Contracts Flashcards
How does the UCC “battle of the forms” rule work in a contract with CONFLICTING terms between merchants?
Acceptance is still effective even if it contains conflicting terms different from terms of the offer
Conflicting terms are cancelled out by the knock-out rule and the UCC’s gap-filling provisions will be used
Under the UCC, what 2 ways can a seller accept an offer (eg purchase order) from a buyer?
(1) by shipping the goods; acceptance is effective immediately and creates contract w/ terms of offer
(2) by promising to ship the ordered goods; acceptance is effective when the oral promise is made or when written promise is sent
How does the UCC “battle of the forms” rule work in a contract with NEW terms between merchants?
Acceptance of offer is effective even if acceptance contains new terms
When parties are both merchants, new terms will become part of contract unless:
(1) offer requires offeror’s assent to new terms
(2) offeror objects w/in reasonable time
OR
(3) new terms materially alter contract
What 3 types of evidence does the UCC parol evidence rule permit to be used to explain or supplement terms of a final written agreement?
(1) course of performance (highest preference): sequence of conduct relevant to understanding agreement if (a) agreement involves repeated occasions for performance by a party and (b) other party accepts performance w/o objection
(2) course of dealing: sequence of conduct concerning previous transactions b/w parties to establish common basis of understanding
(3) trade usage (lowest preference): practices or methods in the parties’ industry/business practiced w/ enough regularity to justify expectation of practice
Under the UCC, the impracticability doctrine will excuse a seller’s non-performance if what 3 elements are met?
(1) unanticipated/extraordinary event made it impossible or impracticable for seller to perform as agreed
(3) nonoccurrence of event was basic assumption of K
AND
(3) seller did not assume the risk of the event’s occurrence
How can an implied-in-fact contract be created?
Created by party’s conduct or failure to act if the party:
(1) intentionally engages or fails to engage in conduct
AND
(2) knows or has reason to know that asset can be inferred from their conduct
When an owner breaches a construction contract during construction, what may the builder recover?
Lost profits + costs incurred
MINUS loss avoided (such as by resale or using materials for another job)
Under the UCC, when may a buyer reject a shipment under an installment contract?
(1) shipment substantially impairs value of installment
(2) cannot be cured
Under the UCC, when must a buyer accept a shipment under an installment contract?
(1) conforming shipment
(2) nonconforming shipment IF seller promises to cure
Under the UCC, when can a buyer cancel future installments under an installment contract?
Can cancel future installments if one or more nonconforming shipment substantially impairs value of the whole contract
Under the UCC, when can a buyer NOT cancel future installments under an installment contract?
(1) accepts nonconforming shipment without notice of cancellation
(2) brings action only for past installments
(3) demands performance of future installments
What are 5 ways an offer may be terminated?
(1) revocation & constructive revocation (offeree learns information inconsistent w/ offer)
(2) rejection
(3) counteroffer
(4) offeror dies or becomes incapacitated
(5) reasonable amount of time has passed with no acceptance
When a promise lacks consideration, what does the promissory estoppel doctrine state?
Promise may still be enforced if:
(1) promisor should reasonably expect promise to induce action or forbearance from promisee
(2) promise does induce to the promisee’s detriment
(3) injustice can be avoided only by enforcing the promise
What are the 3 elements of a quasi-contract/implied-in-law contract?
When a contract lacks consideration, it may be considered a quasi-contract and may be enforced if:
(1) P confers a measurable benefit on D
(2) P reasonably expected to get paid
(3) would be unfair to let D keep benefit without paying
How can SOF be satisfied by writing?
When it is determined that K falls within SOF, must determine if it has been satisfied. Writing will satisfy SOF if the writing:
(1) signed by the party against whom
enforcement is sought
(2) shows contract was formed
(3) includes the requisite terms
(a) UCC = parties, subject, quantity
(b) CL = parties, subject, quantity and price