Tutorial 2 + Lecture 2: International migration and social networks Flashcards

1
Q

What is social capital?

A
  • Social capital = sum of resources, actual or virtual, that accrue to an individual or group possessing a durable network (Bordieu) -> resources provided by social ties/connections that stimulate or undermine migration
  • Meso-level theory
  • Results?
    o Give access to support and resources
    o Lead to migration networks: relation between migrants, former migrants, and potential migrants
    o Migration industry: institutional actors: employers, universities, smugglers, NGOs, … -> in business due to migration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

To what extent and how do informal social networks facilitate international migration?

A

How?
- Networks => give info, infrastructure, support to newcomers => reduce costs (transaction costs, lower barriers, lower risk)
o Eg. funding, housing, employment, information provision in destination country
- Effects of social remittances + relative deprivation
- Massey’s theory of cumulative causation: migrations affect the context in which the process takes place => migration = more likely -> self-perpetuating feedback loop
- Mediate (amplify or weaken) contextual factors ??

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who supports migrants and what kind of support do they provide?

A

Who?
o family members w eco resources and housing, former migrants w info, human traffickers, employers looking for cheap labor, government if legal status, NGO’s: eg. family reunification

who supports less?
o high-educated, women and people w no contacts
o migrants who believe NL migration policies = strict
o short stay migrants

What kind of support?
o Psychological support from families
o Costs and paperwork support from current migrants living abroad
….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

To what extent, how and under what conditions can informal social networks also undermine international migratory movements?

A
  • gate closers -> info demotivation, take away resources (housing, employment, …), governments: policies (direct vs Indirect), racism (public opinion)
  • tightness of network => exclusivity
  • Settled migrants -> can decline support to newcomers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do people migrate? (forced vs voluntary)

A
  • forced: conflict, violence, war, persecution, environment, access to services, …
  • voluntary: family, education, retirement, job, lifestyle (Eg. young people want to experience other cultures) , better opportunities

! often mix: no strict dichotomy !

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

On what levels is migration motivated/On what levels can migration be analyzed?

A
  1. macro-level: migration = intrinsic part of broader processes of development and social transformation
    Eg. labour market dynamics, interstate relationships, …
    - theories: push and pull factors & dependency/world systems theory
  2. micro-level: migration = function of capabilities and aspirations to migrate within a given set of constraints
    - theories: neo-classical theory & NELM
  3. meso-level: between macro and micro
    - 3 theories: social network theory, cumulative causation & migration undermining effects of social networks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the migratory process?

A

= the complex sets of factors and interactions which shape migration -> affects every dimension of social existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What do functionalist theories say?

A

Society = system, collection of interdependent parts, in which an inherent tendency toward equilibrium exists -> every social process => balance!
=> migration = “optimization mechanism” => contributes to greater equality

3 theories:
1. Push-pull model
2. Neoclassical migration theory
3. Human capital theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What do historical-structural theories say?

A
  • migration = manifestation of capitalism, imperialism and unequal terms of trade => = way of mobilizing cheap labour for capital => keep wages down + boost profits of businesses and eco growth in destination countries => migration = exploitation mechanism
  • migration = strongly patterned process -> reason? Structural factors eg. social stratification, market access, power inequalities, cultural repertoire, … constrain people’s indv choices, affecting their preferences and ‘channeling’ the decisions in very particular directions

2 theories:
- dependency theory/world-systems theory
- globalization theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the push-pull model?

A
  • Ravenstein: “laws of migration”
  • push: population growth, political repression, …
  • pull: demand for labour, availability of land, …
  • critique
  • Purely descriptive models enumerating factors -> without specifying their role and interactions
  • Difficulty explaining why many countries = simultaneous immigration and why migrants return, …
  • Factors = not always deterministic/cause Eg. population pressure might stimulate innovation, increase productivity, …
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the neoclassical migration theory?

A
  • rooted in modernization theory
  • key assumption:
     Migration = investment in human capital: higher earnings in the future
     Rational choice: people migrate when (expected) benefits > costs of migration
  • factors affecting migration decisions:
     Wage differentials in sending and receiving countries
     Costs of migration and first settlement
     Available resources for potential migrants
     Migration policies: restrictive policies => more constraints => higher costs
  • pros?
     Realistic view on migration motives: most migrants: want to gain economically or at least survive -> mostly go from poor to rich country
     Attention to costs of migration -> explains why many people do not migrate
  • cons?
     People = not rational -> do not calculate -> disregard emotional reasons
     Migrants = do not have full and correct information (irrealistic ideas)
     Migrants = do not have access to markets -> eg. banks that lend money for migration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain human capital theory

A
  • migration = investment that increases the productivity of human capital knowledge and skills
  • people invest in migration = same as investment in education -> migrate if additional lifetime benefits > costs from migration
    => ‘return on investment’
    => explains why young/higher skilled = migrate more (-> more specialization => need to move further)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is some critique of functionalist theories?

A
  1. Unrealistic assumptions
    o 1st As: people = rational actors who maximize income or ‘utility’ based on a systematic comparison of lifetime costs and benefits
    o 2nd As: potential migrants = perfect knowledge of wage levels and employment opportunities in destination countries
    o 3rd As: markets = perfect and accessible to poor
  2. no room for human agency -> assume indvs = who react in predictable uniform and passive ways to external factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain the dependency theory/world-systems theory

A
  • key argument:?
     Contraction between capitalist “core” countries and less developed countries in the periphery: exploitation
     Capitalism -> destroy traditional economies => migration
     Migration = exploitation of poor countries
     Poor countries = provide cheap low-skilled labour OR high-skilled workers
  • pros:
     Different perspective on migration: migration = not a threat for global north + rich countries = benefit
  • cons:
     Deterministic explanation: migration is explained because it is in the interest of the “Capital”
     No attention for agency: migrants = seen as victims
     The assumption that capitalism penetrates agricultural regions confirms the myth of immobile peasant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the globalization theory

A

Ambiguous effects?
- globz spurred migration -> consequence of growing inequality + revolutions in transport/communication technology
- However, increased scope for trade and outsourcing -> replaced migration

Critique
- globalization = not natural or inevitable new world order BUT merely the latest phase in the evolution of the capitalist world economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is some critique of historical-structural theory?

A
  1. stress structural constraints + limited human agency -> depict migrants as victims of global capitalism => deterministic views: no justice to diversity of migration + active choices migrants
  2. assume ‘myth of immobile peasants’: assumption that pre-modern societies = isolated stable homogenous peasant communities
17
Q

Explain the dual labour market theory/segmented labour market theory?

A
  • intl migration = caused by demand within advanced economies for lower-skilled workers to carry out production tasks and to staff service enterprises
18
Q

Explain the new economics of labour migration theory

A
  1. migration = risk-sharing behavior of families or households
    -> Eg. diversify income sources in order to spread and minimize income risks => less vulnerable when for eg. floods, …
    -> households send 1 family member abroad to earn additional income -> diversify sources of income
  2. migration = family/household investment to provide for investment in eco activities
  3. relative deprivation > absolute poverty
    -> the feeling of being less well-off than other community members
  4. migrants = countries w lowest employment > highest wages -> why? Goal = minimizing risks and certainty > maximal profit
19
Q

Explain the aspiration capabilities model

A
  • human capability = the ability of human beings to lead lives they have reason to value + enhance substantive choices (or freedoms) they have
  • aspirations = function of people’s general life aspirations and perceived geographical opportunity structures

Higher development levels => increase capabilities BUT at certain level: decrease migration aspirations

20
Q

Explain the social network theory

A
  • explains how migrants create and maintain social ties w other migrants and w family/friends back home + how this can lead to emergence of social networks
  • factors?
     Normative pressure: ‘stories’ which shape people’s views and aspirations to migrate and may encourage subsequent movements
     Social learning: actual support, relevant information and advice -> reduces risks/costs
     Network externalities: generalized resources = available in migration flows, like access to smuggling networks or recruiting employers in the host society
21
Q

What are migrant networks?

A

= sets of interpersonal ties that connect migrants, former migrants, and non-migrants in origin and destination areas through bonds of kin, friendship and shared community origin
=> decrease eco, soc, and psychological costs of migration

22
Q

What is the migration industry?

A

= employers, travel agents, recruiters, brokers, smugglers, humanitarian agencies -> interest in continuation of migration

23
Q

Explain the migration systems theory

A

= looks at how migration = intrinsically linked to other forms of exchange, notably flows of goods, ideas and money
- migration system = set of places linked by flows and counter-flows of people, goods, services and information, which tend to facilitate further exchange, including migration, between places
- Eg. migration from India: linked to British colonial presence

24
Q

Explain cumulative causation

A

= idea that migration induces changes in social and eco structures that make additional migration likely

‘contextual/pos feedback mechanisms’
 = migration changes environment => more migration
 Social support => migration = cheaper
 Migration culture
 Remittances cause relative deprivation
 ‘brain drain’
 Eg. remittances -> increase income inequality in origin country => feeling of relative deprivation => migration aspirations

25
Q

What is the role of networks and informal support?

A
  • direct: contributing to transport costs, providing access to housing and employment
  • indirect: frequent home visits => spread info about benefits of migration + ‘culture of migration’
    -> ‘personal network feedback’: messages from previous migrants to prospective migrants
    -> ‘cumulative causation’: as people gain migratory experience, they become a source of ‘migratory social capital’ for other people from the same community of origin
26
Q

How can we explain declining migration

A
  • 3 institutional developments: stricter immigration policies, reduced labour market opportunities + unfriendly societal reception of immigrants
  • Migration policies
    o Until 1980s: policies = tolerant -> migrants = not perceived as a threat -> migrants did not compete w same jobs
    o 1980s: eco crisis + new regulations to protect welfare state =>need BSN for irregular migrants
  • Labour market opportunities
    o 1990s: opportunities grew but discontent about multicultural society
    o 2000s: decline job opportunities -> eco recession in 2003 + EU enlargement => labour migrants from Eastern Europe
  • Societal perception
    o Public opinion: anti-immigration and anti-multiculturalism sentiments

-> direct effect? Discouragement newcomers + indirect: settled migrants = discouraged to support/assist

27
Q

Explain the results of the study by Massey: what drives US-Mexico migration?

A

Neo-classical economics:
- differences in wages/benefits = not major factor in migration course
- social services = do not appear to influence migration process in consistent way
- human capital: influence the migration process -> migrants move to places where skills/abilities = most highly rewarded
- migration specific human capital : increases chances of taking another US trip

New Economics of migration
- strong support: Mexicans migrate to gain access to scarce capital -> migration = linked to fluctuations
- as interests increases => mexicans leave for US or back to mexico to invest
- home ownership => decreases chances initial and repeat migration

Segmented labour market theory
- modest support: as rate of us job creation increases => increase undocumented trips
- rate of employment growth = unrelated

Social capital theory
- intitial stage: social capital: ties to parents, siblings and community members
- additional trips: reduced by migration wives, children, …

World Systems theory
- not much support: direct foreign investment = small effect

conclusion: 3 fundamental forces:
(1) Social Capital Formation
o Each act of migration creates additional social capital capable of initiating and sustaining more migration: self-perpetuating
o Social capital is very widely diffused throughout the Mexican population: half of adult Mexicans are related to someone in the US

(2) Human Capital Formation
o For undocumented migrants, the most important element of human capital is migration experience itself. The more US experience, the higher the likelihood of both legal and undocumented migration: self-reinforcing.

(3) Market Consolidation
o Risk diversification and capital accumulation has households migrate internationally: economic development goes hand in hand with international migration.
o Mechanism: Growing economic insecurities coupled with a strong desire to participate in this new political economy