Zimbardo Flashcards

1
Q

What is the name of Zimbardo’s Experiment?

A

Stanford Prison Experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did his experiment test?

A

Conformity to Social Roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did he carry this out?

A

He set up a mock prison in the basement of the psychology department at Sandford University.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the volunteers recruited and how were they re-payed?

A

Advertised in newspaper articles and were payed £15 a day.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many candidates were used, what were they and what were they tested for?

A

21 male student volunteers who were tested as emotionally stable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How were they assigned their roles?

A

Randomly-either prisoner or guard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Through which two aspects were guards encouraged to conform to social roles?

A

Uniforms and Instructions about behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did uniforms encourage conformation to social roles?

A

-Prisoners were in a lose smock, cap and were identified by a number.
-Guards uniform reflected the status of their role.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the uniforms create for the volunteers?

A

A loss of identity (de-individualisation) meaning they would be more likely to conform to their social role.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did Instructions about behaviour encourage conformation to social roles?

A

-Guards were reminded that they had complete power over the prisoners in their role.
-Prisoners could ‘apply for parole’ instead of leaving early.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Zimbardo find out about the guards conformity to social roles?

A

-They were enthusiastic, accepted their social roles quickly and they easily adapted.
-Within hours, some guards began to harass prisoners and treat them badly.
-Guards used ‘divide and rule’ tactics.
-As prisoners become more obedient- guards became more aggressive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Zimbardo find out about the prisoners conformity to social roles?

3 points

A

-Within 2 days, majority of prisoners rebelled-began to shout and swear, and ripped their uniforms.
-They soon acquired expected ‘prisoner-like’ behaviour.
-As prisoners become more obedient- guards became more aggressive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When did the experiment end and how long was it due to last for?

A

Ended after 6 days although originally planned for 14 days.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Zimbardo conclude?

A

-Social roles have a strong influence on individuals behaviour.
-Psychological damage to both parties.
-Institutions may brutalise people and result in deindividualization for guards and prisoners.
-Power may also corrupt those who use it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the one strength of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

A

Control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation: Control

A

Zimbardo and colleagues had control over key variables.
-Selection of pps-individual personality differences are ruled out as an explanation of findings.
-Increased internal validity.

17
Q

What are two limitations of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

A

-Lack of Realism
-Exaggeration

18
Q

Evaluation: Lack of Realism

A

Didn’t have the realism of a true prison.
-Psychologists argued pps were acting rather than conforming. Performances based on stereotypes which would explain the behaviour of some of the prisoners and guards.

19
Q

Evaluation: Exaggeration

A

-Zimbardo overstated his view that SPE participants were conforming to social roles and minimised the influence of dispositional factors.

20
Q

What is an Alternative Explanation?

A

Zimbardo’s explanation for both parties behaviour was conforming to a social role which comes ‘naturally’ and easily.

21
Q

Who criticised Zimbardo’s alternative explanation and why?

A

Steve Reicher and Alex Haslam criticised his explanation as it doesn’t account for the behaviour of the non-brutal guards. Used SLT to argue that the guards had to actively identify with their social roles to act as they did.