1.2 The cosmological Argument Flashcards

(45 cards)

1
Q

What is the cosmological argument?

A

A collection of arguments concerned with finding an explanation for the universe. Asks why the universe exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is natural theory?

A

the CA is an argument form natural theory
Humans do not know God through reason , but through the work of God in creation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of argument is the CA?

A

A posteriori

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some reasons to support the CA?

A
  • Its a posteriori so we have experience of the world
  • It uses logic and evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some reasons not to support the CA?

A
  • How do we know whether God is the cause of the universe?
  • Just because things on earth are cused, how do we know that the universe is caused?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the CA articulated by Aristotle?

A

He separated the prime mover from the material universe, arguing that it couldnt fit in the ordinary chain of physical, material causes.

God couldnt possibly exist within our universe, he must be outside of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the cosmological argument articulated by al-Kindi and al-Ghazali?

A

Premise 1) Whatever comes into being must have a cause

Premise 2) the universe came into being

Premise 3) the universe must have a cause

Premise 4) if the universe has a cause it must have been God

Conclusion God exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the CA articulated by William Lane Craig?

A

Premise 1) if something has a finite past its existence has been caused

Premise 2)The uiverse has a finite past

Premise 3) Space and time originated with the universe and also have a finite past- the cause of the universe must be beyond time and space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does Craig accept the theory of infinity?

A
  • He thinks that the concept of infinity is illogical
  • ‘Infinity is a concept in your mind’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the infinite hotel paradox?

A

David Hilbert imagines a hypothetical hotel with rooms numbered 1, 2, 3, and so on with no upper limit. This is called a countably infinite number of rooms. Initially every room is occupied, and yet new visitors arrive, each expecting their own room. A normal, finite hotel could not accommodate new guests once every room is full. However, it can be shown that the existing guests and newcomers — even an infinite number of them — can each have their own room in the infinite hotel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who was Thomas Aquinas?

A

An italian priest and philosopher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Thomas Aquinasfirst way for the CA?

A

Argument from MOTION
* Nothing can move itself
* An infinite chain of movers that has no beginning cannnot have no successive or ultimate movers
conc: there must be a first mover, we call this God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Thomas Aquinassecond way for the CA?

A

Argument from CAUSE
* things in the world are caused
* Nothing can be its own cause
* there cannot be an infinite chain of causes
* there must be a first cause
conc: God is the first cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Are the first and second ways of Aquinas’ CA effective?

A

No
* The theory of evolution gives and explanation for why things change
* Why does the first cause have to be the GOCT?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Thomas AquinasThird way for the CA?

A

Argument from CONTINGENCY
* Everything is dependent on factors beyond itself (contingent), they could always not exist
* Contingent beings can only be explained by contingent beings
* Contingent beings need an ultimate explanation as a necessary being- God

Contingent=children have been cause by their parents, but might ont have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is Aquinas’ third way of the CA effective?

A

YES
* It’s a posteriori, which draws from evidence
* Swinburne uses occam’s razor- God is the simplest explanation

NO
* Does it complement scientific theories?
* The argument doesn’t explain why God doesn’t need an explanation

Occam’s razor= the simplest answer is often the correct one e.g God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Who was Gottfried Liebniz?

A

A German mathematician who was a well respected enlightenment thinker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Did Liebniz accept the idea of an infinite universe?

A

No he said there must be a cause for a whole universe which explains the whole universe

The cause for the universe must also explainit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the principle of sufficient reason?

A
  • Everything on earth has something that explains its existence
  • There has to be a sufficient reason that explains the cause of any event even the universe
20
Q

What is infinite regress?

A

A never-ending sequence or chain of causes that goes back forever with no starting point

21
Q

Did Liebniz accept infinite regression?

A

He rejected an infinite universe because he didnt believe it was a satisfactory explanation for its existence

He accepted God as the uncaused cause

22
Q

What is the principal of Sufficient Reason?

A
  • Everything on earth has something that explains its existence
  • There has to be suffiecient reason- an adequate reason that explains the cause of any event
    Liebniz rejected an infinited universe because he didn’t believe it was a satisfactory explanation for its existence- he accepted God as the uncased cause
23
Q

What is infinite regress?

A

A never ending sequence or chain of causes that goes back forever with no starting point

24
Q

What are some strengths of the cosmological argument?

A
  1. Inductive a posteriori argument - observations of our world seem to support Aquinas’ argument
  2. By not arguing for a christian God Aquinas makes his argument simpler and nore straight foward to prove
  3. Complements scientific arguments such as the Big Bang theory (uses empirical evidence)
  4. Uses Occam’s razor
25
Who was **Frederick Copleston** and what was his argument?
* He was a **priest and philosopher** and his argument was from **contingency**
26
What is the argument from **contingency**?
An eternal series of **contingent beings** could not bring about its **own existence** or explain how they came into being It would have been impossible for anything to have begun to exist and thus **nothing would be in existence**, **God is a necesary being**
27
What was **John Hick's** argument?
From **contingency**
28
Who is **Richard Swinburne** and what was his argument?
A english philosopher who argued **for** the existence of God. **Occam's razor**
29
What is the outline of **Occam's razor**?
The explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is usually **correct** (the **simplest** one) Applied to the CA: It's more likely that there would be **nothing rather than something**. So **God is the simplest explanation**
30
What are some **weaknesses** of the Cosmological Argument?
* Inductive arguments are only **probable**: doesnt provide certainty of God'sexistence * The universe could just be **infinite** (why cant there be infinite regression?) * We don't have any **direct experience** of the **creation** of the universe
31
Who is **Richard Dawkins** and what does he believe?
An atheist Scientific view: objects offering mythological explanations, we must **'do better science'**
32
Who was **Bertrand Russle** and what does he believe?
A british philosopher: **Fallacy of composition**: we mistakenly give properties of **parts** of the whole to the **whole** ## Footnote Its a mistake to say objects within the universe were created so the universe was created
33
What did **David Hume** believe about the CA?
As we have **no direct experience** of the **creation** of universes we cannot speak meaningfully about the **creation of the universe**
34
What did **Kant** believe about the CA?
Argued that the idea that everything must have a **first cause only applied to the world of sense and experience**. It cannot apply to something we **haven't experienced**.
35
What is the **principal of sufficient reason**?
Everything on earth has something that **explains its existence** There has to be a **sufficient reason** that explains the **cause** of any event, even the universe
36
What is **infinite regress**?
A **never ending** sequence or **chain of causes** that goes back forever with **no starting point**
37
What are the **strengths** of the CA?
1. **Inductive, a posteriori argument**- observations of our world seem to support Aquinas' argument 2. By not arguing for a Christian God aquinas makes his argument **simpler** and more **straight foward** 3. **Complements scientific arguments** like the Big Bang (using **empirical evidence**) 4. **Occam's razor**
38
Who was **Frederick Copleston** and what did he believe?
A priest and philosopher **Argument from contingency**: **An eternal series of contingent beings **could not bring about its **own existence** or explain how they came into being
39
Who was **John Hick** and what did he believe?
American philosopher **Argument from contingency**: It would have been** impossible for anything to have begun to exist** and thus **nothing would be in existence**, God is a necessary being
40
Who is **Richard Swinburne** and what does be believe?
English philosopher **Occam's Razor**: it is more likely that there would be **nothing rather than something**, so the universe needs an **explanation**. **God** is the simplest explanation
41
What are **weaknesses** of the CA?
1. inductive arguments are only ever **probable**- don't provide **certainty** of God's existence 2. The universe could just be **infinite** (why can't there be infinite regression?)- Russle 3. We don't have any **direct experience** of the **creation** of the Universe- Hume
42
Who is **Richard Dawkins** and what does he believe?
Athiest **Scientific view**: He objects to offering mythological explanations, we must '**do better science**'
43
Who was **Bertrand Russle** and what did he believe?
British philosopher **Fallacy of composition**: We mistakenly give **properties** of **parts of the whole to the whole** ## Footnote Its a mistake to say 'objects within the universe were created. Therefore the universe was created'
44
What did **Davide Hume** believe?
As we have **no direct experience** of the **creation** of universes we cannot speak meaningfully about the **creation of the universe** He criticises the **POSR** as those who seek complete universes seek something that **doesn't exist** Asks why we have to conclude that the universe had a **beginning**, and if it did it **doesn't** mean that anything **caused it**
45
What did **Immanuel Kant** believe?
Argued that the idea that **everything must have a first cause, only applied to the world of sense and experience**. It cannot apply to the creation as we did not experience it.