2) Running Trends and Injuries 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Running trends

A
  • Barefoot running
  • Minimalist running
  • Forefoot running (pose method)
  • Maximalist shoes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Running shoe styles

A
  • Standard training shoes
  • “Lyte” training
  • Racing flats
  • Minimalist shoes
  • Newton shoe (Pose running method)
  • Most recently: Maximalist shoes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hoka shoes

A
  • Marketed as a “recovery shoe”
  • Very stable (wide)
  • VERY cushioned and “easy on the feet”
  • Rocker technology
  • No medical conclusions as of ye
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Barefoot fallacies

A
  • Injury rates have not decreased over the last 40 years so running shoes must be the problem (the running population is different now than in the 1970’s)
  • Anecdotal testimonials (injuries cured when shoes discarded)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consequences of cushioned running shoes

A
  • De-stabilizes gait
  • Do not significantly reduce impact forces
  • Inhibits proprioception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Negative effects of shoes

A
  • Promote heel strike
  • Reduce sensory feedback
  • Increased joint torsional forces
  • Decreased efficiency
  • Shoes allow runners to adopt a gait style that increases stride length and decreases cadence, thus increasing impact forces and joint torques
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Positive effects of shoes

A
  • Protection from hard man-made surfaces
  • Comfort
  • Enable a greater variety of people to run
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Shoe design: injury prevention

A
  • Most running injury research implicates excessive pronation and/or excessive impact forces as major causes
  • In recent years this has been challenged
  • Newer theories: “muscle tuning”, neuromuscular responses, muscle atrophy, “unnatural gait” and altered limb stiffness caused by footwear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Proposed injury mechanisms influenced by shoes

A
  • Altered muscle activation
  • Asynchronous joint coupling
  • Altered joint alignment
  • Increased impact forces
  • Inhibited proprioception
  • Improper or excessively worn footwear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gait in shoes

A
  • Higher impact forces
  • Longer stride length
  • Lower stride frequency
  • Decreased net efficiency
  • Energy return of shoes is exaggerated
  • Decreased proprioceptive feedback
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Barefoot gait

A
  • Lower impact forces
  • Shorter stride length
  • Higher stride frequency
  • Higher net efficiency
  • More efficient energy return of foot
  • Optimal proprioception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Barefoot vs. shoes research

A
  • Inncreased joint torques at hip, knee, ankle in shoes vs. barefoot
  • Increased rearfoot movement, total and rate of pronation in shoes vs. barefoot
  • Decreased awareness of impact and foot position awareness in shoes vs. barefoot
  • Decreased running efficiency in shoes vs. barefoot
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Barefoot running is more economical

A
  • VO 2 testing has shown increased economy and lower oxygen consumption over short (30 min) distances
  • Shoes produce a “mass effect” and material compression results in energy loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Minimalist shoes

A
  • Less cushioning
  • Less stability
  • Less weight
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Racing flats

A
  • The original “minimalist” shoe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Minimalist running benefits

A
  • Minimal cushioning allows for optimal plantar stimuli which elicit impact moderating strategies
  • Long-term benefits not known
  • Injury prevention ?
  • Improved performance ?
17
Q

Newton shoe

A
  • Natural (toe-strike) running

- Forefoot striker only

18
Q

Etiology of running injuries

A
  • Studies show that the average runner will sustain an average of one injury per year
  • Training errors (overuse, etc) are responsible for at least 50 % of all injuries
19
Q

Running injuries (% each)

A
  • Knee = 42.1 %
  • Foot / Ankle = 36.9 %
  • Lower leg = 12.8 %
  • Hip/Pelvis = 10.9 %
  • Calf/Achilles = 6.4 %
  • Upper leg = 5.2 %
  • Lower back = 3.4 %
20
Q

Modern footwear and injury vulnerability

A
  • Running-related injuries are less common in barefoot populations
  • Evidence of diminished impact moderating behavior with modern footwear compared with barefoot running
21
Q

Risks of running barefoot

A
  • Skin injuries
  • Punctures
  • Abrasions
  • Blisters
  • Thermal injuries
  • Vasospasticdisorders
  • Musculoskeletal injuries
  • Achilles, calf
  • Metatarsals, fascia
22
Q

Achilles / calf strain

A
  • Pre-activation of the gastrocsoleus complex occurs earlier in barefoot running than with shoes
  • Increased eccentric loading
23
Q

Achilles tendonopathy

A
  • Eccentric exercise
  • Stretching
  • PRP ? Very little evidence to support usage
  • ESWT
24
Q

Metatarsalgia

A
  • Increased forefoot loading during contact phase of gait (toe-strike)
  • Stress fracture also possible
25
Q

Plantar fasciitis

A
  • Due to increased flexibility of shank

- Decreased midfoot stability

26
Q

Barefoot / minimalist running recommendations

A
  • Experienced runner
  • Best as part of a training program (5 – 10 % of total weekly mileage)
  • Grass is best. Avoid concrete and asphalt
  • Introduce slowly and keep mileage low
  • Some initial discomfort may be expected
  • Begin minimalist and progress to barefoot (if desired)