3. stabilizing, directional, and disruptive selection Flashcards
(22 cards)
natural selection doesn’t look at genotype it looks at …
phenotypes it looks at weather it is brown, green, long, short
define evolutionary fitness
measure of how many offspring an individual has compared to others in that generation
genotypes =
track evolutionary changes
high fitness =
more offspring in the next generation
define quantitative traits
show continuous variation (bell curve) describe it in numbers that can be counted (DISRUPTIVE SELECTION)
define qualitative traits
influenced by 1 or few alleles example being brown vs yellow, short vs long
there are #__ main categories for how natural selection can operate on ______ _____ name them:
3
quantitative traits
directional, disruptive, and stabilizing
describe stabalzing selection
average phenotype (stablize around center/mean)
define directional selection
favor individuals at 1 end of the bell curve over evolutionary time the population will move in 1 direction
define disruptive selection
favor individuals at both ectrenme ends so fewer at the center/middle l
weight ex; individuals with mean weight (intermediate weight) for stablaicing selection would be?
more fit so more offspring than the one that are very small or very large
weight ex: for directional selection the _______ fitness is at #__ extreme end of the population so over evolutionary time ….
highest
1
shift to 1 side
disruptive selection means?
both extremes are more extreme than the middle
define frequency dependent selection
the more common the trait is the less fitness that trait give (side mouth fish example)
evolutionary is constrained by ___________ in cell size (too big)
SA- to - V ratio
organism size I contained by ______
SA - to - V ratio
protein folding constrained by?
types of bonds such as covalent, ionic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bonds
low of theordynaic contained by
energy transfers
in order for a trait to evolve a allele for that trait has to be?
exist
what constrains evolution
history and trade offs
define trade offs
any adaptation/allel both befits and costs
in order to evolve the benefits of a traits have to?
outweight the costs so the trade off between benefits and costs has to be IN FAVOR of the benefits or else that traits will not evolve