Lecture 3: European migration "crisis" and EU migration policies Flashcards
What makes an internally displaced migrant different from a refugee?
- internally displace person = not yet crossed an international border
- No international protection
- No aid from international organizations
What is the fundamental problem around multilateral migration governance?
- effectiveness requires transfer of national sovereignty over control immigration and settlement of non-citizens to supra-national governmental bodies and legal institutions
how have states already aimed at regulating international migration?
- bilateral negotiations
- regional agreements
- global governance
What are the 3 levels of mobility freedoms?
- Free entry (visa-free travel)
- Right of residence
- Right to establishment (right to work and do business)
Demonstrate (shortly) the timeline in EU migration regime?
1957: Treaty of Rome: creation of common market between 6 signatory states + freedom of movement if employment (set up European Community)
1986: Single European Act (SEA): (revision of Treaty of Rome): achieve common market + further pol/eco integration
1992: treaty on EU (TEU): immigration = in hands of member states
1995: Schengen Agreement: establish travel free zone
1997: Treaty of Amsterdam: issues concerning visas, asylum, immigration and other policies = first pillar EU
2007: Lisbon Treaty: complete inclusion of migration and asylum within framework of European treaties
What major conflicts shaped the refugee regime?
- Second World War
40 million European displaced persons -> went to Australia, Canada, and other countries - Cold War
Iron Curtain: non-departure regime => overall asylum levels = low - Other conflicts?
Israel vs Palestine conflict
Escalation struggles against white colonial or settler regimes in Africa in the 1960s
Resistance against US-supported military regimes in Latin America in the 1970s
Long drawn-out political and ethnic struggles in the Middle East and Asia
What restrictions were introduced to construct a fortress in Europe?
- Changes in national legislation to restrict access to refugee status -> extension of temporary protection ipv permanent refugee status
- Non-arrival policies -> prevent people without documentation from entering
- Diversion policies -> declaring bordering EU countries as safe third countries
- Restrictive interpretations
- European cooperation
What was the EU response to increased migration and how did it contribute to this sense of crisis?
1.EU = slow to respond -> in terms of providing additional assistance to support regions w refugees + movement of increasing numbers of refugees along Mediterranean
- failure of EU member states to share responsibility for dealing w increased arrivals in a pragmatic and principled way
What is a ‘containment chronotype’?
- focus on preventing or discouraging people from attempting to reach EU territory ipv providing protection and support/addressing factors causing people to move in the first place
What are some of the flawed assumptions and expectations underlying European policy?
- Assumptions about why people were on the move
-> refer to outdated push-pull model - Assumptions about the nature of the journey to Europe
-> assumption journey = linear + people leave country for Europe => in-between = neglected
=> direct eco resources to border controls ipv support for hosting refugee countries - Expectations regarding the impact of policymaking on refugee and migrant decision making
-> challenged by ad-hoc/dynamic decision-making processes - Assumptions about the nature and role of smugglers and smuggling networks
-> demand for smugglers = continue in absence of opportunities to escape violence, conflict, and unbearable poverty
-> + assumes large-scale smuggler network: often local
Is the “migration crisis” over?
- refugees and migrants = still crossing Mediterranean to Europe
- few meaningful developments in opening safe and legal routes
- EU policies = most likely increased ipv decreased demand for smugglers
- EU approach = costly + devastating effect on lives of refugees
-> EU = no long-term strategy to deal w sudden mass influx!
What are some of the elements that need to be included in a new approach to migration EU policy?
1) addressing drivers of migration
-> requires thinking through conseq of EU policies in areas of HR humanitarian action, foreign affairs, …
-> EU = need to think about drivers forced migration + role in creating/fueling conflict
2) providing access to protection and rights
-> EU = legally obliged to treat all arrivers in accordance with intl law
3) creating safe and legal entry routes
-> deterrence policies -> only increase extent human suffering -> not scale of migration
-> need for resettlement programmes, increasing humanitarian visas, establishing temporary intl protection
4) moving beyond the politics of containment
-> EU = should design/implement/monitor migration w third countries -> goal? To prevent refugees in abusive situations
Differentiate between migration journeys, migration trajectories and migration routes?
- migration journeys = specific cross-border travels of migrants
- migration trajectories = multiple journeys in various directions over a longer period of time
- migration routes = certain pathways migrants customarily follow -> collective outcome of indv migration decisions and behavior
What are some of the dichotomies existing in migration academia?
1) dichotomy between sending and receiving country
-> disregard ‘time-in-between’ = transit countries => only Europe = relevant destination
2) dichotomy between temporary and permanent
-> why misleading?
1. many migrants = Lybia/Iran/Turkey as their final destination but compelled to move due to changing conditions/realities
2. migrants = aim to travel further but cannot due to lack of resources => ‘stepwise’ migration
3) dichotomy between forced and voluntary
-> why misleading
1. the gap between state definitions
2. often exist in a continuum
3. motives for migration = may change over time
Explain the dichotomy between sending and receiving country?
-> disregard ‘time-in-between’ = transit countries => only Europe = relevant destination
-> misconception refuted: migrants : stay in transit countries + envision future in neigbouring country but due to changing conditions -> go to Europe