Terms of The Contract Flashcards

1
Q

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith 1965

A

SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR SKILL
Dick was an expert dealer and sold the car to Smith informing him the car had only done 20,000miles
However after it was found to have done alot more than that.
Court held C relied on Ds expert knowledge - Term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Couchman v Hill

A

IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT
Plantiff said he only wanted an unserved heifer, after sale was found to be pregnant. Plantiff sued for breach due to the importance of the representation
Court held was Term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Routledge v Mackay

A

AGREEMENTS IN WRITING
Signed contract of sale for a 1942 motorcycle. was found not be 1942.
As date of motorcyle wasnt speicifed in writing then oral representaion did not matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Parol Evidence Rule

A

Under this rule, where there is a written contract, extrinsic evidence cannot change the terms laid down in writting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rectification - Exception Parol Evidence

A

Where document is intended to record a previous oral agreement, but failed to do that accurately - Extrinsic evidence is admitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Partially written contracts - Exception Parol Evidence

A

Where a written contract was intended to be qualifed by other written or oral terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dependent on fufilment of Specified Event - Exception Parol Evidence

A

Parol rule does not apply to extrinsic evidence which shows that the written contract was intended to come into force in particular circumstance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pym v Campbell

A

Parties orally agreed that their contract would only come into force after their invention was approved by expert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evidence about parties - Exception Parol Evidence

A

Extrinsic evidence can be used to show capacities in which parties were acting in when they made the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Proving Custom - Exception Parol Evidence

A

Where a custom needs to be explained or proved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Smith v Wilson

A

1,000 rabbits in local custom was known to mean 1,200

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Officious Bystander Test

A

Term left out by mistake, becuase parties thought it was too obvious to include

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Shirlaw v Southern Foundaries - Mackinson LJ

A

OBY Test “Its so obvious it goes wihtout saying”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Buissness Efficacy Test - Lord Sumption

A

“A term can only be implied if wihtout the term, the contract would lack commerical or practicle coherence”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Moorcock 1889

A

Contract to use jetty and wharf in order to load and store cargo from the Moorcock, Plantiff ship ran aground due to low water levels
Court held that D was liable as jetty and wharf could not be used unless river was safe - BE Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire

A

Even though the contested terms were not expressly stated in the contract. The hirer was bound by the owners usual terms which were common in the trade

17
Q

Hutton v Warren

A

Local Custom meant that at the end of an agricultural lease a tenant farmer was entitled to an allowence for seed and labour on the land
Court implied these terms in light of custom

18
Q

Poussard v Spiers and Pond

A

An actress failed to turn up for first performance
Court held this was a condition - Contract repudiated

19
Q

Bettini v Gye

A

Singer did not turn up for some of the rehearsals
Court held was condition - Not able to repudiate

20
Q

HK Shipping v Kawasaki

A

Term of contract was ship must be “in every way fitted for ordinary cargo usage”. In this case a problem with ships engines was considered a warranty so only damages