2.1 ETHICAL RELATIVISM Flashcards
(15 cards)
Also known as moral relativism, this ethical doctrine claims that there are no universal or absolute moral principles
ethical relativism
Standards of right and wrong are always relative to a particular culture or society. The moral opinion of one individual is as good as any other because there is no objective basis for saying that a particular action is right or wrong apart from a specific social group.
ethical relativism
Every culture has its own norm of moral actions. Some societies that consider several kinds of actions or practices as right may be considered wrong by other societies
Strengths of ethical relativism
Ethical relativism contradicts common beliefs and ordinary experiences in several ways.
Criticisms and objections
Healthcare professionals usually face issues that arise when scientific medical procedures clash with the religious aspect of ethical relativism.
In the medical context
it is advocated by Joseph Fletcher, an American Protestant medical doctor and the author of Situation Ethics: The New Morality (1966).
Situation ethics
it is the Fletcher’s preferred approach to the problem of morality. This ethical theory states that the moral norm depends upon a given situation, but whatever this situation may be, one must always act in the name of Christian love.
situationism
For Fletcher, the following six propositions are the fundamentals of Christian conscience
six proposition
Love alone is good per se, the only thing, by its very nature, that is good. Thus, one who acts, decides, and judges by agapeic love
Proposition I: Only one thing is intrinsically good, namely, love, nothing else
Christians, to deserve their calling, should base their moral judgments on agapeic love.
Proposition II: The ultimate norm of Christian decisions is love, nothing else.
Love and justice go together.
Proposition III: Love and justice are the same, for justice is love distributed
One may like or dislike a person because of the qualities and traits that he/she possesses.
Proposition IV: Love wills the neighbor’s good whether we like him/her or not.
Christian ethics teaches that “the end does not justify the means.” No matter how good or beneficial the end may be, one may not employ evil means to attain it.
Proposition V: Only the end justifies the means, nothing else.
This sums up what situational Christian ethics is all about.
Proposition VI: Decisions ought to be made situationally, not prescriptively.