions** from coming into evidence?
Not testifying
36
Can party ask a character witness if his opinion would change if he knew defendant was guilty?
No
37
Can evidence of a **witness's religious beliefs** be used for **impeachment**?
It cannot use to bolster or tear down a witness.
38
Can **jurors** **ask questions** of witnesses?
Yes, in Federal court.
39
When are **leading** questions **not allowed**?
1. Generally not on direct 2. When the examiner and the witness are on the same side
40
In what circumstances may **leading questions** be **appropriate** on **direct** examination?
1. Hostile witness 2. Adverse witness (when not on the same side) 3. Child witness 4. Introducing preliminary background information 5. To refresh recollection.
41
The **scope** of **cross-examination** is limited to?
1. The scope of direct examination And 2. Matters affecting credibility
42
What are the **elements** to **refresh/jog** a witness's **memory**?
1. The witness cannot remember an event 2. On direct 2. Can use anything: writing, photograph, further questioning, or other form of evidence to refresh 3. If they are refreshed, the witness can keep testifying. The refreshing evidence ≠ introduced into evidence.
43
What can the **adverse** party do when an **opponent refreshes/jogs** a witness's memory? What about when **privileged material** is used to **refresh**?
The adverse party 1. May inspect the refreshing material 2. Cross-examine with it 3. Show writing to the jury for comparison with witness's testimony An 4. Introduce relevant portions into evidence only for impeachment. If privileged, then waiver of the privilege has occurred when it is used to refresh.
44
What are the **procedural steps** for **refreshing** a witness?
1. Give a copy to the judge and opposing counsel. 2. Mark it as an exhibit for identification only. 3. Ask witness to silently read the document. 4. Take back the writing. 5. Ask witness to testify independently of the writing.
45
What is the difference between a **present memory refresh** and **past recollection recorded**?
Present Memory Refresh: Intrinsic evidence used to testify Past Recollection Recorded: Extrinsic evidence admitted into evidence.
46
What is a **prior inconsistent** statement to **impeach**?
A statement that is: 1. Not sworn 2. Oral or written 3. Contents need not be shown to witness (on request must be shown to opposing side) 4. Used with the intention to impeach.
47
When is **extrinsic evidence** of a **prior inconsistent** statement by a witness may be **admissible**?
1. The witness is afforded an opportunity to explain or deny at some point 2. Opposing counsel is afforded an opportunity to interrogate the sponsoring witness (the witness that could testify to the prior inconsistent statement).
48
What is the **consequence** if a witness **denies** making a **prior inconsistent** statement? If witness **admits** making a **prior inconsistent** statement?
If the witness denies: extrinsic evidence is generally admissible to impeach. If the witness admits: the witness has the right to explain his answer.
49
If a **prior statement** was **not** given **under oath**, it can only be used for?
Impeachment
50
Can the **court call witnesses**?
Yes, parties get to examine witnesses called by the court
51
Can the **court question witnesses**?
Yes, any witness called
52
When does **sequestration** of **witnesses** **occur**?
At the request of a party, the court shall remove witnesses from the courtroom so they do not hear other's testimony. The following cannot be excluded: 1. Party 2. Essential witnesses 3. Witnesses exempted by statute.
53
If a court **fails** to **sequester** a **witness**, what is the **remedy**?
Moving for a mistrial.