Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology > Research Methods > Flashcards

Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

Correlation coefficient

A

Correlation is ranked 1 to -1. Stronger correlation is + or -0.8 or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Difference between experiments and correlations

A
  • it’s not possible to establish cause and effect using correlation
  • it’s an association not a cause
  • there may be an association between canine and sleep but there’ll be other variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Advantages of interviews (structured and unstructured)

A
  • replication is easy (structured)

- can elaborate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Weaknesses of interview (structured and unstructured)

A
  • cannot elaborate (structured)
  • very time consuming
  • social desirability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Structured interview

A
  • predetermined set of questions that are asked in a fixed order
  • conducted in real time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Unstructured interview

A
  • conversational-no set questions
  • general aims are discussed and interaction is free flowing
  • interviewee is encouraged to expand answers if prompted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Content analysis

A
  • qualitative data
  • analysed as typologies, quotations and summaries
  • hypotheses are grounded in the data
  • coding units are identified and number of times code appears is counted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Process of content analysis

A
  • representative sample collected
  • coding units identified
  • see how often code appears
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Advantages of content analysis

A
  • clear summary of data is established

- reliable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Disadvantages of content analysis

A
  • can be subjective

- reducing coding units removes detail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages of mean

A
  • representative of all data

- takes into account distances between values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Weaknesses of mean

A
  • anomaly’s may distort data

- can’t be used with nominal data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantage and disadvantage of mode

A

+ unaffected by extreme values

- often multiple modes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Advantages of median

A
  • easy to calculate

- unaffected by anomaly’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Weaknesses of median

A
  • less sensitive as median

- doesn’t reflect exact values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Advantage and disadvantage of range

A

+ easy to calculate

  • affected by extreme values
  • doesn’t take into account distribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Advantage and disadvantage of standard deviation

A

+ precise measure of distribution

- may hide some characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Qualitative data

A

Non-numerical values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Quantitative data

A

Numerical values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Questionnaires

A
  • open: no fixed range of answers, qualitative data

- closed: fixed number of responses, quantitative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Advantages of questionnaires

A
  • cost effective
  • can gather large data
  • easy analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Disadvantages of questionnaires

A
  • response bias/untruthful

- answer the desirable answer rather than their own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Social desirability

A

When a person answers what they believe to be desirable rather than what they believe to be right. This affects validity as data collected will support assumptions when really it may not have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Case studies

A
  • in depth, detailed analysis of an individual, group or event. Qualitative data. Longitudinal
  • Freud’s little Hans was a case study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Advantages of case studies

A
  • detailed insights that might shed light on unusual and atypical behaviour
  • contributed to our understanding of normal functioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Weaknesses of case studies

A
  • cannot generalise
  • subjective selection and interpretation of the researcher
  • low validity
  • inaccuracy and memory decay
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Question asking in an interview (don’t)

A
  • overuse of jargon
  • emotional leading questions
  • double barrel questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Thematic analysis

A

Involves making summaries of data and identifying key themes and categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Advantages of thematic analysis

A
  • qualitative analysis

- clearing hypothesis during analysis allows for new insights to develop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Disadvantages of thematic analysis

A
  • how to decide categories

- subjective decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Role of peer review

A
  • involves all aspects of psychological research being scrutinised by a small group of 2-3 experts in a particular field
  • peers should be objective and unknown to researchers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Aims of peer review

A
  • allocate research funding
  • validates the quality and relevance of research
  • suggest amendments or improvements
33
Q

Anonymity

A
  • the peer should remain anonymous to maintain honesty

- some reviewers use this to criticise rival researcher to gain better funding

34
Q

Publication bias

A
  • there is a tendency for editors to publish headline grabbing research so may create a false impression of the current state of psychology if editors are selective
  • ground breaking research is buried as reviewers will approve more research that fits current research rather than innovative research
35
Q

Reporting psychological investigations

A
  • title-should say what the study is about and include IV and DV ‘s
  • content page
  • abstract-concise summary of the report
  • introduction-should review general area of investigation
  • procedure-recipe style list of what happened
  • results
  • conclusions
  • references
36
Q

Hypothesis

A

A testable statement used to carry out research

37
Q

Correlational analysis (+ and -)

A

Two variables having a demonstrated relationship
+ can be used when an experiment is unethical
- no cause and effect established

38
Q

Aim

A

A statement of a study’s purpose

39
Q

Independent variable

A

Thing that is changed e.g. different groups/conditions

40
Q

Dependent variable

A

Thing that is measured/will be affected by changes

41
Q

Operationalisation

A

How we are going to measure the variables e.g. after drinking red bull, more words are dais than after drinking water

42
Q

Randomisation

A

The use of chance in order to control for the effects of bias when designing materials and deciding the order of conditions

43
Q

Standardisation

A

All participants should be subjected to the same environment, information and experience including the same instructions

44
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Anything that impacts dependent variable but isn’t independent variable

45
Q

Confounding variables

A

Changes systematically with the IV. In some circumstances we might end up with extra IV that is unintentional therefore we are unsure weather DV is the source of change

46
Q

Ethics

A

Consideration of what is acceptable or right behaviour in the pursuit of a personal or scientific goal

47
Q

Informed consent

A

Knowing aims and giving your permission to take part in the study

48
Q

Deception

A

Deliberately misleading or withholding information. If there is spring scientific justification for research, deception is acceptable

49
Q

Right to withdraw

A

All participants are able to leave when desired

50
Q

Confidentiality

A

Details of participants and research should be kept private

51
Q

Debrief

A

Returns the participant to the state they were in before the research

52
Q

Independent groups (+ and -)

A

Each participant takes part in one condition
+ no order effects-no boredom or practice
+ fewer demand characteristics
- more participants needed
- individual differences as some are just worse at tasks

53
Q

Repeated measures (+ and -)

A

Each participant takes part in both conditions
+ no individual differences as the same person does both conditions
- order effects
- demand characteristics-participants know what experiments expect

54
Q

Matched pairs

A 
Use of independent measures but each participant in group A is measured with one from group B
\+ no order effects 
\+ controls for individual differences 
- costly in money and time 
- difficult to make perfect matches
55
Q

Demand characteristics

A

Any cue from the researcher or from the research situation that may be interpreted by the participants as revealing the purpose of the research outcome. Participants may look for cues of how to behave in an experiment

56
Q

Double blind trial

A

Neither participants or researcher are aware of aims of investigation

57
Q

Single blind trial

A

Participants are unaware of conditions they are in. Attempts to control for the confounding effects of demand characteristics

58
Q

Quasi experiment

A

The IV is a naturally existing characteristics between people and has nor been changed by anyone or anything e.g. gender, eye colour etc

59
Q

Advantages and disadvantages of quasi experiments

A

+ often carried out under lab conditions
+ enables psychologists to study ‘real’ problems
- participants cannot be randomly allocated to conditions therefore may be confounding variables
- this means we cannot say cause and effect

60
Q

Naturalistic observation (+ and -)

A

Studying behaviour in a natural setting where everything has been left as it is normally
+ high external/ecological validity
+ natural environment so generalisable to real life
- replication is difficult
- uncontrolled extraneous variables

61
Q

Behavioural categories

A

Devising a set of componente behaviours/checklists

62
Q

Event sampling

A

Counting the number of times a certain behaviour occurs in a rather individual/individuals

63
Q

Time sampling

A

Recording behaviours in a given time frame e.g. niticijhnwhay an individual is doing every 30 seconds

64
Q

Controlled observation (+ and -)

A

When the researcher has some measure of control over the environment e.g. zimbardo, bobo doll
+ easy to replicate
+ control over extraneous variables
- cannot be applied to real life
- may be subjective towards what researcher wants to see

65
Q

Covert observation (+ and -)

A

The participants are not aware that they are being observed
+ less ethical issues as no deception
- may be demand characteristics as they know they are being observed

66
Q

Overt observation (+ and -)

A

The participants are aware that they are being observed
+ no demand characteristics
- ethical issues as they do not know they are being observed

67
Q

Participant observation (+ and -)

A

The observer acts as part of the group being watched
+ increased validity
- ethical issues
- difficulty in recoding observations

68
Q

Non participant observation (+ and -)

A

The experimenter does not become part of the group being observed
+ more ethical and objective
- lower validity

69
Q

Investigator effects

A

Any effect of the investigators behaviour on the research outcome. Coolican (2006) ‘expectancy effects unconscious cues’

70
Q

Pilot studies

A

A small scale verisions of an investigation that takes place before the real investigation is conducted. The Siam is to check they the procedures, materials, measuring scales works nd to allow the research to make changes if necessary

71
Q

Random sampling (+ and -)

A

Each participant has an equal chance of selection
+ each participant has equal chance of selection
- sample may not be representative

72
Q

Volunteer sample (+ and -)

A

People volunteer to take part in sample
+ quick condiment and ethical
- sample is biased as participants are likely to be motivated

73
Q

Opportunity sample (+ and -)

A

People who are participating and available at the time
+ easiest and fastest method
- biased as sample is small
- unlikely to be representative

74
Q

Types of consent

A
  • presumptive consent
  • prior general consent
  • retrospective consent
  • informed consent
75
Q

Researcher bias

A

When the researcher skews the entire process towards a specific research outcome by introducing a systematic error into the sample data

76
Q

Nominal Data

A
  • data represented in the form of categories ‘how many students drive to school, how many walk etc’
  • discrete
  • one item can only appear in one category
77
Q

Ordinal data

A
  • data which is ordered in some way ‘ask everyone in class how much they like 6th form on a scale of 1-10’
  • does not have equal intervals between each unit. Someone who rated an 8 enjoys it twice as much as someone who rated it 4
  • lacks precision and is subjective
78
Q

Interval data

A

Based in numerical scales that include units of equal, precisely defined size. Measurement for height, time and temperature

Psychology (11 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions