lecture 3 and 4 - the European Commision Flashcards

1
Q

Art. 2 Treaty of the European Union
European values

A
  1. respect for human dignity
  2. freedom
  3. democracy
  4. equality
  5. rule of law
  6. respect for human rights, including minorities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

institutions - different views

A
  • neorealism: states are central in IR (e.g. Maersheimer)
    states imposed limitations on themselves with institutions (they don’t emerge from nothing)
  • Alan Mirward 1992: ‘The European rescue of the nation state’ (member states wanted to rebuild own states, EU was guarantor
  • institutional approaches: institutions matter:
    1. they alter state preferences
    2. alter power structures
    3. provide normative environments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

political system of the EU

A

Art.9 Treaty on the EU outlines all formal institutions: EP, Council, European Council, European Commission, Court of Justice of the EU, ECB, Court of Auditors

EU Council and President

core (legislation)

  • European Commission
  • Council of ministers
  • EP

next to that:

  • advisory bodies (EESC, CoR agencies)
  • controlling bodies (ECJ, ECA)
  • financial bodies (CB)

spread everywhere = lobbyists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Art. 9 discription Commission

A

the commission = to promote and act on the general interest of the EU

(problem: what is the general interest of the EU?)

*points to supranationality EU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4 roles of the commission

A
  1. guardian of the treaties and the legal framework
  2. initiator of law
  3. external negotiator (e.g. in trade)
  4. manager of EU finances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the commission as guardian of the treaties and of the legal framework

A

infringement EU laws/treaties =
*infringement concerns everyday compliance

  • country fails to (correctly) implement
  • country refuses to (correctly) implement
  • country delays implementation (most often)

when the Commission becomes aware of infringement:

  1. letter of formal notice (request explanation)
  2. reasoned opinion (after reply to the letter of notice, if it is unsatisfactory, it argues why it finds something ‘‘unconstitutional’’)
  3. Commission can bring member states before the Court of Justice

actions against firms can happen when:

  1. breach EU law on restrictive practices + abuse dominant market position
  2. breach EU law on state aid
  3. potentially breaking EU laws on company mergers (competition concerns)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

guardian of the treaty case of Poland + Hungary

A

Poland and the ‘rule of law’ procedure

rule of law principle is crucial for the EU, Poland 2015 breached this principle: politicization judge appointments (-> no separation powers + no independent judiciary) + less independence media

  • Art.7 Treaty on EU: Commission or EP can refer state to the Council if it seriously breaches the core principles of the EU
    *this is something everyone wants to avoid

taking confidence from Art.7, wanting to avoid it, the Commission adopted the ‘rule of law procedure’:

  1. commission assessment
  2. commission recommendation
  3. monitoring of the follow-up

Poland argued the Commission acted outside of its mandate, now there is a new gov. that has worked Poland out of the procedure with a plan to restore rule of law principle

Hungary

  • repeated rule of law violations by Orban
  • dec. 2022: Commission blocks funds -> Hungary changed, but not all Commission concerns were adopted
  • feb 2024: Commission proceeding against Hungary’s ‘sovereignty law’ with a letter of notice (step 1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the commission as initiator of law

A

it makes secondary law (more detailed)
- primary law= treaties

types of secondary law:

  1. regulation = directly and immediately binding in their entirety (in all member states)
    often: rules of procedure or technical standards
  2. directives = binding in terms of goals, MS may choose how to achieve the directives
  3. decisions = binding, but targeted at specific member states, individuals or institutions
  4. recommendations = not binding
  5. opinions = not binding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the commission as external negotiator

A
  • often main/only EU negotiator in bi-/multi-lateral trade negotiations with non-MS
  • main negotiator/manager of EU cooperation and association agreements beyond trade
  • deals & negotiates (next to MS) with non-MS in respect to many ‘internal’ policies (e.g. environment, energy, transport)
  • main coordinator of EU emergency and humanitarian aid
  • participates in works of IOs (WTO, FAO, UN, OECD)
  • contributes to major part of staff to >140 EU delegations around the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

e.g. commission as external negotiator - transatlantic relations and the tariffs on steel

A
  1. Trump meeting with lobbyists about steel and aluminium industries
  2. Trump wants to put US first -> tariffs
  3. EU complains about Tariffs on Steel that are detrimental to EU
  4. Commission (Malstrom + Juncker): EU should be excluded from additional tariffs on US imports . IF NOT: retaliation measures including agriculture (would mean Trump would get less votes)
  5. no additional tariffs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EU budgets / Commission as manager of EU finances

A
  • responsible for drafting and implementing the budget
  • Council and EP control the upper limits and take framework spending decisions
  • MFF = Multiannual Financial Framework
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

structure of the Commission

A

more political

  • president chosen by QMV in the European Council
  • one commissioner per country -> 27 commissioners
    ! commissioners are approved individually by EP: individual hearings
    ! the EP can only dismiss the Commission altogether (not a single commissioner)
  • College of Commissioners = each commissioner one vote
  • each commissioner has own Cabinet
  • Directorates General corresponding to portfolio Commissioner (e.g. DG trade, DG environment)
  • horizontal services: secretariat general + legal service, translation services

more technical

core rules = impartiality and collegiality (meaning everyone supports a decision after it is made)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

whom do commissioners represent?

A

Treaty = general interest EU = impartial

expectation at home / press = represent national interest

-> supranational?

e.g. Hungary Commissioner Navcracsics rebuked by Juncker for representing national interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

priorities current Commission

A

= political (!the commission is more political/supranational than technical)

current Commission = Von der Leyen (2019-2024)

  • green deal
  • digital strategy
  • economy
  • stronger EU in the world
  • promoting EU way of life (=controversial)
  • push democracy (no online hate and disinformation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how does the College of Commissioners work?

A

= political tasks

meets at least once a week, chaired by the Commission President

usually decisions by consensus, simple majority vote is possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how do Directorates General work

A

= technical tasks

responsible for policy initiation and management

DGs broadly aligned with the competence of the Commissioners across the Commission

problems:

  • difficulty with horizontal coordination within DGs and across the European Commission (between different DGs)

!don’t treat the Commission as a ‘bloc’

e.g. DGs: agriculture, budget, climate action, communication, competition

17
Q

current discussion: Spitzenkandidaten

A

concerns election President Commission: democratic deficit

how does it work?

  1. European Council makes proposal via QMV (taking EP elections into account)
  2. EP elects candidate by absolute majority
  3. ‘vote of consent’ by EP for all commissioners (incl. president and HRVP)
  4. formal appointment by QMV European Council

2014 Spitzenkandidaten idea: winner EP will be nominated for Commission President -> more interest in EP elections
- heads of MS were not happy: less room to choose, not per se trust in candidate etc. (especially Merkel and David Cameron)

in the end the Council went along with the idea of Spitzkandidaten: chose Juncker

still: no complete acceptance: before 2019 elections made clear Council would decide, not election (Tusk, European Council President 2018)

-> 2019 Ursula von der Leyen was chosen (was not one of the 6 Spitzenkandidaten)

the end of spitzenkandidaten?
no: idea is too strong + too much support + Ursula von der Leyen ‘24 also Spitzenkandidat

18
Q

goals 19/24 commission

A
  1. European Green Deal
  2. A Europe fit for the Digital Age
  3. An economy that works for people
  4. A stronger Europe in the world
  5. Promoting EU way of life ( = controversial, not most fortunate wording)
  6. New push for European democracy (protection from external inference, spread misinformation and online hate messages)