2.1 individualtistic crime theories Flashcards
(8 cards)
Freud’s psychoanalysis
psyche determinism, ID, EGO, SUPEREGO,
disorted superego=crim behaviour
psychoanalysis- transferance analysis, free association
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis
Maternal deprivation hypothesis, critial period/ law of accumalated seperation, affectionless psychopathy, 44 theives
S- empircal evidence, emphasis on social care
W- reinforces gender rigid sterotipes, rutter 1956 privation
Eyesencks personality theory
Personally split into 2 dimensions, E VS I
emotion split into 2, N VS E.S
used 1000 questionares
Criminals= high E and N
developed due to conditioning and genetic inheritance
later assess psychotism= crim= high
S- application, questionsres
W- questionares, s.s, reductionist
Sutherlands differential association theory
argued indv learn crim behaviour in family/peer groups due to 2 factors:
Imitation- criminal status by observing techniques e.g
Learned attitudes- socialisation with group exposes them to attitudes
S- farrington 1995, 411 men in london 45% crim, 1 of 7 traits in family
W- farrington said education+ poverty play factor, issues with morality, nurture
Operant conditioning
skinner box, behaviourism, jeffreys differentential association theory,
S- practical application, study evidence
w- environmental determisnm, anthropormphic
Social learning theory
mix behaviourism-+ cognitive
mediational processes A,R, MR, M
bandura 1961 et al
Bandura and walters 1963
S- lab experiments, cultural variations
W- lab evidence, environmental reductionsit, socially sensitive
Criminal personality theory
cognition
yochleson and samenow 1976 applied to criminality
240 male offenders addmited to psychiatric hopstisls
interviews+ longitudinal 14 year study to see thinkfing patterns
need for power- limbic system deceision making- prefrontal cortex
S- practical application CBT, case study
W- unrepresentative ( androcentric), no control group
Moral development
morality develops in stages,
pre conventional stage
adult stage
crim= less mature stage
S-explanatory power, thornton and reid applied to theft but not violence, interventions
w- people can thinking whulst commiting crime