year 2 (p1-44) Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

what are case studies?

A

in depth research on a single person or small group,
may use several forms of data,
psychologist produces a description of the case followed by an interpretation of the findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

three advantages of case studies

A

provide in-depth detailed information,
longitudinal research- can see how behaviours develops,
acknowledges the importance of individual experiences, thoughts and feelings - better understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

five disadvantages of case studies

A
results can’t be generalised,
may not be reliable (recall distorted),
time consuming,
cause and effect can’t be inferred,
ethical issues: confidentiality (people identifiable), could lead to psychological harm (embarrassed)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a correlational study?

A

the analysis of the relationship between two co-variables,

no manipulation of the variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

four advantages of correlations

A

they measure the strength and direction of a correlation,
no manipulation of variables so useful when practically or ethically not possible to manipulate variables,
may discover a link between two existing variables,
used if psychologists are interested in relationship rather than an explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

two disadvantages of correlations

A

no manipulation of variables- impossible to establish cause and effect between two variables, can only suggest relationship.
variables have to be quantified to be measured- can affect the construct validity of the findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a correlation coefficient?

A

a number between-1 and +1 that represents the direction and strength of a relationship between co-variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

a value of +1 represents a ___ ___ correlation

A

perfect positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

a value of -1 represents a ___ ___ correlation

A

perfect negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the closer the coefficient is to +1 or -1, the ___ the relationship is

A

stronger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the closer the coefficient is to zero, the ___ the relationship is

A

weaker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

if the correlations coefficient is 0 there is …

A

no correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

which way do the dots of a graph go if the correlation coefficient is positive?

A

bottom left to top right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

which way do the dots of a graph go if the correlation coefficient is negative?

A

top left to bottom left

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

three differences between a correlation and an experiment

A

experiment: establishes cause and effect vs correlation: establishes a relationship,
experiment: has IV vs correlation: no IV,
experiment: high degree of control vs correlation: no control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what for of research is content analysis?

A

observational research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what kind of data does content analysis analyse and what does it turn this data into?

A

turns qualitative data into quantitative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is coding in content analysis?

A

when the researcher places qualitative data into categories ’coding units’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

list the 5 steps in the procedure for content analysis

A
  1. data is collected - e.g. tv adverts
  2. researcher reads through or examine the data - e.g. stereo typing
  3. researcher identifies coding units - males = jobs, females = home
  4. data is analysed by applying the coding units - watch adverts again
  5. a tally is made of the number of times that coding unit appears
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

six advantages of content analysis

A

inexpensive and easy to use,
fewer ethical issues - ppts aren’t involved,
high ecological validity- based on real life,
clear summary of patterns,
replicable to check reliability,
allows statistical analysis to be conducted

21
Q

four disadvantages of content analysis

A

analysing data can be time consuming,
an individual’s judgment/ interpretation can be subject- reduces validity,
cause and effect can’t be established cos it only describes the data,
removes detail when data is put into coding units

22
Q

name the most frequently used form of qualitative analysis

A

thematic analysis

23
Q

what is thematic analysis?

A

making a summery of data and identifying key themes (any idea that is recurrent)

24
Q

what is reliability?

A

how consistent or dependable a test is,

a reliability test carried out exactly the same as should give the same results

25
how can you check the external reliability of a test?
test-retest
26
what is test-retest?
repeat the test using the same ppts, a reliable test should produce a high positive correlation between two scores
27
what problems might observational research have?
observers interpretation of events - subjectivity, bias and unreliability
28
what can be used to fight individual interpretation of observations?
inter-observer reliability
29
what is inter-observer reliability?
more that one observers watch same event and record their data independently. the spectate scores produced are assessed by correlating them
30
if behaviours categories were ___ this would make it easier to identify when a specific behaviour occurs
operationalised
31
what two statistical tests can be used to calculate a correlation coefficient for test retest reliability or inter observer reliability?
spearman’s RHO correlation or pearson’s product moment correlation
32
what must the correlation coefficient be for data to be judged reliable?
+0.8 or above
33
how can the researcher improve reliability in observations?
making sure the behavioural characteristics have been properly operationalised and measurable. no overlap of categories
34
if the correlation coefficient in questionnaires reliability is below +0.8, what should the researcher do to get it up to +0.8?
question may have to be deselected or rewritten as they may be ambiguous, (closed questions are less ambiguous)
35
what can be done to make interviews more reliable?
same interviewer each time, structured interviews insure less leading or ambiguous questions
36
how can reliability in experiments be improved?
strict standardisation and control of procedures (easiest in lab experiments)
37
what is validity?
is if a test is measuring what it is supposed to measure
38
studies that are reliable can be not valid. true or false
true | e.g. a broken set of scales would show the same weight each time but they are broken so the results are not valid
39
what is internal validity?
whether the effects observed in a study are due to the manipulation of the independent variable and not some other factors e.g. demand characteristics
40
what is external validity?
factors outside the investigations | e.g. are results generalisable
41
name two types of external validity?
ecological validity | temporal validity
42
what is ecological validly?
generalising the findings from a study to other settings | e.g. everyday life
43
what is temporal validity?
whether findings from a particular study, or theory, hold true over time
44
what is face validity?
whether a test/ measure/ scale appears to measure what it is supposed to measure.
45
what is concurrent validity?
when the results obtained of a particular test/scale are very close to/ match, those of another recognised and well-established test.
46
how is validity improved in experiments?
the use of control groups - able to assess whether changes is FV were due to effects of the IV or some confounding factors. standardisation of procedures and randomisation- minimises effects of ppt reactivity and experimenter bias
47
how is validity improved in questionnaires?
lie scale witching the questions to assess consistency of responses. anonymous results
48
how is validity improved in qualitative research?
triangulation (use of different sources as evidence)
49
what is interpretive validity?
the extent to which the researchers interpretation of events matches that of the ppt