1- the logic of comparison Flashcards

1
Q

what does comparative politics help us to understand?

A
  • why political outcomes happen in different countries and then helps to make policies to change outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what factors make answers valuable?

A
  • falsifiability, can it be proved wrong?
  • internal validity, is there cause and effect in your research
  • external validity: are your findings relevant to other existing research or cases?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a theory?

A

a logically consistent statement that tells us why things we observe occur
trys to explain the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the three types of theory?

A
  • grand narrative
  • middle range
  • existing literature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are grand narrative theories?

A

ones that try to explain everything such as marxism or feminism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are middle range theories?

A

transferable concepts
for example how the bourgeois are important to democratisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are existing literature theories

A

particlar pheonomena
such as the domestic division of labour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is path dependency?

A

past conditions shape future conditions institutions can be committed to develop in certain ways as a result of their strucual properties or values
history shapes the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is a dependent variable?

A

the thing you are trying to explain
ex. democratic collapse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is an independent variable

A

that causes of what you are trying to explain
ex. authoritarian leaders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are intervening variables

A

intermediate steps in a casual chain
explaining why or how the relationship exists

ex level of income helps to explain the relationship between level of education (independent variable) and spending (dependent variable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is deductive reasoning

A
  • when a theory is observed
  • a hypothesis is created and then researched
  • to either be confirmed or denied

from the general to the specific
theory to obersvation and confirmation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is inductive reasoning?

A
  • observing something happening
  • indetifies a patterns an regulartieis
  • then test a hypotheiss to create a theory

obersvation to theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

mills method of agreement

A

look for all factors that are present on all occasions that E occurs

for example when studying democratic backsliding you will look for all occasions whereit has happened and look at all the similar factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

mills method of difference

A
  • tells us to look for some factors present when E occurs and absent when another similar occasion happens when E doesn’t occur
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what research is mill’s method of difference used in?

A

‘small N’ investigations

17
Q

flaws with mill’s methods

A
  • makes large assumptions leading to curiosity rather than research outcomes and the examination of only one cause rather than more than 2 factors working together
    leads to deterministic rather than probabilistic research method
18
Q

what is a casual mechanism

A

an explanation of how a cause produces and effect

19
Q

what is process tracing?

A
  • involves following the steps of the causal mechanism
  • links the dependent and independnet variabels together throug the process of interveinign vraibles
    links how things flow from x to y
20
Q

what are the steps of logic of process tracing?

A
  • a researcher comes up with a clear and explicit casual chain
  • this is derived from some general theory or common sense
  • then they confirm each stage of the link do exist by utilising specific obersevations drawn from the case
21
Q

what are divergences?

A
  • when two events occur with a similar factor but different outcomes
22
Q

convergences?

A

when two or more events occur without a similar factors but have similar outcomes

23
Q

what is a controlled comparison?

A

examining the relationship between an independnet variable and a dependnet variable

24
Q

advantages of controlled comparisons

A
  • when done correct can generate external and internal validity
  • can illuminate the world’s great divergences and convergences across nation sates
  • divergences sucha s why india left british colonialism a democracy but bermuda didnt
  • convergences such as the french revolution v the intervwar russian revoltion when they had similar outocomes but different motivations
25
Q

disadvantages of controlled comparisons

A
  • crticised by quanitiative scholars for having restictive epstimological assumptions made that dont justify the uthors ambitions
  • multi-method becoming more popular way to research
26
Q

what issues are there of trade offs in comparative research

A
  • lots of research has to decide in either having a large statement after research which has wide applicbility across a broad population an dhavng a deeper narrower arguent that idenify a causual pathway in a smalll number of cases
  • multimethod has calmed this down
27
Q

what are the four levels of analysis to explain politics

A
  • individual agency shaping politics
  • group agency shaping politics
  • states
  • international organisations
28
Q

what is the supply and demand argument of politics

A

do social structures shape institutions (agency) v do institutions shape social structures (strucutral)

29
Q

what are counterfactuals?

A

give a different perspective of what hasn’t happened but could have

for example
if germany had one the second world war what the world would have looked like

30
Q

disadvantages of comparison

A
  • monocaulsaity: some things canot be compared with others
  • endogeinity: when a variable observed that isnt included in our model is related to a varibale we have incorperated into out model
  • hard to establish internal validity as some exmaples wont show cause and effect
  • external validity: soem exampples are bad to be used in an external setting
  • selection bais: amny researches choose exmapels that fit into their hypotheiss n dprove it right
31
Q

what do theories aim to do?

A
  • produce a set of causual relationships between the DV and IV
  • makes predicitions
  • create a testable hypothesis
  • is falsifiable
32
Q

what is epsteimology

A

the theory of knlowedge and generating knoweldge
in politics it is how to gain knowedlge to make society just

33
Q

what is ontology?

A

a way to explain the world by. putting things into categoriy. explains things as they are rather than trying to change things