Social Intelligence & Communication Flashcards

1
Q

SOCIAL LEARNING MECHANISMS

A

OBSERVATIONAL CONDITIONING
STIMULUS/LOCAL ENHANCEMENT
IMITATION
TOOL USE
TEACHING
COMMUNICATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

OBSERVATIONAL/VICARIOUS CONDITIONING

A
  • monkeys fearing snakes
  • naiive monkey doesn’t fear snake
  • observes fear reaction in other w/snake present
  • conditioned fear of snakes
  • particularly important in phobias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ENHANCEMENT

A
  • blue tits & milk
  • demonstrators beh draws observers attention to location/stimulus
  • makes imitation hard to establish
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

IMITATION

A
  • when enhancement/observational conditioning can’t explain new beh
  • quail/rats/budgerigars/pigeons
  • 2-action test
  • set up 2 dif responses both delivering same reward (ie. pressing lever)
  • demonstrator performs 1 response to stimuli; observer watches; then test observer
  • same response could be =
    1. imitation evidence
    2. priming of response; may not require effort; concept of mirror neurons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IMITATION: RATS

A

HEYES ET AL. (1990)
- response = pushing joystick to left/right (not typical beh); bi-directional response controls for enhancement effects
- rats observed demonstrator pushing joystick; transferred to demonstrator chamber; reinforced for pushing either direction (preferred to push in same direction)
- BUT turned out observer only followed smell of demonstrator on joystick aka. enhancement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

IMITATION: PRIMATES

A
  • potato washing in Japanese macaques
  • spread in pop too slow to be imitation (stimulus enhancement)
  • anecdotal evidence (problem of anthropomorphising)
  • conclusion = inconclusive evidence for true imitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TEACHING

A
  • intentional learning facilitation w/teacher costs
  • flavour prefs in rats/mobbing in birds = NOT teaching
  • little intentional teaching evidence in animals; only beh helping young educate themselves/direct attention to object/location/beh (ie. meerkat guard giving young de-tailed scorpion to learn hunting)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

COMMUNCATION TYPES

A

REFERENTIAL
TACTICAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

COMMUNICATION: PIGEONS

A
  • receiver/sender set up; sender sends 2 lights; cannot be directly viewed by receiver BUT can see sender; 2 response keys (L/R); sender cannot see them either
  • both rewarded if correct response key clicked (green = L, red = R)
  • receiver settles on 1 key (ie. L) eventually; correct 50%; BUT sender has contingency issue aka. red doesn’t feed it -> Pavlovian conditioning (green = food) -> sender only comes out for food (discriminative stimulus for receiver) aka. peck R when seen, L when not
  • not exactly communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

COMMUNICATION VS EXPLOITATION

A
  • advantage for sender = manipulation of beh for others
  • benefits for both?
  • communication = intention to send message to receiver
  • reliable effect on receiver’s beh
  • can be between species
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

REFERNTIAL COMMUNICATION

A
  • releaser/FAP communication = no decision; direct instruction to receiver
  • referential communication = messages give varied info about external matters to sender/receiver (ie. dance language of honey bees/vervet monkey alarm calls)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly