concepts and categorisation Flashcards

1
Q

William James: The principles of psychology: without categories and their corresponding concepts

A
  • infants don’t separate their sensory experience into parts,
  • but instead, experience ‘one great blooming buzzing confusion’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

recognising things allows us to..

A

act consistently and achieve our aims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

concepts give

A

us a handle on what types of thing have in common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

language gives

A

us labels for concepts - sometimes single words, sometimes longer experessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

classical view: what is a concept?

A
  • tells us what makes something a member of a category

feature theories: a set of conditions as lists of features:
e.g. bird:
- living
- feathers

network theories: we store concepts in networks with IS and HAS links

e.g. bird is animal; bird has feathers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

feature theories

A

a set of conditions as lists of features:
e.g. bird:
- living
- feathers

Smith and colleagues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

network theories

A

we store concepts in networks with IS and HAS links

e.g. bird is an animal; a bird has feathers

Collins and colleagues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Eleanor Rossch and Typicality

A
  • features or network links are not all that matters
  • typical members are processed more easily than atypical members e.g. pigeon vs ostrich
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

prototype theory

A
  • concepts are represented by prototypes ‘’
  • category membership depends on which prototype a particular thing is closest to

> depends on a measure of closeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

problems with prototype theory

A

conceptual combination:

  • we don’t just use individual concepts, we combine them
  • conceptual combination is a complex process: TIN + CAN = ‘tin can’ and TIN + MINE = ‘tin mine’

if the meaning of a concept is a prototype, it’s not clear how we define a combination of concepts

AD HOC concepts:

concepts and their corresponding categories that are put together on the fly, and therefore are not stored in memory

e.g. things to save in a fire - not stored in memory but do show prototype effects

Mathematical concepts:

  • e.g. odd numbers - they show prototypicality effects 7 = more prototypical than 395839, but they have clear analytical definitions - (not divisible by 2) not defined by prototypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

AD HOC concepts

A

concepts and their corresponding categories that are put together on the fly, and therefore are not stored in memory

e.g. things to save in a fire - not stored in memory but do show prototype effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

mathematical concepts

A

Mathematical concepts:

  • e.g. odd numbers - they show prototypicality effects 7 = more prototypical than 395839, but they have clear analytical definitions - (not divisible by 2) not defined by prototypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

‘theory’ theory

A
  • everyday concepts are defined by their place in (lay) theories about the world and how it ‘works’
  • deals with conceptual combination
    e.g. lay theories tell us that can be made of tin but mines cannot
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

basic level categories

A
  • concepts have hierarchy
  • one of the levels is easiest to deal with - basic level categories

apple compared to bananas (Easy)

fruit - could compare types of apples to each other (harder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

types of concept

A

Concrete nouns:
Natural (people, animals, plants, natural objects)
Artefacts (man-made objects: table, building, etc)

Abstract:
scientific(gravity, evolution)
social/societal(family, law, gov)

Verbs: (events - hit, states - admire, processes - decay)
Adjectives(properties of nouns - red)
Adverbs:(properties of verbs, suddenly

Concepts that link ideas (and, because, before)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lakoff and Johnson’s
‘metaphors we live by’

A
  • we understand abstract concepts by networks of metaphorical links to concrete concepts
  • e.g. an abstract state of being is a ‘container’
  • how we talk about being contained is parallel to how we talk about the abstract state of ‘container’ - we use metaphors to understand states
  • not just figures of speech - conceptual frameworks
17
Q

embodiment

A
  • traditional treatment of concepts is through formal analysis
  • to understand concepts you must know how people interact with the world
  • e.g. to know what is meant by ‘chair’ you do not only need to know that it is something to sit on but also understand how and why people sit down - (via experience)
  • encoding of concepts is similar to our motor knowledge of how to interact with objects (e.g. chairs)
18
Q

embodiment and the motor cortex: ‘an arm and a leg’ - supporting embodiment

A
  • look at brain activity
  • applied TMS to motor brain regions
  • faster reactions to leg-related words with leg stimulation and faster reactions to arm-related words with arm stimulation

language is an integrated part of experience

19
Q

The action compatibility effect (ACE)

A

Glenberg and colleagues

if you ask

‘you closed the drawer is an OK sentence = ps push lever to say OK

'’you opened the draw is an OK sentence’ = ps pull lever to say OK

action to respond is compatible with the action described

responses were also quicker than with opposite pairings (close/towards)

20
Q

embodied cognition: Up and Down

A

Percher et al

respond: yes or no to ‘is it found in the sky’ or ‘is it found in the ocean’

  • responses slower when location of the word does not match the expected position

e.g. sky words - top, whale - bottom but if opposite = slower

21
Q

embodied cognition and shape image

A

Zwaan et al

  • text representations should include perceptual properties, even if those properties are not mentioned
  • sentence - followed by picture - ps had to name picture
  • bird sat quietly = quicker if an image is of a bird sitting quietly rather than flying
22
Q

embodied cognition - orientation

A
  • put a pencil in pot - expect vertical
  • put pencil in drawer - expect horizontal

some studies claimed the opposite effect but replication of this found original effect again

23
Q
A