Serious Crime and Other Offences - Homicide Flashcards

1
Q

What does homicide cover?

A

Offences of murder, manslaughter and other occasions where a person causes, or is involved in, the death of another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the offence of murder?

A

When a person unlawfully kills another person and they have the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm

Penalty:

-Over 18 = life imprisonment
-18-21 = custody for life
- Under 18 = detention at his majesty’s pleasure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If someone intended to kill or cause injury to a pregnant mother, can that intention support a charge of murder in respect of the baby if it goes on to die after being born alive?

A

No- but it may support a charge of manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Murder is committed when a person unlawfully kills another human being under the Queen’s Peace, with malice aforethought.

What is excluded concerning “Under the Queen’s Peace”?

A

Deaths caused during the legitimate prosecution of warfare (War Crimes Act 1991).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If a British citizen commits a murder anywhere in the world, can they still be tried in England or Wales?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the mens rea for murder as an intention?

A

To kill, or

To cause grievous bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In which situations is consent required before proceedings can be instituted for a ‘fatal offence’?

A

s2 Law Reform Act 1996

(a) The injury alleged to have caused the death was sustained more than 3 years before death occurred, or
(b) The person has previously been convicted of an offence committed in circumstances alleged to be connected to the death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the offence of involuntary manslaughter?

A

Common Law

Unlawful killing of another human being.

Occurs where the defendant causes the death of another but is not shown to have had the required mens rea for murder (intention to kill or GBH) nor involve the special defences as per voluntary manslaughter.

Divided into:

Kill another by an unlawful act which was likely to cause bodily harm, or
Kills another by gross negligence.
Penalty:
- Indictment – Life imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Involuntary manslaughter

What is gross negligence?

A

Gross negligence is a matter of fact for the jury and means the “lack of slight diligence or care” or “a conscious, voluntary act or omission in reckless disregard of a legal duty and of the consequences to another party.

Civil liability is not enough (being responsible for actions and practices that could damage others, but which aren’t criminal).

For example, a duty of care in a care home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Involuntary manslaughter

What three elements to the offence of manslaughter by an unlawful act must you prove?

A
  1. An unlawful act (constitutes a criminal offence in its own right, e.g arson)
  2. That the unlawful act is likely to cause bodily harm (emotional/ psychological not enough).
  3. The defendant had the mens rea for the unlawful act which led to the death (cannot rely on voluntary intoxication, e.g drug-induced hallucination).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Causing or Allowing a Child or Vulnerable Adult to Die or Suffer Serious Harm

A

s5 Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004

(1) A person (“D”) is guilty of an offence if—
(a) a child (under 16) or vulnerable adult (“V”) dies or suffers serious physical harm as a result of the unlawful act of a person who—

(i) was a member of the same household as V, and
(ii) had frequent contact with him,

(b) D was such a person at the time of that act,
(c) at that time there was a significant risk of serious physical harm being caused to V by the unlawful act of such a person, and
(d) either D was the person whose act caused the death or serious physical harm or—

(i) D was, or ought to have been, aware of the risk mentioned in paragraph (c),
(ii) D failed to take such steps as he could reasonably have been expected to take to protect V from the risk, and
(iii) the act occurred in circumstances of the kind that D foresaw or ought to have foreseen.

Penalty:
Indictment –
- Where the child/ vulnerable adult dies = 14 years imprisonment and/ or a fine.
- Where the child/ vulnerable adult suffers serious physical harm = 10 years imprisonment and/ or a fine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Murder

What is ‘unlawful killing’?

A

Can be an act or omission to act.

Excludes killing where there may be justifiable reasons e.g self-defence.

Soldiers and Police may be excluded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Murder

What is ‘another human being’?

A

Decided cases tell us that a person ceases to be a human being when their brain stem ceases to be active, regardless of being artificially kept alive.

‘Another human being’ includes a baby born alive with an existence independent of the mother (when fully expelled from the womb, and the umbilical cord does not need to be cut).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Murder

What is ‘malice afterthought’?

A

Specific intent offence to kill or cause GBH.

Needn’t be any premeditation on planning necessarily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Murder

What is required before proceeding for a ‘fatal offence’?

A

Attorney General consent.

IF injury sustained thought to have caused it, is more than 3 years before death occurs OR the person has been convicted of, for example, a GBH for the same injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
A
17
Q
  1. If a person injures a baby in the womb, intending to kill the mother and the baby is born and then goes on to die from injuries =
  2. If a person injures a baby in the womb, intending to GBH mother and baby dies =
A
  1. Murder
  2. Manslaughter
18
Q

What is voluntary manslaughter?

What special defences allow for conviction of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder (not attempted murder)?

A

The accused has the MENS REA for murder, the elements of murder therefore exist (intent to kill/ GBH).

  1. Diminished responsibility
  2. Loss of control
  3. Suicide pact

Can still be sentenced to life imprisonment.

19
Q

Special defences allow for conviction of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder

Diminished responsibility

A

s2 Homicide Act 1957

(a) Significant mental abnormality from a medical condition.

(b) Substantial impairment to;
- Understand the nature of the conduct.
- Form a rational judgment
- To exercise self-control

…and therefore provides an explanation for the act

20
Q

Special defences allow for conviction of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder

Examples of Potential Diminished responsibility

A

s2 Homicide Act 1957

Abnormality of mind
Post-natal/ pre-menstrual symptoms,
Grief reaction
Battered wife syndrome

21
Q

Special defences allow for conviction of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder

Loss of control

A

s54 Coroners and Justice Act 2009

The loss of control must be attributable to (but not incited or instigated by)…

  1. Fear of Serious Violence (not in the future)
  2. Things done or said of grave character justifying a sense of being seriously wronged.

Would a similar person of age, sex, degree of tolerant and self-restraint have reacted in the same or in a similar way?

22
Q

Special defences allow for conviction of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder

Suicide Pact

A

s4 Homicide Act 1957

Common agreement between two or more persons with a settled intention of all to die.

Burden of proof lies with the accused. He/ she must show that:

A suicide pact had been made, and
He/she had intention of dying at the time the killing took place.

23
Q

Special defences allow for conviction of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder

Suicide Pact Case Study

A

R v Sweeney (1986) is an example that may come up; husband and wife, take an overdose and intend to burn together in the car and die. Both try to escape at the last minute, he lives, she dies. He pleaded guilty and was convicted of manslaughter.

24
Q

What notable act does not apply when considering an unlawful act within involuntary manslaughter?

A

Drug supply as the chain of causation is broken and the individual exercised free will.

25
Q

What is corporate manslaughter?

A

s1 Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007

Organisation guilty if the way in which activities are managed and organised causes a person’s death and amounts to a gross breach of the duty of care owed.

Needs Director of Public Prosecution authority for prosecution.

Available in the UK/ UK territorial waters.

Penalty:
- Unlimited fine or remedial action.

26
Q

The offence of Encouraging/ Assisting Suicide

A

s2 Suicide Act 1961

(1) A person (“D”) commits an offence if—
(a) D does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the suicide or attempted suicide of another person, and
(b) D’s act was intended to encourage or assist suicide or an attempt at suicide.

Offence complete regardless of outcome.
Defendant need not know the victim.
Needs Director of Public Prosecution authority for prosecution.
Penalty:
- Indictment – 14 years

27
Q

Solicitation of Murder

A

s4 Offences Against the Persons Act 1861

Whosoever shall solicit, encourage, persuade, or endeavour to persuade, or shall propose to any person, to murder any other person is guilty.

Proposed victim can be outside the UK.

Offence is complete when someone is in receipt of the solicitation request, eg if the defendant posts it.

Penalty:
- Indictment – Life imprisonment

28
Q

True or False

Death has to occur within a year and a day for murder to be tried.

A

False – this was abolished with Section 1 of the Law Reform Act 1996.

29
Q

Question: Tim, Nick and Sally make the decision that they wish to end their lives. They get 5 capsules of cyanide and 1 harmless capsule. They mix the capsules up and Tim goes first placing a capsule in Nicks mouth. Nick falls dead at the table. Sally chooses a capsule and places it in Tim’s mouth, he falls dead. Sally takes a capsule and swallows it bit services and realises her tablet was harmless. Sally is terrified and at that point does not want to die. She runs away.

In relation to suicide pacts, if Sally is to use the special defence to murder, what must be shown?

A

That a suicide pact existed and Sally intended to kill herself next.

30
Q

Question: Margaret is a drug dealer. She bullies one of her runners Dennis into dealing for her. She has previously threatened Dennis with a knife and assaulted him. Dennis is terrified of Margaret. One morning Dennis sees Margaret walking down some steps. Margaret puts her arms up in a threatening manner causing Dennis to run and trip over a wall. He falls ten feet and dies instantly. Margaret had actually not seen Dennis and the waving of her arms was directed to another runner behind him.

Is Margaret guilty of manslaughter by unlawful act?

A

For an offence of manslaughter by unlawful act, all of the following must be present:

The accused must have CAUSED the death of another.
The killing must have OCCURED in the COURSE of the accused unlawful act.
The unlawful act must have been DANGEROUS ie exposing the deceased to harm.
The defendant had the required MENS REA for the unlawful act.

31
Q

Regarding loss of control as one of the special defences for involuntary murder, does the loss of control need to be sudden?

A

s54 Coroners and Justice Act 2009

NO

32
Q

Sections 54 and 55 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 provides guidance where the defendant was seriously wronged and had a justifiable sense to act in the manner that they did.

How is this decided?

A

It is for the jury to decide, by applying an objective test.

33
Q

Can someone acting in a considered desire for revenge rely on a defence of loss of control if they lose control in the process as a result of a qualifying trigger?

A

No