Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

RS RRC Philosophy > 2.2 Influence of religious experience as an Argument for the Existence of God > Flashcards

2.2 Influence of religious experience as an Argument for the Existence of God Flashcards

1
Q

What is an inductive Argument with regards to RE?

A

P1) experience of x indicates the reality of x
P2) God has been experienced
P3) The experience of God indicates the reality of God
conc) God exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a cumulative Argument?

A

The view that if one takes all the arguments for the existence of God, they are more compelling than one alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the opposition for an inductive argument regarding RE?

A

P1) The experience of x does not always indicate the reality of x
P2) If our experience of the empirical is only probable then our experience of the non-empirical is even less probable
Conc) conculsion depends on an accurate interpretation of the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the opposition for the cumulative argument regarding RE?

A

Several weak arguments put together do not make a strong one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who came up with the principle of credulity?

A

Richard Swinburne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the principle of credulity?

A

in the absence of special considerations we ought to belive things are as they seem to be, untile we have evidence that we’re mistaken

Uses Occam’s Razor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are special considerations for the principle of credulity?

A

The subject has:
- taken drugs
- is starving
- suffering with heat exhaustion
-mentally ill
- been hit on the head

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who came up with the principle of testimony?

A

Richard Swinburne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the principal of testimony?

A

In absence of special considerations, experiences of other are probable and should be treated as such

We trust people’s everyday testimonies so why should testimony of RE be any different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the existence of God explain the results of RE?

A

If something is real and true it is more likely to improve a person’s life
Those who claim they’ve had a RE are more fulfilled and purposeful

-William James

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does the quantity of religious experience support the existence of God?

A

If we take all examples of RE together, then they are more convincing than one alone- weight of testimony

James: variety of different RE in different places and cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are criticisms of the existence of God explaining the results of RE?

A

Freud’s Idea: Believes people have a psychological need to believe in something, to clam their fears about the world

Just because people change their lives does not mean there are not alternative explanations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the criticisms for the quantity of RE supporting the existence of God?

A

Several weak arguments do put together do not make a strong argument

Lots of alternative explanations (Bertrand Russell says great works of fiction can change lives in the same way)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Swinburne believe about RE?

A

cumulative approach: looks at all the arguments together

Probability: more likely than not God exists

Testimony: should believe people’s testimony of RE

Credulity: unless proven otherwise RE should be believed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did John Hick believe about RE?

A

Pluralist

mistake is how people percieve RE. The real is transcendent and immanent; we can’t confine it to ideas of one religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What weakness of RE does Persinger propose?

A

Argues that RE are no more than the brain responding to external stimuli

By stimulating temporal lobe with God helmet, RE can be artificially induced

17
Q

How is RE
not being able to be verified a weakness?

A

cannot be verified by empirical testing, it is all an assumption

18
Q

Why is the claim that RE is incentivised a weakness?

A

Re are often accompanied by or manipulated by atmousphere e.g music

19
Q

Why is the supposed induction of RE not a weakness?

A

Are all RE induced? Scientists reduce all human experience to brain activity

Physicalism approach

Not everyone is wearing a God helmet

20
Q

Why is RE not being able to be verified not a weakness?

A

Just because we cant verify something with evidence doesn’t mean it isn’t true

21
Q

Why is RE being manipluated not a weakness?

A

Not all RE are incentivised or manipulated

22
Q

What did Ludwig Wittgenstein believe about RE?

A

Each person sees RE differently, testimonies are unreliable

23
Q

What did R. M. Hare believe about RE?

A

uses ‘blik’ to describe someone’s personal world view and interpretation of an event

Meaningful but unverifiable

24
Q

What did Peter Vardy believe about RE?

A

Your interpretations of an experience depend on your ‘presuppositions’

25
Q

What did John Hick believe about RE?

A

RE can be interpreted in non-religious ways

26
Q

What did Sigmund Freud believe about RE?

A

We feel helpless so we create a God in our minds to protect us from fears of the universe

27
Q

How is Ludwig Wittgenstein criticised?

A

Illogical to assume all religious experiences are incorrect

28
Q

How is R. M. Hare criticised?

A

To test the truth of an RE you must look at the effects on that person

29
Q

How is John Hick criticised?

A

Illogical to assume all interpretations are incorrect

30
Q

How is Peter Vardy criticised?

A

Believers are better able to test the truth of their experience as they know what to look out for

31
Q

How is Sigmund Freud criticised?

A

Just because some RE are a result of psychological need, doesn’t mean they all are

32
Q

What were the key ideas of Michael Persinger?

A

Believes temporal lobe has a significant role within RE

Claims that by stimulating the temporal lobes he can artificially induce a moment that feels like RE

33
Q

Arguments for Michael Persinger

A

Many people involved in his study

Physical (scientific) proof

Some people in study were religious

34
Q

Arguments against Michael Persinger

A

Manufactured experience

Can you reduce every experience to temporal lobe activity?

35
Q

What were the key ideas of Richard Dawkins?

A

People who have RE are suffering from psychosis

They think its true because they think their belief is true

36
Q

What does Dawkins say are symptoms of Psychosis that are similar to RE?

A

Hallucinations
Delusions

37
Q

What are some criticisms of Dawkins?

A

Dawkins is a fundamentalist

‘mental virus’ is a false analogy

ontological reductionism- all that means to be human is reduced to scientific explanation (e.g no soul)

RS RRC Philosophy (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions