Youth Subcultures Flashcards
(116 cards)
define spectacular subcultures:
spectacular subcultures can be defined as highly visible subcultures, mainly studied at Birmingham University
explain Rastafarians:
- associated with Jamaican/caribbean culture, reggae music and dreadlocks
- smoking marijuana is associated with Rastas and seen as part of their religion (helps them reach a higher level of spirituality)
what did HEBDIGE say about Rastas?
- he saw this culture as forms of resistance to white culture and racism with roots in slavery
- many were attracted to Britain as it offered a positive identity and opposition to racism they experienced
explain Brasians:
- fusion between asian/british culture
- young British asians refuse to accept a subordinate place in society, and want to celebrate their culture by making it more fashionable
what does JOHAL say about brasians?
- he says some brasians adopted a “hyper-ethnic” style and exaggerated their parents culture (watching hindi films, listening to asian music)
- this gave them “empowerment through difference”
- however, issues like religion/diet may lead to brasians being selective on what they want to follow
- known as “code switching”, where they move from one culture to another depending on what they saw as most appropriate
are brasians resistance or hybridity?
- although Rastas are resistance, brasians show more hybridity by blending aspects of their parent’s culture with British popular culture
- however, by hanging onto some of their traditional culture, this could be seen as a form of resistance (as they’re resisting to assimilate into white British culture)
what does MERCER stay about hairstyles?
- spoke about the styling of hair within black culture and its symbolic meaning
- afro/dreadlocks part of black ID (resistance)
- straightened hairstyles imitating white culture (integrating)
- however, MERCER says this is a very simple explanation, all hairstyles can be forms of hybridity
explain ethnocentric sociologists:
a criticism of functionalists, feminists and the CCCS is that they don’t consider the impact of race/ethnicity on youth subcultures
what does HEBDIGE say about ethnocentric sociologists?
- there is a clear relationship between black styles of dress, music and dance, but this isn’t explored any further
- therefore, sociologists are accused of being ethnocentric
- studies in the US have been less “white focused” and considered hip hop and gangsta rap as subcultures
- however, these studies were done by black sociologists
explain white wannabes: (hybrid sc)
- NAYAK identified “white wannabes”, young wc males who adopt the style/language of black culture
- listen to hip hop, wear lots of bling and dress in a style associated with black males
- example: Ali G
explain modern primitives: (hybrid sc)
- subculture found in us/Western Europe, often described as a Neo tribe
- wide but loose membership, focus more on individuality
- have body modifications (tattoos) as a way of expression
what do VALE+JUNO say about modern primitives? (hybrid sc)
- these body modifications are a reaction to the sense of powerlessness created by living in a fast changing world, as it gives a sense of power and control can be regained
explain cultural exchange and appropriation (hybrid sc)
- hybridity in youth sc can be seen as positive, leading to more understanding between different ethnic groups
- can be seen as a form of cultural exchange
- however, can also be viewed as negative
- taking aspects of other ethnic cultures into white sc is a form of “cultural appropriation”
- example: tattoo’s/piercing in modern primitives
- popularity of chinese letters/dreadlocks criticised as forms of exploitation and disrespect
what does HUTNYK say about cultural exchange/appropriation? (hybrid sc)
- western sc may strip the meaning from symbols and use them in a superficial way
- idea of “cultural exchange” suggests a 2 way process, but is it actually one sided?
- for example, it could be said aspects of British culture have been imposed onto other cultures, whereas aspects of other cultures have been taken by British subcultures without any “exchange” taking place
how do the new right explain deviant subcultures?
- youths in deviant subcultures haven’t received the correct socialisation to accept the value consensus held by the majority of society
- they’re seen to have different, deviant n+v
- MURRAY says the underclass don’t want to work and depend on the welfare system, seeing it as an acceptable lifestyle choice
- in MURRAY’S analysis, the entire underclass can be seen as a deviant sc, but it is particularly among youth through gangs and anti-school sc
what does MURRAY state about single parent families and their impact on deviant ys?
- boys growing up w/o fathers can explain high crime rates of male youths in deprived areas
- they grow up unsocialised, have poor impulse control and become sexual predators
- girls w/o fathers can be emotionally damaged, and search for a father substitute, leading to getting pregnant early
- growing up in a single parent family is more damaging and a greater indicator of criminality than poverty
how can MURRAY/new right theory be criticised?
- victim blaming: MURRAY blames people for their own poverty when it’s not always an individual’s choice to live of state benefits (could be illness, lack of jobs)
- not all from the underclass have a lazy work ethic: many want to work, but the opportunity isn’t there
- not all who live in poverty turn to crime
explain BECKER’S labelling theory: (interactionist)
- labelling relates to power: if you have power, you have the ability to make a label stick
- e.g. young people labelling police has little to no effect, yet police labelling youths has an effect (leads to stop/searches, more arrests)
- leads to “self fulfilling prophecy”
- e.g. young male constantly labelled by police, accept he’s deviant so more likely to make choices that get him into trouble, so living up to the deviant label
explain CICOUREL’S study: social organisation of juvenile justice (interactionist)
- carried out obvs with police/CJS in 2 US cities, found the process of dealing with potential deviants had 3 stages:
1. stop and search based on behaviour being “suspicious”
2. arrest person depending on their appearance/behaviour towards police
3. probation officer has a picture of the “typical delinquent”, sees if they fit that profile - he linked the effect of behaviour to social class: if someone is polite and apologetic, no further action may be taken
- he says “justice can be negotiated”
- the 2 cities were similar in $ background + population, yet 1 city had constant high juvenile delinquency rates, the other fluctuated on media publicity/public concern
- therefore, delinquents are constructed by the agencies of social control, and therefore socially constructed
how can we evaluate interactionist explanations on ds?
by using labelling and the concept of self fulfilling prophecy to explain youth deviance, they assume the label comes first, so they don’t explain why some youth commit deviant acts before they’re labelled and why others don’t
why do marxists/neo marxists believe youth subcultures form?
- CCCS take a Neo-marxist approach, and tended to focus on social class and the $ situation faced by young people
- despite looking/dressing differently, the members of these subcultures still faced the same experiences/social issues, e.g. high unemployment and racial tension
- sc can be seen as a form of resistance against the ruling class and the $ system youths are in
how can we evaluate the marxist/neo marxist view?
- they were finding meanings that didn’t actually exist (were looking for examples relating to class so interpreted sc in this way, when youths may just have been having fun)
- feminists challenge CCCS for ignoring girls
- MCROBBIE+GARBER were part of CCCS, but as feminists they challenged their findings and did their own studies
- middle class had ignored sc (hippies), so could be argued the CCCS chose sc to fit their findings
- majority of youths don’t belong to sc, so were only studying a visible minority
- dated, as today’s youth is different
explain club cultures: (pm)
- researched by Manchester institute of popular culture
- no clear gender, class or ethnic differences can be found amongst clubbers
- the research emphasises the role of the media as an important part of club cultures
- REDHEAD states sc are formed within the media and the media drives sc, not the other way around like the CCCS argued
explain neo tribes (pm)
- MAFFESOLI used this term to refer to a loosely organised group with no fixed membership or commitment
- group ID’s no longer formed along traditional social lines (e.g. class), instead youths flit from tribe to tribe, dabbling in different aspects (clothes/music) then moving on
- tribes not exclusive, group is used to satisfy individual needs
- BENNET supports this by researching nightclubs in Newcastle, finding neo tribes based around fashion/lifestyle but with with no shared values
- e.g. clubbing is multidimensional, as clubbers move between rooms and engage in different crowds