Contract - terms implied by statute

Question 1

case that states D can end contract if item isn’t of satisfactory quality

Answer 1

Rogers v Parish

Question 2

case that states C entitled to compensation if goods not fit for purpose

Answer 2

Grant v Australian knitting mills

Question 3

case that sets out:
1. D not liable if goods fit for usual purpose
2. purchaser needs to make trader aware of specialist need before contract made

Answer 3

Griffiths v peter conway

Question 4

case that states D not liable if service performed with reasonable care and skill

Answer 4

Thake v maurice

Question 5

Section numbers for implied terms for sale of goods

Answer 5

S.9 - satisfactory quality
S.10 - fitness for purpose
S.11 - Match the description

Question 6

section numbers for remedies for goods

Answer 6

S.20 - short term right to reject
S.23 - right to repair or replacement
S.24 - final right to reject or price reduction

Question 7

section numbers for rights with services

Answer 7

S.49 - reasonable care and skill
S.52 - reasonable time frame

Question 8

section numbers for remedies for services

Answer 8

S.55 - right to repeat performance
S.56 - right to price reduction