3. Sesame Street and Educational Television Flashcards

1
Q

sesame street study question?

A

Are the benefits of Sesame Street seen across cultures, across socioeconomic diversity?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what method did they use?

A

meta-analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

advantage of meta-analysis

A

examine previous studies, analyze for common patterns and overall finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did they examine and analyze

A
  • Cognitive outcomes
  • Learning about the world
  • Social reasoning and attitudes

Analyzed overall effect size (d) across studies → estimate of the magnitude of relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

findings?

A
  • Positive effects!
    • Those who watched more Sesame Street performed better than those who watched less
  • Seen cross variations in country income and sample SES!
    • Consistent effect!! On both academic and social outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

where were these effects strongest?

A

3-5yr olds (similar to early childhood education interventions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

LIMITATIONS and PROBLEMS

A
  • Gathered all data sets on the possible effects of Sesame Street outside of the US (18 internal reports + 3 additional studies)
  • Biased?
  • cherry picked ?
  • Is there pressure to find positive results for the ones who are providing the data?
  • file drawer effect?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what outcomes were effects organized into

A
  1. Cognitive outcomes
    • Knowledge of letters, shapes, colours, relationships of size & distance
  2. Learning about the world
    • Physical and social environment, health/hygiene, national/local cultures
  3. Social reasoning and attitudes
    • Moral reasoning and attitudes towards out-groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did ALÁDE & NATHANSON (2016) ask?

A

How do features of the viewer impact learning from educational TV?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

examined….?

A
  • Prior knowledge: with program/characters, with educational content
  • Interest: in program, in educational content
  • Verbal ability
  • Short-term memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

tested on…?

A

3-6 year-olds
- First tested for viewer characteristics → verbal ability, working memory, interest, prior knowledge
- Watched TV episode
- Tested comprehension of both narrative and educational content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

FINDINGS

A
  • Those with better verbal ability, short-term memory, and prior knowledge all related to better comprehension
  • Interest not related
  • Comprehension of narrative content mediated comprehension of educational content
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what can enhance comprehension of narrative

A

when ethnic and social class background matches characters and situations in program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

limitations

A
  • not economically diverse
  • measures specifically developed, validity and reliability is uncertain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

not an important predictor?

A

interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly