3.1.3 Forensics - Psychological explanations Flashcards
(52 cards)
x
Who proposed the theory of the criminal personality?
Eysenck
Describe someone with a criminal personality
- Someone who scores high on measures of extroversion, neuroticism and psychoticism
- Cannot easily be conditioned
- Cold and unfeeling
- Likely to engage in offending behaviour
What did Eysenck argue about all personality types?
- All personality types have a biological basis and come form a nervous system an individual inherits
What three dimensions can behaviour be represented by?
Extroversion - Introversion
Neuroticism - Stable
Psychoticism - Sociable
What is extroversion?
- Outgoing people who enjoy risk and danger due to their nervous systems being under aroused
- Constantly seeking excitement which raises their cortical arousal
- Not easily conditioned and don’t learn from their mistakes
What is neuroticism?
- The degree a person experiences negative emotional states and sees the world as threatening and unsafe
- Respond negatively to stressors and are self conscious and shy
- High reactivity in the nervous system (respond quickly to situations of threat)
- Nervous, jumpy - behaviour is difficult to predict an dare emotionally charged in situations
What is psychoticism?
- Aggressive, antisocial person who lacks empathy, egocentric and insensitive
- Have high levels of testosterone
Aspects of the criminal personality
- Creates an individual who is cold, unemotional, difficult to predict and likely to engage in risk taking behaviours
- Neurotics: unstable + overreact to situations of threat // emotionally charged, may commit crime in response o emotional situation
- Extraverts: sensation seekers, engage in dangerous activities, thrill of committing a crime = likely to be an offender
Psychotics: aggressive, lack empathy and a conscience
Eysenck’s criminal personality - socialisation
- Offending behaviour: developmentally immature that’s selfish and concerned with immediate gratification (impatient)
- Cannot be easily conditioned in society due to difficult nervous systems
- Less likely to learn anxiety responses to anti-social impulses and therefore act antisocial
- Less likely to learn following punishment
How can the criminal personality be measured?
- EPQ
- 100 items
Eysenck’s criminal personality AO3
- Research support (2422 vs control group)
- Additional dimensions to be considered
- Biologically deterministic
What is moral reasoning?
- The process by which an individual draws upon their ow value system to determine whether an action is right or wrong
- Kolberg objectified this by identifying different levels of reasoning based on people’s answers to moral dilemmas e.g. Heinz Dilemma
What are the levels of moral reasoning?
The way a person thinks about right and wrong
- Such thinking can apply to moral behaviour
- The higher the level, the more that behaviour is driven by a sense of what is right and the less it is driven by avoiding punishment
What did Kolberg suggest about moral development?
Stage theory suggests that as someone matures, their moral reasoning becomes more sophisticated - the higher the stage, the higher their moral reasoning
How are the levels of criminality linked to criminality?
- Some individuals don’t proceed past certain stages of morality, making them more likely to offend
- Crime is committed as the offender is thinking how the situation impacts them and not society
Which level of moral reasoning are offenders most likely to be classified in?
- Pre-conventional level
- Characterised by a need to avoid punishment and gain rewards, associated with childlike reasoning
- Supported by studies suggesting offenders are more egocentric and display poorer social perspective-taking skills
- Higher levels: sympathise with the rights of others and exhibit more conventional behaviour e.g. honesty ad non-violence
Moral reasoning AO3
- Depends on the type of offence (financial gain = pre-conventional level)
- Useful - provides insights into the mechanisms of the criminal mind
- Gender biased - based on data from boys only
What are cognitive distortions?
- Faulty, biased and irrational ways of thinking that individuals perceive themselves, other people and the world inaccurately and negatively
- They are errors in people’s information processing systems
- Linked to the way criminals interpret the behaviour of others and justify their own actions
What is hostile attribution bias?
- The tendency to judge ambiguous situations or the actions of others as aggressive or threatening when they may not be
- Offenders may misread non-aggressive cues which may trigger a disproportionate, violent response
Hostile Attribution Bias: research support - Justye
- presented 55 violent offenders with images of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions
- Violent offenders were more likely to perceive images as angry than a matched control group
Where do psychologists believe the roots of hostile attribution bias lies in?
- Roots may lie in childhood
- Research: showed children a video clip of an ambiguous provocation, intention was neither hostile/aggressive
- Children who were identified as more aggressive before the study interpreted the situation as more hostile compared to those who were seen as non-aggressive
What is minimalisation?
- Type of deception that involves downplaying the significance of an event/emotion (common strategy with dealing with guilt)
- E.g. burglars describe themselves as doing a job to minimise the seriousness of their offences
Minimalisation: research support - Barbaree
- Individuals who commit sexual offences are prone to minimalisation
- Barbaree: among 26 rapists, 54% denied they committed an offence at all, 40% minimised the harm they caused to the victim
Minimalisation: correlation
- Psychologists found that when measuring cognitive distortions in anti-social young adults, there was a strong relationship between the level of anti-social behaviour and minimalisation
- Indicates offenders use minimalisation with negative behaviours