2.4 how it interacts with the executive Flashcards
\the role and significance of backbenchers in both houses
How are backbenchers protected?
- by parliamentary privilege
- mentioned in the Bill of Rights 1689
- backbenchers are free to raise questions without being prosecuted
the role and significance of backbenchers in both houses
what are backbencher’s roles?
- represent their constituents
- scrutinise their government
- consider legislation
- legitimise government decisions. Eg. commit troops to military action
- raise issues they regard as significant
the role and significance of backbenchers in both houses
what determines a backbenchers influence?
Blair example Iraq + terrorist
- majority of the government
- Eg. Tony Blair meant he could survive large rebellions. In 2003, 84 labour MPs voted against involvement in the Iraq war but Blair still won the vote
- Eg. in 2005 when his vote dipped to 66.
- he failed to introduce a 90 day detention for terrorist suspects as 49 labour MPs rebelled.
the role and significance of backbenchers in both houses
When are backbenchers very influential?
- when the government has a small majority
- Eg. 2017 When May lost her majority, she had to ‘manage’ rather than ‘lead’ Brexit to create crossparty support for her strategy,
- It was only when Johnson won an 80 seat HoC majority in 2019 that he was able to enact the EU withdrawal agreement he wanted
Scrutiny - select committees
what are their jobs? examples?
- to monintor the departemtns of state
- buisiness, energy and industrial strategy
- digital culture, media, sport
- defence
- education
- environment, food, and rural affairs
- foreign affairs
- etc.
select committees
how can they cut across departmental lines? significant examples?
- Public Accounts Committees
- women and equalities committee
- committee on the future relationship with the European Union
select committees
How do their reports carry great weight? how are the members selected? how are chairs of select committees an attractive role?
- they are non-partisan
- each political party votes on the members
- the chairs are elected by MPs as a whole
- the chairs are an attractive role because they recieve a significant financial bonus, and they have cross-party support and strong mandate from the legislature.
select committees
Eg. 2020 Jeremy Hunt and the Health Select Committee: how was he effective? what did the significant 2021 report on covid 19 show? how was it also positive?
- as previous health secretary he could criticise them effectively
- 2021 health and social care comittee + science and technology committee reported that the government had a slow response to the covid pandemic, but also how the vaccination programme had been successful.
select committees
2020 Tobias Ellwood and the Defence Select Committee: how was he experienced? what was their significant report in 2021
- Tobias Ellwood was selected as the chair for the Defence Select Committee and was previously a soldier and defence minister
- 2021: their report on the most effective way fo dealing with russia was ‘it is imperative the UK govenrment work with Ukraine allies, and NATO to promote peaceful resolutions between Russia and Ukraine’
select committees
example of the Public Accounts Committee being significant during covid
2021 report
- it reported on how effectively the government has spent taxpayers money
- Eg. 2021 report on the £22b cost of ‘track and trace’ was critical of the government
select committees
advantages of select committees: how are they legitmised? what are their powers? how do they have a significant impact on government decision making?
- due to parliamentary privilege, MPs can ask difficult questions without fear of prosecution
- they can consult widely with ministers, civil servants, and experts, and can send for ‘persons, papers, and records’ to help investigate
- they are also non-partisan and can summon expert witnesses
select committees
2015 Health Select Committee example of impact
- they proposed a 20% tax on sugary drinks to cut obesity
- 2016 George Osborne introduced a sugar drink tax
select committees
disadvantages of select committees: are they really that effective? do they take away time from MPs priorities?
- MPs are not trained in forensic cross-examination
- due to the time demand on MPs, select committees significantly disadvantage their ability to scrutinise the government
Ministerial questions
how/wehn are ministerial questions asked in both houses
- monday-thursday an hour of HoC time is set aside for ministerial questions
- in the HoL this is half an hour and qustions are directed at the government generally rather than specific departments
Ministerial questions
when do ministers have to respond to questions? what does the ministerial code of conduct require? example?
- ministers have to respond to questions within a week in the commons, and within 2 weeks in the lords
- the ministerial code of conduct requires the qustions be made public
- Eg. during the early stages of Russia-Ukraine, the foreign office had several questions from MPs over the UKs response
Prime Ministers Questions
how/when are PMQs asked? how many can each group ask?
- wednesday 12-12:30
- the PM is expected to be in the chamber to answer questions
- the PM can be held accountable this way
- leader of the opposition can ask 6 questions
- leader of the next biggest party can ask 2 questions
- then the other MPs can ask questions
Prime Ministers Questions
governing party’s MPs?
- can ask questions to allow the PM to take credit for government’s successes
Prime Ministers Questions
advantages?
- PMQs allow for parliament to interrogate the PM in a way that cannot happen in the USA where the executive is much less regularly accountable
- PMQs also allow the PM to expose the opposition
Prime Ministers Questions
disadvantages?
Gerlad Kaufman MP quote
- performative and disruptive, not debate
- questions are never truly answered, just countered by something else
- 2015 Sir Gerald Kaufman MP said PMQs have become an ‘exchange of pointless and useless declamations
Prime Ministers Questions
relavance and importance of PMQs example: 2022 Boris Johnson
- Keir starmer used PMQs to examine Boris’ culpability for illegal lockdown parties at DOwning Street, and the government’s response to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine
- the PM had to respond to enormous issues of public concern
Liason Committee
what is it? how does it perform?
- represents chairs of all select committees and twice yearly questiosn the PM
- less confrontational than PMQs
- ## extended discussion of issues
Liason Committee
2019 chair Sarah Wollastone rebuke on Johnson
‘our role as select committee chairs is to ask you detailed questions on behalf of the public and we planned to do so on Brexit, climate change, health and social care. It is unacceptable that you are refusing to be held to account’
Liason Committee
2020 government appointed who as the chair? instead of what?
- Sir Bernard Jenkin
- instead of allowing the select committees to choose the chair which had been done since 2010
Liason Committee
Eg. 2022 Jenkin and climate strategy
- he made it clear to the PM it was unacceptable to not be clear about his climate strategy