Eating behaviour in childhood week/lecture 4/5 Flashcards

1
Q

what is weaning?

A

Weaning/complementary feeding:
- Major developmental change
○ Milk to solids
○ Sucking to chewing and biting
○ Dependent to independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

when are infants weaned?

A
  • Milk energy supply cannot satisfy infant or provide nutrients
    • Motor skills are developed sufficiently
    • Major variability
      ○ Thailand: 15% some solids at 2 weeks
      ○ UK: 3% some solids at 6 weeks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

weaning guidelines

A
  • WHO (2001) recommends weaning at 6 months (because by this point babies can sit and hold themselves and their heads up and reaching behaviours have begun)
    • UK department of health adopted this in 2003
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

reality of weaning in the UK

A

○ 30% introduced solids by 4 months
○ 75% introduced solids by 5 months
○ 94% introduced solids by 6 months
§ 2010 infant feeding survey, DoH, 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

many start weaning earlier due to

A

○ Belief that baby is hungry
○ To encourage better sleep patterns
○ Following routine used with older offspring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

oral motor skills and weaning

A
  • Necessary for weaning
    • Highly complex: swallowing = 31 muscle pairs (take time to develop/mature enough)
    • Delayed transition to solids - miss this developmental period –> problems
    • Anxieties about choking can delay transition
    • Aspiration can result (if solid feeding is too late): Accidental ingestion of food or fluids into the lungs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

gag reflex

A
  • Adaptive; prevents choking
    • Common in the transition period
    • Not serious; but caregivers can panic
      ○ Gagging; retch and make a lot of noise
      ○ Choking; will be silent
    • Can become hypersensitive:
      ○ Learned from negative experience; e.g. choking
      ○ Generalises to all foods, even sight of food
      ○ Professional help required to ‘unlearn’ response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

food choice: distinguish between non-edible substances by

A

○ Sensory qualities of food
○ Anticipated consequences of eating food
§ E.g. poisoning
○ Cultural beliefs
§ Disgust
§ Disease
- Pica (eating non-foods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

pica

A

eating non-foods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

neophobia

A

fear of the new
- New and previously liked foods
- Decreases with age
○ 69% 2yo refuse to taste new foods
○ 29% 3yo
○ <1% 5yo
- 10-20 tastes needed before may ‘like’ food
- Exposure during weaning sets foundation
- BF and exposure (BF supports exposure and familiarity with flavour profiles)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

critical period in weaning

A
  • Fewer exposures needed over weaning period
    ○ Birch et al., (1998): 1 exposure = 50% increase in intake in 4-7 month olds
    • More exposures needed after weaning
    • But not critical period because…
      ○ Older child/adult will accept novel food eventually
      ○ Continued cognitive development influences further acceptance
      ○ Information in healthiness, for example, an influence intake
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

food preferences in childhood

A
  • Children prefer
    ○ Sweeter tastes
    ○ Familiar foods
    ○ Greater post-indigestive feedback
    • Children dislike
      ○ Bitter tastes
      ○ Tastes associated with illness or treatment (e.g. cancer)
      ○ Less post-indigestive feedback
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how much to eat?

A
  • Infants and young children very good at self-regulation
    • Early models based on homeostatic principles
    • Motivated to maintain absence of hunger
    • Eat until homeostasis is restored
    • Birch and Dysher (1986)
      ○ 2-5yo children
      ○ High or low energy preload snack; 40kcal vs 150kcal
      ○ Lunchtime energy intake measured
    • Compensation very accurate
    • More accurate than adults
    • Birch et al., (2003)
      ○ Eating in the absence if hunger (EAH) increases from 5-9 years
    • Rolls et al., (2000)
      ○ Macaroni cheese offered in different portion sizes
      ○ 2-3 year olds eat approximately same
      ○ 4-6 yo eat +60% if portion size doubled
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

types of weaning

A

traditional and baby-led

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

traditional weaning

A

○ Caregiver spoon feeding
○ Pureed –> small lumps –> larger lumps –> solids
○ Semi-prescribed order of introduction
○ May include baby jars
○ Caregivers select meals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

baby-led weaning

A

○ Self-feeding solid finger foods
○ No purees or infant specific foods
○ Same foods as family
○ More able to influence own food choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

weaning method and child weight gain

A
  • Townsend and Pitchford (2012)
    ○ Compared 52 spoon-fed (SF) and 54 baby-led-weaned (BLW) infants
    ○ Found:
    § Higher incidence of overweight/obesity in SF group
    § Higher incidence of underweight in BLW group
    § Significantly increased liking for carbs in BLW group
    § Carbs most preferred food of BLW group, sweet foods most preferred food of SF group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

why is there a correlation between weaning method and child weight gain?

A
  • Type of food given:
    ○ SF given sweet foods more often e.g., pork and apple
    ○ SF learned preference for sweet foods likely influences
    preferences and unhealthy food choices in future
    ○ BLW: Post-ingestive feedback – when choose own foods, learn that carbs are more satiating = preference
    • Caregiver feeding practices
      ○ SF infants more likely to be pressured to eat; dictated by external cues (e.g., food left in the jar)
      ○ General differences in familial attitudes towards food
      ○ NB: findings cross-sectional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

problems with BLW

A
  • Only effective if caregivers haver varied diet
    ○ Evidence some parents/caregivers don’t have appropriate diets; high in salt, sugar, saturated fat, yet low in energy density and folate (Rowan & Harris, 2012)
    • Rarely ready to self-feed before 6 months
      ○ If guidelines change to recommend earlier weaning, then BLW not as appropriate
    • Some evidence BLW infants consume less food and more milk
      ○ Could lead to nutritional deficiencies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

problems with SF weaning

A
  • Prolonged duration of smooth foods – delays development of oral skills (Mason et al., 2005)
    • Less exposure to different textures = more food refusal later on (Northstone et al., 2001)
      ○ Best predictor of eating chopped carrots in 12- month-old is experiences with carrots in variety of forms / textures (Blossfeld et al., 2007)
    • Effect of exposure to textures does not transfer from processed baby food to homemade meals (Birch et al., 1998)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

how common is inappropriate feeding?

A

relatively common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is inapprpriate feeding driven by?

A
  • Driven by inappropriate beliefs
    ○ Benefits to sleep
    ○ Belief hunger is main cause of distress
    • Some generational influences
      ○ Parents/grandparents
    • Confusion over guidelines
23
Q

risk factors for inappropriate feeding

A
  • Wasser et al., (2011)
    ○ More common in certain populations
    § Mothers with depression, obesity
    § Low SES family
    § Non-breast-fed infants
    ○ Links to child temperament
    § Positive association between inappropriate feeding and both ‘activity level’ and ‘distress to limitations’
    § But, may be mediated by parent self-efficacy (Anzman-Frasca et al., 2013)
24
Q

how does inappropriate feeding link to obesity?

A
  • Thompson and bentley (2013) - US study
    ○ 217 low SES, first-time mums in US Infant Care and Risk of Obesity Study
    ○ 78% of infants received age-inappropriate solids and liquids at 3 months old
    ○ 10% given fruit juice from 2 months of age
    ○ 25% drinking soft drinks by 18 months; 10 x higher than breast milk consumption!
    ○ Associated with higher mean daily intake of over 100 kcal and higher weight-for-length ratio
    • Ong et al. (2006) - UK study
      ○ Each 100-kcal excess per day at 4 months =
      § 46% increased odds of overweight at 3 years
      § 25% increased odds of overweight at 5 years
      ○ Why?
      § Clear excess in energy and protein
      § Changes in hypothalamus
      □ Rat studies (Bouret, 2012)
      § Learned preferences
25
Q

what anxieties are there around weaning?

A
  • Infant Feeding Survey (2010) found 11% UK mothers of 1-year-olds reported experiencing difficulties with weaning
    ○ Portion size and eating enough
    ○ Dealing with food rejection
    ○ Offering enough variety
    ○ Seeking helpful advice
    • Clear gap in provision of weaning information and support to parents/caregivers
26
Q

where can people get help around weaning?

A

Child feeding guide - website, app, online training:
- Commercialisation of research knowledge
- Free for parents/caregivers
- Training courses for childcare staff and health professionals

27
Q

what are the 2 places where there are common feeding problems?

A

childrens behaviour
caregivers behaviour

28
Q

common feeding problems in childrens behaviour

A
  • Food refusal
    • Rejection of bitter tastes
    • Unhealthy food preferences
    • Many common difficulties reflect natural developmental stages or learned behaviour
29
Q

common feeding problems in caregivers behaviour

A
  • Pressure to eat
    • Food as a reward
    • Food to soothe
    • Restriction
    • Caregivers often rely on unfavourable practices that can undermine healthy eating behaviours
30
Q

what is food refusal characterised by?

A
  1. Refusing new of previously liked foods
    2. Rejection of bitter tastes - especially vegetables
    3. Can generalise to same texture, colours, etc
31
Q

why does food refusal occur?

A

○ Neophobia/developing cognition/developmentally predictable

32
Q

common caregiver responses to food refusal

A

○ Pressure to eat
○ Food as a reward

33
Q

what does pressure to eat predict?

A
  • Predicts ‘picky’ eating in adults (Batsell et al., 2002)
    ○ “Bad memories of school dinners still affect the eating habits of many adults, a survey suggests” (BBC poll of 2,000 Good Food Magazine readers)
34
Q

how does pressure to eat come about?

A

coercion and bribing

35
Q

concerns of pressure to eat

A
  • Often out of concern
    ○ Linked to lower child weight (Ruzicka et al., 2021)
    ○ Unrealistic portion sizes?
    Ruzicka et al. (2021).
36
Q

study as evidence for pressure to eat reduces intake

A
  • Galloway et al. (2006)
    ○ N = 27 preschoolers (3-5 yrs)
    ○ 2 conditions
    § Pressured to eat soup (“finish your soup please”)
    § Control
    ○ Parental questionnaire about whether they used pressure to eat
    ○ Pressure condition
    § Did not eat more soup
    § More negative comments about soup
37
Q

evidence that pressure to eat increases intake

A
  • Orell-Valente et al., (2007)
    ○ 142 families of kindergartners (52% females)
    ○ Observed at dinnertime using a focused-narrative observational system
    ○ 85% parents tried to get children to eat more
    ○ 83% of children ate more than they might otherwise
    ○ 38% ate moderately to substantially more
38
Q

why might pressure to eat lead to decreased intake?

A

○ Fear response
○ Less liking, negative associations

39
Q

why might pressure to eat lead to increased intake?

A

○ Fear response
○ Over-ride internal fullness

40
Q

study for food as a reward

A
  • “you’re not having ice cream until you’ve eaten your peas”
    ○ e.g., Birch et al. (1984). Eating as the ‘means’ activity in a contingency: effects on young children’s food preferences. Child Development, 55, 432–439.
41
Q

why might foods become less liked when a reward is offered?

A

negative associations

42
Q

why might foods become more liked when a reward is offered?

A

prize
desired

43
Q

studies as food to soothe

A
  • Stifter et al., (2011)
    ○ 43 male infants/toddlers (3-34 months)
    ○ Questionnaires on use of food to soothe, parent feeding practices, parenting self-efficacy, child temperament
    ○ Weight and length taken
    • Blissett, Haycraft and Farrow (2010)
      ○ 25 children aged 3-5-years
      ○ Ate lunch to satiety
      ○ Allocated to control or negative mood condition
      ○ Children whose mothers used food to regulate emotions ate more cookies in the absence of hunger regardless of condition
      ○ Children whose mothers used food to regulate emotions ate more chocolate in the negative mood condition than in the control condition
      ○ Shows they have already learnt to deal with emotions using food
44
Q

use of food to soothe is associated with

A

○ Higher child BMI
○ More negative child temperament
○ Lower parenting self-efficacy

45
Q

what does the use of non-reward foods lead to?

A

increased liking

46
Q

can incentives work?

A
  • Incentives can be effective at
    ○ Altering children’s food choices (Orrell-Valente et al., 2007)
    ○ Increasing children’s consumption of foods (Baer et al., 1987)
    • Significant, sustained increases in liking in children praised for repeated tasting of a vegetable over 12 days (Cooke et al., 2011)
47
Q

Holley, Haycraft and Farrow (2015)

A
  • 115 parent/child pairs recruited from toddler groups
    • 2.5- to 4-year-olds
    • Each child assigned a target disliked vegetable based on parent rankings verified with a taste test
    • Experimental group parents: offered child target vegetable outside of a mealtime for 14 consecutive days
    • Control group: no offerings, just baseline and follow-up 5 minute free-eating test
    • Holley, Haycraft & Farrow (2015). ‘Why don’t you try it again?’ A comparison of parent led, home based interventions aimed at increasing children’s consumption of a disliked vegetable. Appetite, 87, 215-222.

results:
- Children’s consumption of a disliked / refused vegetable can be increased via a 14-day programme of offering and tasting with incentives and praise, plus parental modelling
- Although parental modelling may impact acceptance when combined with incentives, it does not seem to be sufficient as a solo method to achieve tastings
- Just seeing a parent eating it and saying it was nice wasn’t effective enough, they needed an incentive

48
Q

what is restriction characterised by?

A
  1. Restricting access to desired foods/drinks
    1. Often high-calorie “treat” foods
49
Q

why does restriction occur?

A

○ Response to child weight / health concerns
Driven by child innate preferences

50
Q

common caregiver responses to restriction - types of restriction

A

○ Overt restriction (restriction that the child is aware of “can I have another one?” “No you can’t”
○ Inconsistent restriction (one day they get sweets after pudding, another day they don’t - gets confusing

51
Q

studies for over restriction

A
  • Fisher and Birch (1999) 3-5y/o
    ○ Two snacks in daycare
    § Snack 1 available for full duration of snack time
    § Snack 2 only available for a limited duration
    ○ Snack 2
    § “I want it!”
    § Clapping when available
    § Pounding fists on table when access no longer available
    § Consumed more when available
  • Birch et al. (2003). Learning to overeat: maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls’ eating in the absence of hunger. Am J Clinical Nutrition, 78(2), 215-20.
    ○ 197girls: tested at 5, 7 and 9 years
    ○ Girls eat lunch until full
    ○ Free access food/toy
    ○ Found restriction at 5 led to eating in the absence of hunger at 7 and 9
    § Especially if overweight
52
Q

why does restriction lead to increased intake?

A

prize
desired
want something cant have

53
Q

how does a caregiver restrict in a good way?

A

covertly

54
Q

factors motivating caregiver control

A
  • Concern about child weight
    • Demographic factors
    • Sex of child/parent