1.2 The Impact of notable sceptic publications, c.1580-1750 Flashcards
(59 cards)
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
prior to The Discoverie of Witchcraft, John Samon case: what was the timeline?
- 1561, 1570, 1572: accused and acquitted
- 1587: convicted for using witchcraft for killing a cow
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
1582 hunt: who was it driven by? what were the numbers? how did it influene Scot?
- driven by JP Brian Darcy, 14 arrests and 2 executions
- Scot disapproved of the terrible effects of the hunts
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
what were his main claims? what were they often blamed for? which cases did he doubt? what did he think about women who thought they were witches? what did he think about witches who harmed animals?
he had to self-publish his book due to the controversy
- witches were often blamed for disturbances which had no evidenec
- doubted far fetched cases such as cannibalism
- women who thought they were witches could have been suffering from delusions or depression
- witches who harmed animals did so through natural means such as poison
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
what does he write significantly about? what does he blame for the cruelty of treatment towards witches?
- discounting magic tricks by fraudulent individuals
- blames the inquisition of the catholic church for the cruelty of treatment towards witches
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
What was the effect the book had? how was James VI involved?
- did more harm than good
- James VI ordered all copies to be burnt, then wrote Daemonologie 1957
- he denounced Scot as unchristian
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
Why was Scot sceptical about witchcraft? which belief was he devoted to?
- he was devoted to a ‘supernatural unknown’ - a belief that undiscovered elements of nature contained many mysteries that could explain unkown phenomena
- Eg. it was accepted healing could be done at a distance, or by stones/plants
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
What did Scot believe in terms of the Canon Episcopi? what did it acknowledge?
- he argued a belief in witchcraft was incompatible with the Canon Episcopi, a medieval text informing religous law in Europe.
- the text acknowledged witchcraft wasn’t real, and witchcraft cases were cases of deception
Scot’s The Discovierie of Witchcraft
background context for Scot’s publication?
chelmsford trials
- he lived on a family estate in Kent
- most social interaction would have been with his tenants, who would have believed in witchcraft
- when children were being used as witnesses in Chelmsford, his view of most trials helped on very dubious foundations were affirmed
Harsnett’s A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practices of John Darrell
Harsnett’s career
1599
- present at the examination of Darrell and George More
- born in essex in 1561 from a humble family, and gained a degree from Cambridge
- became a minister in 1583 then returned to study divinity at Cambridge
- Archbishop of York in 1629
- when he was involved in the case of Darrell he was a chaplain to Richard Bancroft, Bishop of London.
Impact of A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel
main argument surrounding misleading people with magic? how does he criticise the catholic church?
- Harsnett makes it clear misleading people with magic has existed since ancient times.
- he also criticses the catholic church, stating priests can claim to carry out miracles very easily
Impact of A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel
What does Harsnett argue about catholics performing tricks and miracles?
- catholics do so
- such as those carried out by holy water, making the signf of the cross to bless, along with communiom. They believe rituals like this can solve any problems
Impact of A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel
how does he criticise exorcism?
- only God can do so
- casting out Devils is a scam
Impact of A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel
how does Harsnett criticise Darrell through his interrogation of him? What does he claim about Darrell and Somers?
- he claims Darrell immediately doubted the reliability of some witnesses, which is something guilty men do
- he also said Darrell was able to convince people WIlliam Somers was possessed, and claims Darrell is actually immoral
Impact of A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel
third section of his work: what did Darrell encourage Somers to do? what does harsnett claim about Somers fits?
- Darrell encouraged Somers to revoke his confession
- harsnett claims the fits experienced by Somers were misinterpreted
Impact of A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel
fourth section: what does Harsnett discount?
languages and Somers fits
- discredits Somers fits. There was nothing supernatural about them
- Darrell lied about Somers being fluent in languages during his fits
- Somers fell into a fit in front of Harsnett and was asked questions in Greek, but laughed in response.
Impact of A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel
fifth section: the boy of burton. What did Darrell instruct Darling to do? how does he discredit Katherine Wrights confession? what about her apparitions? why did she exaggerate her symptoms?
- Darrell instructed Darling to act possessed, and he confessed
- Katherine Wrights confesseion was ultimately that she was beaten by her father-in-law for many years, making her weak and liable to hallucinations. Her apparitions were fictitious, and she exaggerated her symptoms to avoid further beatings.
the pamphlet war
how did Darrell respond to Harsnett? what was his work called?
A detection of that sinful, shaming, lying, and ridiculous discours of Samuel Harsnett 1600
the pamphlet war
John Deacon and John Walker: who were they? what was their work and argument
- ministers with puritan sympathies
- the Devil could not possess people and only God could. God would not allow new bodies to be created to do the Devils work.
- Dialogical Discourses of Spirits and Divels 1601
the pamphlet war
how did Darrell respond to Deacon and Walker?
- The Replie of John Darrell to the answere of John Deacon and John Walker 1602.
- he repeated he witnesed of all the posessions he claimed to
the pamphlet war
how was the pamphlet war significant? what did it question?
- lucrative practises of Darrell
- but also demonic posession add its ‘cures’ in general
the pamphlet war
Darrells support: who wrote to him?
- Joseph Hall (who became Bishop of Exeter and Norwich) wrote Darrell was honourable and his critics were jealous
the pamphlet war
Harsnetts own religous beliefs?
- difficult to ascertain, but he was accused as a young minister of having catholic sympathies
- 1596 supported Peter Baro, a professor at Cambridge with Arminian tendancies
- Darrell was a puritan
the pamphlet war
which of Harsnett’s works clearly signifies his criticism of Darrell?
- A Declaration of Egregious Popish impostures 1603
- sole blame for witchcraft accusations on the church
the pamphlet war
darrell and harsnett different religous beliefs?
- darrell was a puritan
- harsnett was a church of england conformist