1945-1975 international relations: the Cold War and relations with the USSR and China; the Vietnam War Flashcards

1
Q

Why did the USA become involved in a Cold War in the years 1945-51?

A

In 1945, the USA had a monopoly on nuclear weapons. By the end of the decade, this was to end. While after 1945 there was concern that the USSR was spreading its rule into Eastern Europe, by 1950 there was the realisation that Communism was a worldwide issue. If the USA was to prevent the spread of Communism, it was therefore making a global commitment. China fell to the Communists in
1949. In 1950, the USA became involved in a full-scale war in Korea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were Post-war relations Like for the US?

A

The USA had been an unlikely ally of the USSR during the Second World War. Once the common enemy of Nazi Germany was defeated, their differences began to emerge.

The Soviet leader, Stalin, could argue that his country had suffered grievously during the war: possibly as many as 27 million dead, with 25 million homeless and 6 million buildings destroyed. Nazi Germany, with whom it had a treaty of non-aggression, had invaded the USSR without warning. Nine of its fifteen republics had been fought over during the war. The USSR wanted the security of knowing that it could not be attacked without warning again. The best way to ensure this was to control its neighbours, so that they might act as a buffer zone between the USSR and the rest of Europe.
By invading Eastern European countries such as Poland in the latter stages of the war, it demonstrated that it would maintain a considerable influence on them in the future.

At a series of meetings with Allied leaders towards the end of the war, Stalin presented this as a done deal. At Yalta in February 1945, Roosevelt, visibly ill, seemed to sympathise with Stalin. It was agreed, for example, that Germany should be divided and forced to pay war reparations, half of which would go to the USSR. The USSR should gain land from Poland and in turn Poland should be compensated with land from Germany.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the Truman Doctrine?

A

In 1947, Truman had offered the support of the USA to countries struggling against Communism. In a speech Truman said:

I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support peoples who resist being enslaved by armed minorities or by outside pressure. I believe that we must help free peoples to work out their own destiny in their own way.

The policy was known as the Truman Doctrine or containment because it seemed to imply the USA would stem the spread of Communism. The doctrine was first applied in Greece to give aid to the non-Communist forces. Greece did not become Communist; hence the first intervention appeared successful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Truman treat the Cold War?

A

In April, Roosevelt died. His successor, Harry S. Truman, seemed more critical of Stalin. Unlike Roosevelt, and indeed Churchill, Truman had not had the experience of co-operating with Stalin to defeat a common enemy. The USA had not suffered during the War in any way commensurate with the USSR. It had endured less than two per cent of the human losses of the USSR. Roosevelt had considered this fact in his responses to Soviet demands; Truman did not. The next meeting at Potsdam in July, in which Britain also had a new leader, was less amicable although the Yalta agreements were confirmed. In an extensive poll, 50 per cent of Americans still felt that wartime co-operation between the two superpowers should continue.

By this time Stalin was imposing Communist regimes on many of the countries liberated’ from Nazi influence or occupied by the Soviets. In Romania, for example, at a meeting with the Soviet deputy foreign minister, the King was given two hours to introduce a pro-Communist government.

While Truman was clearly worried about this forcing of Communism on Eastern European countries, he could do little about what had already happened in areas where there were still Soviet armies of occupation. However, he was increasingly concerned that Communism should not spread to countries not currently under Soviet control.

To Truman it seemed that the USSR was seeking not just to protect its borders from any future invasion, but rather to control the whole of Europe. In 1946, Winston Churchill, visiting Fulton, Missouri, spoke of an Iron Curtain descending through the middle of Europe. This seemed even more pertinent when the Soviets forced Czechoslovakia to adopt Communism in 1948.
Countries such as Romania, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria and Yugoslavia were now governed by Communists. Only Greece, where a civil war was taking place between Communist and non-Communist forces, held out against Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe. People said a state of Cold War had developed between the USA and USSR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What Marshall Aid did the US provide to Eastern European countries?

A

In the following year the USA went further, offering a $13 billion package to help European countries to recover from the effects of the Second World War.
This was Marshall Aid, named after the US Secretary of State General George Marshall. A conference of 22 nations was set up to assess the economic needs of the affected countries. The USSR did not attend and refused permission for countries under its sphere of influence to do so. Eventually sixteen Western European nations formed the Organisation of European Economic Cooperation (OFEC) to spend this money. The aid was in part intended to help countries to recover their prosperity so that Communism would lose any appeal. The aid did help Western European countries to recover economically and fears of Communism in countries such as Italy and France receded.

In the ensuing years, however, two crises emerged in which direct confrontation between the USA and USSR seemed likely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What Happened in Berlin in 1948-49?

A

Germany had been divided into four zones of occupation following the end of the war. The capital, Berlin, was also divided although it physically lay within the Soviet zone. The Western occupying powers, the USA, Britain and France, relied on Soviet goodwill to travel through its zone to their sectors in Berlin.
By 1948, it was clear that the three Western sectors were co-operating and recovery was well on the way through Marshall Aid. In contrast, the Soviet zone remained poor. Increasingly, it was having Communism imposed upon it.

In June 1948, the Western zones introduced a new common currency, the Deutschmark. When their leaders tried to introduce it into their sectors of Berlin, Stalin ordered all transport links with the West cut. He believed he could blockade Berlin into accepting Communist rule and therefore make the capital part of the future Communist East German state.

In retaliation Britain and the USA organised an airlift of essential supplies to the city under siege. By March 1949, 8,000 tons of supplies per day were being delivered despite Soviet threats to the aircraft, which were of course flying through Communist-controlled airspace. On 9 May, Stalin called off the blockade and things returned to normal. It appeared that in the first great confrontation, the USA had won.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What led to the development of NATO and what did NATO state?

A

The Berlin Crisis had confirmed Truman’s commitment to containment in Europe and highlighted the Soviet threat to Western Europe. Western European states, even joined together, were no match for the Soviet Union and needed the formal support of the USA. In April 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was signed. Although a defensive alliance, its main purpose was to prevent Soviet expansion.

The countries agreed that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America would be considered an attack against them all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What led to the US involvement in the Korean War, 1950-53, and what took place?

A

Korea is a country in Asia that shares a border with both the USSR and China.
Following the Second World War it was divided into North and South with a border at the 38th parallel (a line of latitude). While the government of the South supported the USA, that of the North was Communist and hostile. In March 1950, North Korea invaded the South. The UN sent forces to stop this invasion; the vast majority were American under an American Commander, General Douglas MacArthur.

UN forces succeeded in liberating South Korea. However, on MacArthur’s urging, they then went on to invade the North, ignoring China’s warnings of the consequences. President Truman faced tremendous hostility within the USA when he fired MacArthur for going beyond his instructions. To many it seemed he was soft on Communism. Some felt UN troops should have finished off North Korea and then invaded China itself to reverse the Communist threat.

In the meantime, China became involved in the war, sending thousands of troops to help the North Koreans. The war effectively became a stalemate for three years. The USA alone lost 27,000 troops and one million Korean civilians died. In 1953, a peace of sorts was agreed in which Korea remained divided into a Communist North and non-Communist South. It is known now that the Soviets secretly sent air forces to help the North Koreans. Had this been known at the time, the consequences could have been profound, with the confrontation between the USA and the USSR possibly spreading to Europe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the result of the Korean War?

A

The USA had learned that Communism was a global issue and if they were to prevent its spread then a global commitment was necessary. In the early 1950s, President Eisenhower spoke of the domino theory. While the policy may appear incredibly simplistic, it was nevertheless a deeply held view and was later used to justify full-scale US involvement in the Vietnam War.

In its second phase, the war had been in effect a Sino-American war. Sino-American hostility was greatly increased, and the United States gave increased support to Taiwan. Moreover, it helped to sustain McCarthyism and generally worsened the Cold War antagonism. However, the three leading powers showed that they were unwilling to risk World War Ill. The sacking of MacArthur signalled that America planned to stick to containment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

To what extent was there a thaw in the Cold War during Eisenhower’s presidency?

A

President Eisenhower and his Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, appeared to be real ‘Cold Warriors. They had attacked Truman and the Democrats for being soft on Communists’ in the presidential election campaign of 1952. America was very much in the grip of McCarthyism and Eisenhower and Dulles talked about a ‘roll back’ (of Communism) and ‘massive retaliation’ as they planned to base American defence on nuclear weaponry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was Eisenhower and Krushchevs relationship like?

A

In 1955, Nikita Khrushchev succeeded Stalin as leader of the Soviet Union. His response to Eisenhower was a mixture of conciliation and provocation. He tried to stir up the West Europeans to halt German rearmament and to win friends in the Middle East. In order to tighten the Soviet bloc militarily, he created the Warsaw Pact.

On the other hand, Khrushchev returned a naval base to Finland and decreased the Red Army by half a million men. He agreed to talks on agriculture and the peaceful use of atomic energy with the USA. In May 1955, he signed the Austrian peace treaty, under which the four occupying powers at last got out of Austria, which became an independent and neutral state. The Soviet Union had thus surrendered territory for the first time since the Second World War.

However, Eisenhower was not convinced by these policies, believing that this was simply a new style of leadership rather than a change in their basic aim of expansion. This seemed to be confirmed by events in Hungary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What Happened in Hungary in 1956?

A

In 1956, Khrushchev began a policy of relaxing the controls Stalin had imposed on Eastern Europe. However, when moderate Communists in Hungary, led by Imre Nagy, threatened to leave the Warsaw Pact, Khrushchev sent in tanks to quell the rebellion. Nagy was removed and shot, and a more acceptable leader, Janos Kadar, took over. In spite of appeals by the rebels, the US government did not intervene. A more moderate government in Hungary might have helped the USA ‘contain’ the Soviet Union, but the risks of intervention were thought to be too high. Moreover, the USA was preoccupied with the Suez crisis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happened in Berlin in 1959/60?

A

Khrushchev faced problems over Germany. First, the West refused to recognise the legitimacy of the East German state. Secondly, America, Britain and France used West Berlin for espionage and sabotage. Khrushchev tried to force the West to recognise East Germany, by threatening to give East Germany control of the West’s access routes to West Berlin. Then he gave the West an ultimatum that they must do something about West Berlin within six months, or face dire consequences (November 1958). However, when it became clear that the West would stand firm, Khrushchev backed down in March 1959.

Khrushchev and Eisenhower had their first ever summit meeting in September 1959. Although the atmosphere was surprisingly relaxed, they made no progress on Berlin. Khrushchev hoped for a Berlin agreement at the Paris summit in May 1960. However, this summit failed as, just before the meeting, the Soviet Union shot down a U-2 American spy-plane and captured the pilot, Gary Powers. Eisenhower was forced to admit the plane’s intent and
Khrushchev refused to attend the summit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the Suez crisis?

A

In July 1956, the Egyptian leader, Gamal Nasser, took control of the Suez Canal, the important trade waterway that gave a quicker route from the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean. Britain and France were particularly angered and with Israel’s help, invaded the Canal Zone. They were not supported by the USA who forced them to withdraw by the use of financial sanctions. Eisenhower wanted to keep in with the Arab nations, believing the Western world needed their oil and friendship against the Communist bloc. In addition, Eisenhower was furious that Britain, France and Israel had acted without keeping him informed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the results of the Suez crisis?

A

The crisis illustrated that Britain and France were no longer world powers and were heavily dependent on the USA. Moreover, it increased American involvement in the Middle East. In January 1957, Eisenhower asked Congress for military and economic aid for any Middle East country that was threatened by aggression or subversion. This became known as the Eisenhower Doctrine and was an extension of containment to the Middle East.

However, Egypt and Syria turned increasingly to the USSR, as the Anglo-French actions had reminded them of the Western ‘colonial’ mentality. Both the USA and the USSR gave and/or sold increasing amounts of armaments to their allies in this area.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

To what extent was the US involved in the Chinese civil war, 1945-49, and further up until 1960?

A

The USA was involved in the Chinese Civil War in the years 1945-49. The USA gave aid to Chiang Kai-shek and the Chinese Nationalists in their struggle against Mao and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). However, by 1949 the USA had abandoned Chiang, who fled with thousands of followers to the island of Taiwan.
America was unhappy with Mao’s success in late 1949, fearing that other Asian countries might follow China’s lead.

The United States refused to formally recognise the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and, instead, the USA maintained diplomatic relations with the Republic of China government in Taiwan, recognising it as the sole legitimate government of China. After the Civil War, the USA seemed to lose interest in China. However, the Korean War changed the US attitude. Truman sent the US Seventh Fleet to the Taiwan Straits and relations with China remained cool during the presidency of Eisenhower.

The USA hated Communism and was convinced that Beijing was Moscow’s puppet. Dulles, the US Secretary of State under Eisenhower, insisted that Chinese Communism was more threatening than Soviet Communism. China had more people and greater cultural influence and prestige in Asia. There were major Chinese minorities in most nations in Asia and other Asian nations were relatively weak.

Mao hated capitalism, felt that America was imperialistic and resented American aid to Chiang during and after the Civil War.

The USA interpreted the Korean War as a sign that Chinese-sponsored Communism was expansionist and threatened US security. It convinced America that China was determined to aid revolutions throughout the world.

China interpreted the Korean War as a sign that the USA was aggressive, wanted to get a foothold on the Asian mainland and was likely to attack China itself.

Relations continued to deteriorate after the Korean War. The USA put a trade embargo on China and kept it out of the United Nations, as well as establishing military bases in Taiwan. Mao was infuriated by the US-Taiwan Defence Treaty, which was signed in 1954. In the following year, Communist China shelled the Chinese Nationalist islands of Quemoy and Matsu, which were very close to the Chinese mainland. Eisenhower hinted in public that he was considering the use of atomic weapons to protect Taiwan. Mao, furious and humiliated, backed down. There was a similar crisis in 1958 over the same two islands. Once again the USA threatened military action and Mao backed down.

17
Q

Why did the USA become involved in an arms race in the years 1945-60? (Atomic weapons)

A

Stalin had been shocked in 1945 by the news that the USA had tested its first atomic bomb. The Soviet atomic research programme was transformed over the next few years, partly due to the use of Soviet spies in the USA who were able to find out American atomic secrets. In 1949, the USSR exploded its first nuclear weapon. The USA had therefore lost its monopoly on atomic weapons. President Truman said the USA would seek to develop a hydrogen bomb, with as much as a thousand times the power of an atomic bomb. When this weapon was finally tested in Bikini Atoll in March 1954, both sides were entering into an arms race and developing weapons of mass destruction that could, if used, have led to the end of the world.

Eisenhower inherited the hydrogen bomb from Truman. Within a year (1953) the Soviets had caught up. Each superpower wanted more and better atomic weaponry than the other. The first American surface-to-surface ballistic missiles were tested in 1947. When the USSR’s long-range Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) was operational a few weeks before the American ICBM, America was humiliated. In 1954, America’s first nuclear-propelled submarine was operational and, in 1960, America tested a missile fired from a submerged submarine to hit any target on the globe. At this point, the Soviet navy was years behind the American navy.

18
Q

Why did the USA become involved in an arms race in the years 1945-60? (Military spending)

A

The prospect of other countries developing nuclear weapons meant the USA could be attacked. As a result, the military-industrial complex was to develop, with defence spending between $40 to $50 billion per year in the 1950s and 90 per cent of foreign aid to US allies going on military spending.

Billions of dollars were spent on maintaining a military presence throughout Western Europe and South-east Asia, equipping the armed forces, and weapons research and development. Defence establishments were built in otherwise poor areas such as the Southern states; often they were to be found in the areas represented by politicians on the appropriate committees in Congress. Desert areas in Arizona and New Mexico became centres for weapons testing. Many firms followed the military to their new bases, being awarded lucrative contracts to provide weapons, research and equipment. Some historians have argued that this post-war boom in military spending helped to smooth out the former economic inequalities within the USA. California, in particular, benefited from military contracts. One of the knock-on effects was the development of an industry in high technology that was to see it become the centre of the computer industry; the first IBM computer was introduced in 1953.

19
Q

To what extentaid US relations with the Soviet Union worsen in this
period?

A

The rivalry between the USA and the Soviet Union had intensified in the second half of the 1950s with the Soviet invasion of Hungary as well as the space and arms race.

20
Q

What was the Berlin wall crisis?

A

The Berlin Wall Crisis, 1961
Khrushchev remained determined to force the West out of Berlin (see page
211). In June 1961, he met Kennedy at Vienna and gave the US President an ultimatum: something had to be done about Berlin by December 1961 or Khrushchev would hand over the Berlin access routes to East Germany.

This ultimatum greatly increased Cold War tension. Then, in August 1961, Khrushchev ordered the construction of a wall to separate East Berlin from West Berlin. He believed he could bully the new, inexperienced president of the USA, Kennedy, especially after the Bay of Pigs fiasco (see page 250). There was tension after the construction of the Wall. From 5 p.m. on 27 October to 11 a.m. on 28 October, US and Soviet tanks, fully armed, faced each other in a tense stand-off. Then, after eighteen hours, the US tanks pulled back. Kennedy had been forced to back down but was furious with the USSR.
The Berlin Wall crisis was significant for several reasons:

In some ways it could be said to have brought some stability to Germany and Berlin, in that it finally sealed off the two Berlins.

It increased Cold War tension as both the USA and the USSR resumed nuclear testing.

Soviet propaganda claimed that the Wall was a success for Russia as the USA had been unable to prevent its construction. On the other hand, Western writers claimed that the Wall was a triumph because it showed that East Germany had to wall its people in.

Some historians believe Khrushchev saw it as a success and it encouraged him to place missiles in Cuba, leading to the Cuban missile crisis?

21
Q

What were the causes of the Cuban missle crisis?

A

The Cuban Missile Crisis, which took place over a few days in October 1962, brought the superpowers to the brink of nuclear war. The crisis showed how the Cold War had spread outside the confines of Europe to the wider world.

Cuba had been a thorn in the side of the USA since 1959, when a revolution had brought Fidel Castro to power. Castro had ejected all US businesses and investment. In retaliation, the USA refused to buy Cuba’s biggest export - sugar.
The Soviet Union offered to buy Cuban sugar. The Soviet leader, Khrushchev, was keen to extend Soviet influence in the Caribbean and wanted to out-manoeuvre John F. Kennedy, the inexperienced American president.

In April 1961, Kennedy sanctioned an invasion of Cuba by exiles who had left Cuba in 1959, which was to land in the Bay of Pigs, create a national uprising and overthrow Castro. The Bay of Pigs invasion was a disastrous failure due to poor planning and lack of support in Cuba, where Castro was popular. It was a humiliation for the USA, further strengthened Castro’s position in Cuba and drew Cuba even closer to the Soviet Union. At the end of 1961, Castro announced his conversion to Communism.

Khrushchev now saw the opportunity to further extend Soviet influence in Cuba. He was concerned by US missile bases in Italy and Turkey and wanted to establish Soviet bases in Cuba to redress the balance. In September 1962, Soviet technicians began to install ballistic missiles. On 14 October, an American U2 spy plane took photographs of Cuba which revealed that Soviet intermediate range missiles were being constructed. These were in range of almost all US cities and posed a serious threat to the country’s security.

22
Q

What were the events of the cuban missile crisis?

A

The crisis lasted over thirteen days in October 1962.

16 October
Kennedy was told that Khrushchev intended to build missile sites on Cuba.

18-19 October
Kennedy held talks with his closest advisers. The ‘Hawks’ wanted an aggressive policy, while the ‘Doves’ favoured a peaceful solution.

20 October
Kennedy decided to impose a naval blockade around Cuba to prevent Soviet missiles reaching Cuba. They searched any ship suspected of carrying arms or missiles.

21 October
Kennedy made a broadcast to the American people, informing them of the potential threat and what he intended to do.

23 October
Khrushchev sent a letter to Kennedy insisting that Soviet ships would force their way through the blockade.

24 October
Soviet ships approached the blockade line and then retreated. Khrushchev issued a statement insisting that the Soviet Union would use nuclear weapons in the event of a war.

25 October
Kennedy wrote to Khrushchev asking him to withdraw missiles from Cuba.

26 October
Khrushchev replied to Kennedy’s letter. He said he would withdraw the missiles if the USA promised not to invade Cuba and withdrew missiles from Turkey.

27 October
A US spy plane was shot down over Cuba. Robert Kennedy (brother of the President) agreed a deal with the Soviet Union. The USA would withdraw missiles from Turkey as long as it was kept secret.

28 October
Khrushchev accepted the deal and broadcast his answer on Radio Moscow.
The Voice of America radio station in Europe broadcast US acceptance.

23
Q

What was the result of the Cuban missile crisis?

A

The crisis had several important results. On the one hand, Kennedy seemed to have won the war of words and the perception was that Khrushchev had backed down, especially as the deal over Turkey was not disclosed at the time. The Americans felt that they had won some kind of victory. This led to over-confidence, especially in Vietnam. The Soviets were determined that they would never have to back down again. They worked hard and successfully to achieve nuclear parity by the end of the decade.

The superpowers had almost gone to war - a war that would have destroyed much of the world. There was a relief that the crisis was over and there was a great reduction in tension. To ensure that the two leaders did not have to communicate by letter in the case of a crisis, a hotline telephone link was established between the White House in Washington DC and the Kremlin in Moscow. Further improvements came when the Partial Test Ban Treaty was signed in August 1963, whereby both the USA and the USSR agreed to stop testing nuclear weapons in the atmosphere.

24
Q

What were US relations like with China under Nixon?

A

One of Nixon’s greatest achievements in foreign policy was to improve US relations with China, which had deteriorated since the Chinese Civil War of
1945-49 when the USA had provided aid to Mao’s opponent, Chiang (see page 215). They worsened even more during the Korean War (see pages 212-13) which the US interpreted as a sign that Chinese-sponsored Communism was expansionist. After the Korean War, the US put a trade embargo on China and kept it out of the UN. The US then established bases on Taiwan, which infuriated Mao.

25
Q

Why did relations improve with China?

A

In April 1971, the USA lifted its 21-year old trade embargo with China. There were several reasons for improved relations between the USA and China.

Relations between China and the USSR had worsened in the later 1960s, especially after the Chinese denounced the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. Nixon saw an opportunity to exploit this split between the two leading Communist nations. Nixon and Kissinger wanted to use China to counter Soviet power and force the USSR into détente.

Nixon also hoped that closer relations with China might help to end the war in Vietnam, as the Chinese were close allies of the North Vietnamese. This was another example of his policy of linkage.

Mao believed that China needed détente, especially the potential stimulus to Chinese trade and industry. He was also convinced that Nixon would withdraw US troops from Asia, especially Vietnam, which made America less of a threat than the Soviet Union.

26
Q

What was Ping-Pong diplomacy?

A

The new period of diplomacy began at the World Table Tennis Championship held in Japan on 6 April 1971, when the Chinese ping pong team formally invited the US team to play in their country on an all-expenses paid trip. When American player Glenn Cowan missed his team’s bus after practice, he was offered a ride by Chinese player, Zhuang Zedong. This friendly display of good will was well publicised and, later that day, the American team was formally invited to China. They were among the first group of US citizens permitted to visit China since 1949.

On 14 April 1971, the US Government lifted a trade embargo with China that had lasted over 20 years. Talks began to facilitate a meeting between top President Richard Nixon.

government officials and, eventually, a meeting between Mao Zedong and
The ‘ping-pong diplomacy’ was important because it led to the restoration of Sino-US relations, which had been cut for more than two decades. This triggered a series of other events, including the restoration of China’s legitimate rights in the United Nations by an overwhelming majority vote in October 1971, and the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and other countries.

27
Q

What were the reasons for detente?

A

This relaxation in relations was due to several reasons. The threat of a nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis had had a sobering effect on all concerned.
The hotline between the White House and the Kremlin improved the speed of communications and the Test Ban Treaty showed a willingness to look at the issue of developing nuclear missiles.

Both the USA and the USSR were keen on arms limitation talks as a means of reducing their ever-increasing defence spending. Nixon and his foreign policy adviser, Henry Kissinger, were fearful of the growing military strength of the USSR. They also knew that the American public and economy made it impossible to counter increased Soviet power with a massive arms race.
Containment had to be achieved by a different method - détente.

The USA’s involvement in Vietnam had not gone well and, by 1968, the USA was seeking to end the war. After Nixon became president, it was hoped that if the USA improved trade and technology links and made an offer of arms reduction, then Brezhnev might persuade his North Vietnamese ally to negotiate an end to the war. The idea of offering concessions was called ‘linkage’ by Nixon’s advisers. Nixon visited Moscow in 1972 and made it clear that he did not see Vietnam as an obstacle to détente.

Nixon had visited China three months earlier and the Soviet leader, Brezhnev, did not want to see a Chinese-US alliance develop. The Soviet leader was keen to gain access to US technology and further grain sales.

28
Q

What is SALT 1?

A

SALT stands for Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty and the first of these, SALT 1, was signed in 1972. Early in Nixon’s presidency, a decision was made to talk about nuclear weapons. Talks held in Helsinki and Vienna over a period of almost three years produced SALT 1, the first Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty, which imposed limits on the nuclear capability of the USSR and the USA. SALT I was significant because it was the first agreement between the superpowers that successfully limited the number of nuclear weapons they held.

29
Q

What was the Helsinki Agreements, 1975?

A

In the Helsinki Agreements the USA and the USSR, along with 33 other nations, made declarations about three distinct international issues (called
‘baskets’ by the signatories).

The West recognised the current national boundaries in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union accepted the existence of West Germany. West Germany renounced its claim to be the sole legitimate German state.

Each signatory agreed to respect human rights and basic freedoms such as thought, speech, religion and freedom from unfair arrest.

There was a call for closer economic, scientific and cultural links, which would lead to even closer political agreement.

30
Q

What were the reasons for US involvement in Vietnam?

A

During the 1950s the USA became far more involved in Vietnam as part of its policy of containment to stop the spread of Communism. The fundamental reason was the domino theory. The USA was convinced that if Vietnam fell to Communism it would be followed by its neighbouring states, especially Laos and Cambodia. American involvement increased in the years 1954-64.

During the elections of 1956 the USA was determined to prop up the government of South Vietnam and prevent any reunification with the Communist-controlled north. Indeed, the USA prevented the elections taking place realising that the Communists would win. South Vietnam was ruled by Diem. He was a corrupt and unpopular ruler whose government was propped up the USA which sent military advisers to train the South Vietnamese army. In 1959, Ho Chi Minh issued orders to the Vietminh (which became known as the Vietcong) to begin a terror campaign against the South.
In November 1963, Diem was overthrown and replaced by a series of short-lived and weak governments. The Vietcong became more popular in the South.

Under Kennedy, the USA tried to reduce Communist influence through the Strategic Hamlet policy. This involved moving peasants into fortified villages, guarded by troops. It did not stop the Communists and was very unpopular with the peasants.

By 1964, President Johnson wanted more direct military involvement in Vietnam but needed an excuse. On 2 August 1964, the US destroyer Maddox was fired at by North Vietnamese patrol boats in the Gulf of Tonkin. Two days later there was a second alleged attack. Evidence later showed that this second attack did not happen. Johnson was able to use these attacks to persuade Congress to support greater US involvement. Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution that gave Johnson the power to take any military measures he thought necessary to defend South Vietnam. Some people suggest that the administration engineered the Gulf of Tonkin Crisis as an excuse for much greater military involvement in Vietnam. At the time, 85 per cent of people supported this policy and no one in the House of Representatives and only two members of the Senate opposed the Resolution.

31
Q

What was Vietnam like during WWII?

A

In 1939, Vietnam was part of an area known as French Indo-China. This included contemporary Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Japan invaded and occupied Indo-China in 1940. In 1941, two leading Vietnamese Communists, Ho Chi Minh and Nguyen Vo Giap, a history teacher, set up the League for the Independence of Vietnam (or Vietminh) in southern Vietnam with the aim of establishing an independent Vietnam free from French and Japanese rule through guerrilla activities against the Japanese. In August 1945, the Japanese were defeated in the Second World War and Ho Chi Minh quickly announced that Vietnam was an independent and democratic republic. However, within weeks the French quickly restored control over Vietnam. The Vietminh, led by Ho Chi Minh, continued their guerrilla campaign against the French. The decisive battle for control of Vietnam took place at the French garrison of Dien Bien Phu in 1954. The Geneva Agreement of 1954 that followed divided Vietnam temporarily along the 17th parallel into North and South Vietnam. North Vietnam would be led by Ho Chi Minh and the South would be led by Ngo Dinh Diem.

32
Q

How did the strengths of the communists lead to US defeat?

A

One of the greatest strengths of the North Vietnamese and the Vietcong was that they were fighting for a cause - Communism and the reunification of Vietnam. They would not surrender, refused to give in to US bombing, and were prepared to accept very heavy casualties. In addition, there was an army in North Vietnam that played a significant role in the Tet Offensive of 1968.

The Vietcong fought a low-tech’ war using very successful guerrilla tactics which, for the most part, avoided pitched battles and reduced the effectiveness of the ‘high-tech’ methods and superior weaponry of the USA. These methods were ideally suited to the jungle terrain of South Vietnam.

The Vietcong feared US bombing raids. The Communist forces dug deep tunnels and used them as air-raid shelters. For example, the tunnels around Saigon ran for 320 km. These were self-contained and booby-trapped and provided not only refuge from the bombing, and a safe haven for the guerrilla fighters, but were also a death trap for the US forces and the Army of the Republic of South Vietnam (the AVRN).

In addition, many people living in the South supported the North and the Vietcong. Some believed in Communism and reunification and others were alienated by US tactics and brutality. Their support, in turn, made the Vietcong guerrilla tactics far more effective. Moreover, both the Soviet Union and China supported the reunification of Vietnam under the Communist North. They supplied the North and Vietcong with rockets, tanks and fighter planes.

33
Q

How did the weaknesses of the US lead to US defeat?

A

Many US troops were young, with some only nineteen years of age, inexperienced and unable to cope with guerrilla wartare, and most did not understand why they were fighting in Vietnam. This, in turn, led to a fall in morale with some resorting to drug-taking and brutal behaviour, such as the My Lai massacre where, in March 1968, US troops murdered 347 men, women and children.

There was also opposition at home (see page 266) due to the failure to achieve a quick victory, the casualty rate, with a total of 58,000 deaths, and the televised pictures showing the horrors of war such as the use of napalm. This opposition undermined the war effort.

The US army failed to develop an effective response to Vietcong guerrilla tactics. US tactics, especially search and destroy and chemical warfare, encouraged even greater peasant support for the Vietcong in the countryside.

The Tet Offensive had a disastrous effect on public opinion in the USA. On 31 January 1968, the Vietcong and North Vietnamese Army launched a massive attack on over 100 cities and towns in South Vietnam during the New Year, or Tet holiday. This proved an important turning-point in the conflict as it showed that the Vietcong could strike at the heart of the American-held territory, especially the capture of the US Embassy in Saigon. It brought a further loss of US military morale, suggested to the US public that the war was unwinnable, and fuelled further criticism of US involvement.

34
Q

What methods of warfare did the US use during the Vietnam war?

A

Operation Rolling Thunder’ - the US bombing campaign of North Vietnam that lasted three and a half years, from 1965 to 1968, in the hope of destroying Vietcong supply routes to the South. The USA also used chemical warfare, such as napalm, and defoliants to destroy the jungle cover for the Vietcong, such as
‘Agent Orange’, a highly toxic weed killer used to destroy the jungle.

In addition ‘Search and Destroy’ was introduced by the US commander, Westmoreland. This method used helicopters to descend on a village suspected of assisting the Vietcong forces and then to destroy it. The troops called these attacks ‘Zippo raids after the name of the lighters they used to set fire to the thatched houses of the villages.

35
Q

What was the impact of mass media on the war in vietnam?

A

Vietnam was the first television war. By the mid-1960s television was the most important source of news for the American public. During the Korean War of the early 1950s, only about ten per cent of US homes had television. Most of the newsreel film was taken by official military cameramen. However, by 1966, 93 per cent of homes had televisions and there was an estimated daily television audience of 50 million. Most Americans got their news from television, partly because the visual element of television made viewers feel that they were part of the action. Television reporters soon became household names. By 1967, 90 per cent of the evening news was devoted to the war.

In Vietnam, the news film was produced by the American IV networks, who were allowed to move freely and operate as they wished. There was no military censorship. Using lightweight cameras, they had easy access to events and could send their pictures back to the USA with great speed. American viewers could witness every mistake and defeat. They could see Americans bombing and shelling Vietnamese homes in Saigon after the Tet Offensive. Moreover, in the mid and later 1960s, colour television became more readily available, which worsened the bloody nature of what was shown.

36
Q

What was the significance of television coverage during vietnam?

A

There has been much debate about the significance of television coverage on attitudes to the war in Vietnam. Both Professor Hallin, in his book The Uncensored War: The Media and Vietnam, published in 1968, and the American historian Stanley Karnow in Vietnam, A History, published in 1997, have questioned the importance of this coverage. Karnow suggests that public opinion surveys at the time made it plain that the Tet Offensive hardly altered attitudes to the war and that public support for the war had been slipping for two years before the war because of increased casualties. Hallin concludes that television was probably more a follower than a leader in the nation’s change of course in Vietnam.

However, there can be little doubt that dramatic film showing the effects of chemical weapons, such as the naked girl running away from a napalm attack (shown above), had a dramatic impact on public opinion in America and attitudes to the war.

37
Q

What reasons led to US withdrawal of vietnam?

A

It seemed obvious, especially after the Tet Offensive, that the USA could not win in Vietnam. Indeed, in 1968 the ‘Wise Men’, a group of senior advisers, advocated a retreat.

Nixon was elected president on the promise of US withdrawal from Vietnam and was very aware of the strong protests against the war. Indeed, without these protests, which increased after the US extended the war to the bombing of Cambodia in 1970, Nixon may have conceivably continued the war.

By the end of the 1960s, the war was very unpopular. The media, including television, radio and the majority of newspapers, turned against the war alter the Tet Offensive, in 1968, by which time more than 36,000 members of the US military had been killed, and protests were being held in every major city.

US involvement in Vietnam was very expensive. In 1964, it had cost the US taxpayer less than half a billion dollars. By 1968, this cost had spiralled to $26.5 billion. The war was a main cause of the government’s budget deficit of $25 billion and rising inflation in 1968.

In May 1969, President Nixon, who had been elected the previous year on a promise of withdrawing US troops from Vietnam, unveiled his plan to end US involvement, known as Vietnamisation. The idea was that the South Vietnamese soldiers would be trained and equipped to take the place of US troops as they were gradually withdrawn. The strategy did not work because the South Vietnamese troops were no match for the Communist forces.

Peace talks to end the war had begun as early as 1968 but made no real progress until Nixon’s visit to China in 1972, after which the Chinese encouraged more cooperation from the government of North Vietnam. On 23 January 1973, a ceasefire was signed in Paris followed four days later by a formal peace treaty in which the USA promised to fully withdraw all its troops, and the Vietcong was allowed to hold on to all captured areas of South Vietnam. Within two years, the Communists had defeated the South Vietnamese armed forces and re-united Vietnam.

38
Q

What were the effects of the Vietnam war?

A

The USA spent around $30 billion each year on the war. This did much to undermine Johnson’s spending on the Great Society. The war also made Johnson very unpopular and heavily influenced his decision not to seek re-election as president in 1968.

The inability to win the war pushed Nixon into considering different diplomatic strategies that affected the Cold War. His decision to visit China to establish closer relations, and also to develop détente with the Soviet Union, were attempts to drive a wedge between the two main supporters of North Vietnam.

From the war emerged the Nixon Doctrine, which stated that the USA expected its allies to take care of their own military defence. The Vietnam War was the first war that the USA had lost and there was an unwillingness to become involved in future conflicts.

There was also a terrible human cost for the USA with 50,000 American deaths in Vietnam and a further 300,000 wounded.