3.5: Virtual relationships in social media Flashcards

1
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks)

A

The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore

A

Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this,

A

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
Why is this?

A

This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.

A

Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

A

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
Why is this?

A

This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002)

A

Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However,

A

However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.

A

Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.

A

Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

First AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
Example

A

For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
Why does this support the hyperpersonal model?

A

This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

Second AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.

A

This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages

17
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this,

A

As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships

18
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore,

A

Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships

19
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships.

Third AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the absence of gating explanation is that there is research support for it

20
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the absence of gating explanation is that there is research support for it.
Example

A

For example, McKenna and Bargh (2000) looked at computer mediated communication use by lonely and socially anxious people and found that they were able to express themselves and their ‘true selves’ more than in face to face relationships.
Of the romantic relationships initially formed online, 70% survived more than 2 years

21
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the absence of gating explanation is that there is research support for it.
For example, McKenna and Bargh (2000) looked at computer mediated communication use by lonely and socially anxious people and found that they were able to express themselves and their ‘true selves’ more than in face to face relationships.
Of the romantic relationships initially formed online, 70% survived more than 2 years.
What does this suggest?

A

This suggests that the absence of gating explanation is valid, because this is a higher proportion than for relationships formed in the offline world

22
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the absence of gating explanation is that there is research support for it.
For example, McKenna and Bargh (2000) looked at computer mediated communication use by lonely and socially anxious people and found that they were able to express themselves and their ‘true selves’ more than in face to face relationships.
Of the romantic relationships initially formed online, 70% survived more than 2 years.
This suggests that the absence of gating explanation is valid, because this is a higher proportion than for relationships formed in the offline world.

Fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, relationships are multi modal

23
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the absence of gating explanation is that there is research support for it.
For example, McKenna and Bargh (2000) looked at computer mediated communication use by lonely and socially anxious people and found that they were able to express themselves and their ‘true selves’ more than in face to face relationships.
Of the romantic relationships initially formed online, 70% survived more than 2 years.
This suggests that the absence of gating explanation is valid, because this is a higher proportion than for relationships formed in the offline world.

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, relationships are multi modal.

A

This is explored further by Walther (2011), who argues that any theory seeking to explain computer mediated communication relationships, including the role of self-disclosure, needs to accommodate the fact that our relationships are generally conducted both online and offline through many different media, such as social media

24
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the absence of gating explanation is that there is research support for it.
For example, McKenna and Bargh (2000) looked at computer mediated communication use by lonely and socially anxious people and found that they were able to express themselves and their ‘true selves’ more than in face to face relationships.
Of the romantic relationships initially formed online, 70% survived more than 2 years.
This suggests that the absence of gating explanation is valid, because this is a higher proportion than for relationships formed in the offline world.

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, relationships are multi modal.
This is explored further by Walther (2011), who argues that any theory seeking to explain computer mediated communication relationships, including the role of self-disclosure, needs to accommodate the fact that our relationships are generally conducted both online and offline through many different media, such as social media.

A

This is in fact a central characteristic of many modern relationships, so it is not a case of ‘either/or’

25
Q

Discuss what psychological research has told us about virtual relationships in social media (16 marks).
The reduced cues theory is that according to Sproull and Kiesler (1986), computer-mediated communication relationships are less effective than face to face ones, because they lack many of the cues we normally depend on in face to face interactions, for example tone of voice and facial expressions.
Virtual relationships are therefore more likely to involve blunt and even aggressive communication, which ultimately leads to a reluctance to self-disclose, to the negative effects of deindividuation and disinhibition.

Despite this, the hyperpersonal model (Walther) argues that online relationships can be more personal and involve greater self-disclosure than face to face ones.
This is because of the effects of anonymity, which include feelings of closeness and intimacy and less emphasis on physical characteristics.
Walther also argues that one’s online persona can be heavily manipulated and controlled and this selective self-presentation can be hyper-honest or hyper-dishonest.

The absence of gating is that factors that normally act as a barrier to interaction, such as being in a different age group or being from a different social background, are removed, so relationships are more likely to develop, as self-disclosure is more frequent and deeper.
This is because people’s attention is refocused on self-disclosure and away from superficial and distracting features.
Bargh (2002) also found that virtual relationships develop quicker because intimacy occurs sooner than in real life relationships.
However, they also end quicker, because the high excitement level of the interaction isn’t matched by the level of trust between the relationship partners.
Cooper and Sportolari (1997) called this the boom and bust phenomenon of online relationships.
Virtual relationships overall widen the range of potential social relationships.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the hyperpersonal model is that there is research support for people self-disclosing in online relationships in ways that are sometimes ‘hyperhonest’ or hyperdishonest.’
For example, Whitty and Joinson found when researching a number of online discussions that the questions tended to be very direct, probing and sometimes intimate, whereas face to face conversations tend to be ‘small talk.’
People also had no issue in answering the personal questions online and were direct and to the point.
This supports the hyperpersonal model, because it suggests that the way we self-disclose in online relationships is designed to present ourselves in an exaggeratedly positive light, which aids relationship formation.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one limitation of the reduced cues theory is that it suggests cues are absent when they are in fact just different.
This is supported by Walther and Tidwell, who argue that people online use other cues, such as the style and timing of messages.
As well as this, acrostics, emotions and emojis are used as effective substitutes for facial expressions and tone of voice in face to face relationships.
Therefore, the success of online relationships is difficult for the reduced cues theory to explain, because it shows that online relationships can be just as personal as those conducted face to face and that it’s possible to express emotional states in virtual relationships.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that one strength of the absence of gating explanation is that there is research support for it.
For example, McKenna and Bargh (2000) looked at computer mediated communication use by lonely and socially anxious people and found that they were able to express themselves and their ‘true selves’ more than in face to face relationships.
Of the romantic relationships initially formed online, 70% survived more than 2 years.
This suggests that the absence of gating explanation is valid, because this is a higher proportion than for relationships formed in the offline world.

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, relationships are multi modal.
This is explored further by Walther (2011), who argues that any theory seeking to explain computer mediated communication relationships, including the role of self-disclosure, needs to accommodate the fact that our relationships are generally conducted both online and offline through many different media, such as social media.
This is in fact a central characteristic of many modern relationships, so it is not a case of ‘either/or.’

A

What we choose to disclose in our online relationships will inevitably be influenced by our offline interactions and vice versa