Remedies I Flashcards
Damages
Must be:
- Foreseeable - proximate cause (foreseeable at the time of the injury)
- Unavoidable - P must take reasonable steps to mitigate
- Causal - but for test. Wrongful conduct caused the injury
- Certain - damages can’t be speculative. If past loss, look at historical records. If future loss, P must show future damages are more likely than not to happen.
Types of Tort Remedies
- Damages
2. Restitution
Purpose of Damages
- Compensate for Loss (compensatory)
2. Deter behavior (non-compensatory)
Special Damages (Economic Losses)
P can recover all economic losses proximately caused (past/future medical expenses, loss of earnings)
Calculation must be with sufficient certainty
General Damages (Non-Economic Losses)
Ex. - pain and suffering, distress, etc.
P can recover past + future non-economic losses (P + S, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, permanent disfigurement)
DO NOT need to be certain; jury can award any amount it wishes subject to proper restrictions
Nominal Damages
Awarded where P has no actual injury: establishes or vindicates P’s rights
Ex. D walks across P’s land to get to road. P has no quantifiable compensatory damages (no injury); P can get nominal damages (also discuss injunctive relief)
No nominal damages: Some claims required actual injury (ex. fraud), so no nominal damages for those cases
Punitive Damages
Awarded to punish D for willful, wanton, or malicious conduct; generally limited to intentional torts or reckless misconduct – “bad guy” conduct (more than negligence)
Look at:
degree of reprehensibility
ratio - recent law favors single-digit ratio, typically 2 to 3 times the compensatory award
**Mention - Constitutional limitation on punitive damages in that they cannot be excessive to the extent that they operate like criminal penalties without the protections of the criminal law.
Interest and Attorney’s Fees
Can obtain:
Per Statute
Per Private Attorney General Doctrine
Per Class Action
Types of Restitution
Legal Restitution (also known as Assumpsit or Quasi-Contract) Equitable Restitution
Theory of Restitution
Alternative to compensatory damages based on the theory that D should not be unjustly enriched; restore D’s unjust gain to P. Even if both compensatory damages and restitution can be found, Plaintiff must choose only one. Select the one that recovers the most for the Plaintiff.
Legal Restitution - Common Counts
- Money Had and Received - you had my money, now give it back
- Quantum Meruit - Services
- Quantum Valebant - Goods
Restitutionary Causes of Action
- Ejectment - land (specific plot of land; unlawful detainer)
- Replevin - chattel (to get back a specific painting, etc.)
- Quantum Meruit or Quasi Contract - Contract implied in law for services
Defenses to Legal Restitution
Statute of Limitations
Volunteer/Donor
Preclusion Doctrine
provides that legal claims should be tried first, before a jury, before equitable claims. Issues fully litigated in the legal portion of the trial will be prevented from being relitigated in the equitable portion of the trial.
TRO
- must bring a motion to the court requesting a TRO
- Request must comply with FRCP 65 if in federal court
- must attempt to serve other party with notice of TRO by personal service
a. May be brought Ex-Parte with a declaration of the attempts to serve D with notice of TRO by personal service. - P must show by sworn affidavit or verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result if TRO not imposed.
- A noticed hearing giving D opportunity to appear and oppose is req’d. If unable to serve, a hearing must be expedited and heard before all other matters.
- TRO expires in 14 days if not renewed or made perm. P has to request renewal of TRO or conversion of it to a Prelim. Injunction after 14 days.
- D enjoined by a TRO w/out notice can make a motion to dissolve on 2 days’ notice.
- Rule 65 requires P post a bond for the protection of D in the event they are wrongfully enjoined.