Duress by threats, circumstances and necessity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Duress by threats

A

D has been forced to commit a crime because of a threat made to them
- defined in AG V Whelan

Common law defence - Full defence = D acquitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R V Howe and R v Gotts

A

Duress never a defence to:
MURDER - Howe
or
ATTEMPTED MURDER - Gotts

R v Wilson confirmed decision in Gotts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elements for duress by threats

A

Elements set out in R V Hasan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. The threats must have been to cause death or serious injury

AND

must be effective at the time

A

R V Valderrama-vaga
D illegally imported coke, claimed mafia type org had threatened him with death, finaccial threats and threats to reveal homosexulality
(JUDGES ENTITLED TO LOOK AT CUMULATIVE THREATS MADE)

where there has been a death threat, judges entitled to consider all other threats if made
Eg, threat to reveal homosexuality alone would be insufficient
_____________________________________

the threat doesn’t need to be carried out immediately - threat must be ‘present’

R V Hudson and Taylor - 2 teen girls committed perjury (perverting the court of justice) - Saw the violent man in the court public gallery, had been told he would cut them up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. threat must be directed against;
A

D themselves
Immediate family member
someone close to them
someone they would regard reasonably responsible for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Did the D act reasonably?
A

R V Graham = the Graham Test;
(shows how defense is not available if D because intoxicated voluntarily)

1) was D compelled to act as they did because they had good reason to fear serious injury/death? (sub)

2) Would a sober person of reasonable firmness sharing the characteristics of the D responded in the same way? (obj)
|
|
R V Bowen sets out the characteristics that effect the objective element;
- age
- pregnancy
- serious physical disability
- recognized mental illness
- gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. Crime must be related to the threat
A

R V Cole
- D’s himself, his gf and child had been threatened in order to make him repay money he owed = robbed building societies to get this money

the threat was not to commit robbery = no defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Threat must be imminent (D couldn’t have taken evasive action)
A

R V gill/ R V Abdul Hussain
- if D has “safe avenue of escape”= cannot rely on duress

Abdul hussain = D’s were shia muslims who had fled to sudan from iraq to avoid exectution due to religion, they hijacked the plane as they feared they would be taken back to iraq

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. where D layed hiself open to threats = No defence
A

Gang Cases

R V Sharp = joined gang who carried out armed robberies (knew what he signed up for), wished to leave, but threatened
took part in robbery where someone was killed in post office

VS

R V Shepard
D joined shoplifting gang, threatened when he tried to leave, charged with burglary but conviction quashed - D DIDNT sign up for burglaries, so future burglaries could now use the defence (not the previous shoplifting)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Intoxication and threats
A

if D mistakens threat because voluntarily intoxicated they cannot use the defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Duress of circumstances

A

D has been forced to commit a crime due to the circumstances dictating them rather than the threat of a person
all duress rules still apply

Circumstance where D feels there is a likely hood of dearth or injury

Martin - drove son to work (at risk of loosing his job) despite being disqualified because wife threatened suicide

Willer - drove on pavement to escape gang of youths, drove to police station to report the incident

R V Conway = D speeding as he thought that the car behind him was the car involved in a shooting previously with the passenger of the car, in fact it was the police

Abdul Hussain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Necessity

A

Re. Conjoined Twins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly