1. Learning theory Flashcards
define learning
a process by which experience produces a relatively enduring change in an organism’s behaviour or capabilities
in which 2 ways can learning be classified?
- overt (behavioural) 2. covert (cognitive)
what are the basic learning processes?
- non-associative learning: response to repeated stimuli -
- classical conditioning: learning the association between events and what they signal -
- operant conditioning: learning one thing leads to another (consequences) -
- observational learning: learning from others (imitational)
what are habituation and sensitisation?
habituation - a decrease in the strength of a response to a repeated stimulus sensitisation - an increase in the strength of response to a repeated stimulus
what are the different categories of classical conditioning?
STIMULI - unconditioned stimulus (UCS): a stimulus that elicits a reflexive or innate response (the UCR) without prior learning (a neutral stimulus)
- conditioned stimulus (CS): a stimulus that, through association with an UCS, comes to elicit a conditioned response similar to the original UCR
RESPONSES - unconditioned response (UCR): a reflexive or innate response that is elicited by a stimulus (the UCS) without prior learning -
conditioned response (CR): a response elicited by a conditioned stimulus

what does the Pavlov’s dogs experiment show?
- the CS (bell) led to no response - the UCS (food) led to an innate response - over time if the bell was paired with the food enough, the dogs would salivate from hearing the bell (CS)

when is classical conditioning strongest?
- there are repeated CS-UCS pairings (reinforcement)
- the UCS is more intense
- the sequence involves forward pairings (CS –> UCS)
- the time interval between the CS and UCS is short
how is a response extinguished?
as long as pairings exist behaviours are relatively stable after a while if the CS (e.g. bell) is presented alone without the UCS (food) the strength of the response (salivation) reduces, though never fully disappears
What is extinction?
Spontaneous recovery
Stimulus generalisation
Discrimination
Higher-order conditioning?
Stimulus generalisation : a tendency to respond to stimuli that are similar, but not identical, to a conditioned stimulus this is exploited in advertising and branding - similar stimuli will elicit the CR but in a weaker form
Extinction: A process in which the CS is presented repeatedly in the absence of the UCS, causing the CR to weaken and eventually disappear
Spontaneous recovery: The reappearance of a previously extinguished CR after a rest period and without new learning trials
Stimulus generalisation: Stimuli similar to the initial CS elicit a CR. For example, salivation may be elicited by a bell or a piano tone
Discrimination: A CR occurs in the presence of one stimulus but not others. For example, salivation may not be elicited by a whistle
Higher-order conditioning: Occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes a CS after being paired with an already established CS
Produces a CR that is weaker and extinguishes more rapidly than the original CR
how may classical conditioning occur in chemotherapy patients?
- 25-30% of patients experience anticipatory nausea/vomiting - chemotherapy (UCS) –> nausea (UCR) - related cues (e.g. sight of unit) –> anticipatory nausea (CR)
what was tested to find out the anticipatory immune decline of chemotherapy patients?
- blood samples were taken at home and at the hospital prior to chemotherapy - patients rated their feelings of nausea and their NK cell activity was measured in response to mitogens - patients felt more nauseous in hospital and had lower immune function suggesting classical conditioning can have both a physiological and psychological response
how can the CS of the chemo unit be changed for chemo patients?
- patients experiencing anticipatory nausea were divided into 2 groups - one group was given an unpleasant drink. the other water - patients given the unpleasant drink showed a significantly reduced anticipatory nausea when coming to the clinic because the CS had been altered to respond to the drink
describe the ‘little albert’ experiment by john watson
- a child would play with a white rat without it evoking any response - a CS of a loud noise was introduced during interaction which evoked fear in the child after a few pairings - the experiment was repeated with other objects and strong fear was evoked in response to the rabbit, dog and coat (CR)
what is the 2-factor theory of maintenance of classically conditioned associations?
trauma (UCS) and needles (CS) –> fear (UCR) avoiding injections –> fear reduced –> tendency to avoid is reinforced (negative reinforcement) this is operant conditioning
what is thorndike’s law of effect?
a response followed by a satisfying consequence will be more likely to occur a response followed by an aversive consequence will become less likely to occur
What is operant conditioning?
what is positive reinforcement?
what is negative reinforcement?
occurs when a response is strengthened by the subsequent presentation of a reinforcer POSITIVE = presentation of stimulus
Positive presence of a stimulus
Negative absence of a stimulus
Reinforcement increases behavior
Punishment decreases behavior
Escape removes a stimulus
Avoidance prevents a stimulus

what are primary and secondary reinforcers?
primary reinforcers: those needed for survival (e.g. food, water, sleep, sex) secondary reinforcers: stimuli that acquire reinforcing properties through their association with primary reinforcers (e.g. money, praise)
what is negative reinforcement?
occurs when a response is strengthened by the removal/avoidance of an aversive stimulus NEGATIVE = removal of stimulus
what is positive punishment?
occurs when a response is weakened by the presentation of a stimulus (e.g. squirting a cat with water when it poos inside)
what is negative punishment?
occurs when a response is weakened by the removal of a stimulus (e.g. phone confiscated)
which has more of an influence out of reinforcers and punishers and why?
reinforcers punishment can only make certain responses less frequent, you can’t teach new behaviour
what is operant extinction?
the weakening and eventual disappearance of a response because it is no longer reinforced
what is resistance to extinction?
the degree to which non-reinforced responses persist
what was discovered about reinforcement schedules?
continuous reinforcement produces more rapid learning than partial reinforcement (the association is easier to understand) however continuously reinforced responses extinguish faster that partially reinforced responses because the shift to no reinforcement is sudden and easier to understand
