3.3 The Prime Minister and the Cabinet Flashcards
(46 cards)
the functions of the cabinet
how often do they meet?
- once a week for no mor than 2 hours thursday mornings
- can be summoned in a crisis
the functions of the cabinet
cabinets important roles
AP, DKI, DB, COA, C.
- approve decisions
- determine key issues of policy
- decide how the government will determine buisiness
- final court of appeal for disputes between departments
- PMs appoint cabient committees to develop/implement policy
the functions of the cabinet
approve decisions: which ones? what does this maintain? what does the cabinet provide?
- decisions made elsewhere
- maintains unity of government
- provides the key forum in which government policies are legitimised
the functions of the cabinet
determining key issues of policy
callaghan and may examples
- 1976 Callaghan allowed the cabinet to debate whether to accept IMF.
- Eg. 2018 May summoned the cabinet to Chequers to determine the governments position in Brexit negotiations
the functions of the cabinet
deciding how the government will determine buisiness: how is this organised?
- controversial legislation
- ministers will need to know when they should be on the front benches to support it.
- chief whip also explains whether there is likely to be a sufficient government majority, debating any possible concessions
the functions of the cabinet
final court of appeal for departmental disputes
- the cabient may resolve an important issue between 2 departments
- Eg. during the 2010-2015 coalition
the functions of the cabinet
PMs appointing cabient committees to develop/implement policy. What does the PM decide? what legitimacy do these have? How do they choose the chair of these committees?
Eg. Johnson
- PM decides members, how many, and the remit of the committees
- decisions hold the same legitimacy as the full cabinet
- PM will chair committees that are important to the government
- Eg. Boris Johnson chaired the covid 19 strategy committee
How is the cabinet selected?
how does the PM choose who sits in the cabinet? how is this not always th ecase?
- the PM chooses
- but ultimately, there are some high profile figures who’s exclusion would be politcally impossible, and others who would never aspire to be in the cabinet.
the functions of the cabinet
Eg. Political experience
1997 and expectations of who will be in the cabinet
- Tony Blair was expected to appoint Gordon Brown as chancellor, given his economic experience.
How is the cabinet selected?
who will the PM also advance senior positions to? examples? (Blair, May)
- allies they can rely on
- Eg. Blair advanced Alan Johnson (education) and Alan Milburn (health) with their reforming attitudes
- Eg. May sacked George Osborne as chancellor to make her administration appear less elitist.
How is the cabinet selected?
Who does the PM also (unexpectedly) include in the cabinet? why? examples?
- enemies
- it binds them to the principle of collective ministerial responsibility
- Eg. 2016-2018, May tolerated Johnson because she thought she was safer with him inside the government
How is the cabinet selected?
What does the PM also often do? (balance)
Eg. Blair and Prescott
- balances their cabinet to avoid alienating factions
- Eg. Blair included John Prescott as deputy PM from the working class left of the labour party, who had a career in the merchany Navy. Blair showed New Labour hadn’t entirely abandoned socialist ideals.
How is the cabinet selected?
Eg. Mays cabinet.. Remain vs Leave
- balanced
- Phillip Hammond - chancellor of the exchequer (remain)
- Amber Rudd - home secretary (remain)
- Boris Johnson - foreign secretary (leave)
- David Davis - brexit secretary (leave)
especially important since the conservatives were so divided, she had to give prominent positions to both Remain and Leave politicians.
How is the cabinet selected?
PMs right to appoint during a coalition… example
- Eg. Cameron in 2010 had to appoint Nick Clegg as deputy PM and give lib dems 5/22 of the seats in cabinet
How is the cabinet selected?
Eg. Johnson (in contrast to previous example) political domiance in cabinet?
- huge majority
- initially only needed to appoint cabinet members who shared his ideology, since there was no divisions
How significant is the cabinet?
PMs position in cabinet
- in theory the first among equals.
How significant is the cabinet?
large size of the cabinet could…
- prevent constructive debate.
- lends the idea that cabinet is simply to approve pre-determined policies.
How significant is the cabinet?
Since Wilsons government, how has the role of cabinet been questioned?
- PMs are treated presidentially
- PMs acquire info from other sources, they already have an idea of policy direction
How significant is the cabinet?
which development has enhanced the government?
- private office.
How significant is the cabinet?
Which position did Blair introduce?
- Prime ministers chief of staff - cordinated policy. Eg. Jonathon Powell under Blair, this has been retained.
- Prime ministers strategy unit
- Prime ministers delivery unit
latter two set department targets and monitored performance
(cameron abolished roles but blair still strengthened implementation unit)
How significant is the cabinet?
Alaistar Campbell
- grew the Press Office
- meant they had more control over news stories presentation
How significant is the cabinet?
Blair increasingly relied on who rather than the civil service? why? examples?
- SPADS rather than civil servants
- politically appointed. This means they are committed to the same ideology as the PM
- Eg. Dominic Cummings has played a highly partisan role as Johnsons adviser 2019-2020 in determining policy priorities
How significant is the cabinet?
What did Johnson do to prompt Sajid Javids resignation in 2020?
- demanded cabinet members political advisers be approved by No.10
- cabinet office was also grown to supervise the work of each department
How significant is the cabinet?
However, how are they influential?
-
- they are still the most influential members of each party
- memebrs are likely to be ambitious, and those heading powerful departmetns have been compared to feudal barons with the authority to challenge the PM