355 exam 1 Flashcards

(68 cards)

1
Q

water resource management goals

A

protecting healthy waters
restoring degraded waters
enhancing socio-economic benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

monitoring waters

A

PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL ATTRIBUTES INCLUDE WATER TEMPERATURE AND CLARITY,
DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND A VARIETY OF CHEMICAL POLLUTANTS (PESTICIDES,
PHARMACEUTICALS, PLASTICS, ETC.)
* BIOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES INCLUDE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF INSECTS, FISH, ETC.
AS WELL AS SPECIES OF CONCERN (FRESHWATER MUSSELS, CORALS, MARINE
MAMMALS, ETC.).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

key point for water monitoring

A

ASSESSMENT REQUIRES AN OBJECTIVE (USUALLY NUMERIC)
BASIS FOR DISTINGUISHING HEALTHY WATERS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

clean water act

A

REQUIRES THAT STATES DEFINE ‘DESIGNATED USES’ FOR
EACH WATERBODY (E.G., ‘SWIMABLE’, ‘FISHABLE’, DRINKING
WATER, SUITABLE FOR AQUATIC LIFE).
* REQUIRES STATES TO ESTABLISH WATER QUALITY
STANDARDS TO PROTECT DESIGNATED USES.
* REQUIRES STATES TO MONITOR WATERS TO IDENTIFY
THOSE WHICH ARE NOT MEETING THEIR DESIGNATED USES
(AND REPORT TO EPA).
* REQUIRES STATES TO IMPLEMENT MEASURES TO MITIGATE
IMPAIRMENTS (I.E., TO ATTAIN WATER QUALITY STANDARDS).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CAUSES OF IMPAIRMENT IN VA
WATERS

A

BACTERIA LEVELS EXCEEDING
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
WAS THE MOST COMMON
CAUSE FOR IMPAIRMENT
(AFFECTING RECREATIONAL
USAGE AND SHELLFISH
HARVESTING).
* LOW DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND
LOW PH WERE COMMON
WATER QUALITY ISSUES AS
WELL AS PRESENCE OF HG
AND PCB IN FISH TISSUES
(LEADING TO CONSUMPTION
ADVISORIES).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

water quality standards

A

WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ARE DESIGNED TO PROTECT
DESIGNATED USES.
* IF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ARE NOT MET, THE SYSTEM IS
CONSIDERED IMPAIRED (NOT IN ATTAINMENT OF DESIGNATED USES).
* IDEALLY, THESE SHOULD BE QUANTITATIVE (NUMERIC).
* E.G.,DISSOLVED OXYGEN > 5 MG/L
* NOT: “DISSOLVED OXYGEN SHOULD NOT FALL BELOW LEVELS THAT
CAUSE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS”.
* STANDARDS HAVE TWO COMPONENTS:
* CRITERIA: USUALLY A THRESHOLD VALUE
* APPLICATION: HOW THE CRITERIA ARE ASSESSED (E.G., 30-DAY AVERAGE,
DAILY MAXIMUM, ETC.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

water quality standards pt2

A

DESIGNED TO PROTECT AGAINST DIRECT HARMFUL EFFECTS (E.G.,
TOXICITY) AS WELL AS INDIRECT EFFECTS (SECONDARY EFFECTS
ON WATER QUALITY).
* EXAMPLES:
* DIRECT: DISCHARGE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES SUCH AS HG.
* INDIRECT: DISCHARGE OF NUTRIENTS WHICH CAUSE ALGAL BLOOMS
THAT LEAD TO LOW OXYGEN.
* WATER QUALITY STANDARDS MUST BE SCIENTIFICALLY
DEFENSIBLE. IF A MUNICIPALITY OR INDUSTRY IS COMPELLED TO
SPEND MONEY TO ATTAIN A PARTICULAR STANDARD, THERE MUST
BE A MEASUREABLE BENEFIT TO HUMAN OR ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CHALLENGES TO SETTING WQ
STANDARDS

A

POLLUTANTS ARE COMPLEX
* LETHAL, SUB-LETHAL & INTERACTIVE EFFECTS
* HUMANS ARE COMPLEX SYSTEMS
* MULTIPLE TISSUE TYPES AND ORGAN SYSTEMS
* SENSITIVITY VARIES WITH SEX AND LIFE STAGE
* ECOSYSTEMS ARE COMPLEX
* MANY SPECIES WITH VARYING SENSITIVITY AND VARYING
EXPOSURE
* ETHICS
* TESTING ON HUMANS AND ANIMALS
* DOES “SAFE” = NO EFFECT?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CLEAN WATER ACT – PERMITTED POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE

A

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANT FROM A POINT SOURCE
INTO WATERS OF THE U.S WITHOUT A PERMIT IS
PROHIBITED.
* ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT REQUIRES PERMIT HOLDER TO
(A) MONITOR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS IN
OUTFALL, AND (B) USE BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY
TO MINIMIZING POLLUTANT DISCHARGE.
* THE PERMITTED AMOUNT OF POLLUTANT RELEASE IS
BASED ON A TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL).
* NOT SIMPLY – WHAT IS THE ALLOWABLE AMOUNT
RELEASED FROM THIS SOURCE,
* BUT, WHAT IS THE ALLOWABLE AMOUNT, GIVEN ALL
PERMIT HOLDERS FOR THIS WATERBODY.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

permittent pollution discharge

A

DETERMINATION OF THE ALLOWABLE LEVELS OF POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT:
a) ALL SOURCES OF THE POLLUTANT CONTRIBUTING TO THE
RECEIVING SYSTEM (INCLUDING POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCES).
b) THE CAPACITY OF THE SYSTEM TO DILUTE OR ASSIMILATE THE
POLLUTANT
c) THE TOXICITY OF THE POLLUTANT. THIS IS DETERMINED FROM
TOXICITY TESTING: EXPOSING TEST ORGANISMS TO POLLUTANTS
THAT ARE BEING RELEASED INTO THE ENVIRONMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WATERSHED:

A

A watershed is an area of land
where precipitation collects and
drains off into a common outlet, such
as into a stream.
Surficial topography can be used to
determine direction of flow and
thereby delineate watershed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RUNOFF:

A

PORTION OF RAINFALL
THAT FLOWS FROM LAND TO
WATER VIA SURFACE
(OVERLAND) OR SUB-SURFACE
(GROUNDWATER) FLOW.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

WATER MOVING ACROSS THE
LANDSCAPE

A

THE FORCE OF GRAVITY
ACTS TO MOVE WATER
FROM A POSITION OF
HIGHER ELEVATION TO
LOWER ELEVATION.
* THEREFORE, THE
ELEVATION OF WATER IN
THE LANDSCAPE (E.G.,
SURFACE HEIGHT OF A
STREAM OR
GROUNDWATER) CAN BE
USED TO PREDICT ITS
DIRECTION OF FLOW.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WATERSHEDS AS UNITS OF THE
LANDSCAPE

A

DRAINAGE BASINS CONNECT WITH
OTHER DRAINAGE BASINS IN A
NESTED PATTERN, WHICH IN TURN
DRAIN INTO A COMMON OUTLET.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A CATCHMENT WATER BUDGET:

A

INPUTS = OUTPUTS
* INPUTS = PRECIPITATION (RAIN + SNOWFALL)
* OUTPUTS = RUNOFF + ET
* RUNOFF = STREAM + GROUNDWATER
* ET = EVAPOTRANSPIRATION: WATER RETURNED TO THE ATMOSPHERE VIA
TRANSPIRATION BY PLANTS AND EVAPORATION FROM WETTED SURFACES (SOIL, ROADS,
ETC.).
* ET IS TYPICALLY THE LARGEST COMPONENT OF WATER LOSS (50-75%);
HIGHER VALUES FOR WARMER AND DRIER CLIMATES, LOWER VALUES FOR
COOL, HUMID CLIMATES.
* OF THE REMAINING FRACTION (“RUNOFF”), STREAM FLOW TYPICALLY
ACCOUNTS FOR A LARGE PROPORTION OF WATER LOSS (GROUNDWATER
LOSSES ARE SMALL).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

evapotranspiration

A

highest rates in vegetated areas because plants increase surface areas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

RAINFALL & RUNOFF

A

Tropical climate:
seasonal variation in
rainfall determines
discharge (little
seasonal variation in ET
where To is similar year-
round).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

watershed runoff

A

The amount of water draining from a
catchment is determined by the
area of the catchment and the
amount of rainfall.
When comparing among catchments
of varying size, it is useful to
convert discharge to water yield
(runoff per unit area).
water yield = discharge/area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Global-scale variation in
precipitation and river
discharge (as water
yield).

A

SA receives greatest
rainfall (1600 mm) and
has greatest runoff (700
mm).
* NA, Asia, EU & Africa
have similar rainfall, but
vary in runoff.
* AU has lowest rainfall
(450 mm) and runoff (40
mm).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

WATER QUALITY AREA

A

DEPENDENT ON LAND USE IN THE SURROUNDING BASIN.
* FORESTED CATCHMENTS GENERALLY HAVE GOOD WATER QUALITY EXCEPT
WHERE IMPACTED BY ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS (E.G., ACID RAIN).
* AGRICULTURE: ASSOCIATED WITH SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
TRANSPORT INTO STREAMS. ALSO, NUTRIENTS FROM FERTILIZER AND
MANURE APPLICATION, AND AGROCHEMICALS SUCH AS HERBICIDES AND
PESTICIDES.
* URBANIZATION: DISCHARGE FROM INDUSTRY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANTS (POINT SOURCES). ALSO, RUNOFF FROM IMPERVIOUS
SURFACES (E.G., LEAD, PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, ETC.).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

urban dominated sites

A

ELEVATED CONDUCTIVITY
(EC) DUE TO ROAD SALT
RUNOFF.
* LOW DISSOLVED OXYGEN
AND HIGH OXYGEN DEMAND
(COD).
* HIGH TOTAL NUTRIENTS (TN,
TP) AND DISSOLVED
NUTRIENTS (NH4, NO3).
* HIGH ALGAL ABUNDANCE
(CHLOROPHYLL-A; CHL-A).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

WHAT IS A STREAM?

A

HYDROLOGY & PHYSICAL HABITAT
* UNIDIRECTIONAL FLOW ALONG AN
ELEVATION GRADIENT
* HIGH RATIO OF CONTRIBUTING AREA
(LAND) TO STREAM SURFACE AREA
* FORCE OF WATER MOVING DOWNHILL
INTERACTS WITH LOCAL GEOLOGY TO
CREATE AND SHAPE CHANNEL
* WIDTH, DEPTH, SUBSTRATE
COMPOSITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

LINKING PHYSICS & BIOLOGY

A

HYDROLOGY & PHYSICAL HABITAT
* DEFINED BY UNIDIRECTIONAL
FLOW ALONG AN ELEVATION
GRADIENT
* HIGH RATIO OF CONTRIBUTING
AREA TO STREAM SURFACE AREA
* FORCE OF WATER MOVING
DOWNHILL INTERACTS WITH
LOCAL GEOLOGY TO SHAPE
CHANNEL

BIOLOGY
* ADAPTED TO LIFE IN FLOWING
WATER
* DOMINATED BY BENTHIC
PROCESSES
* BIOFILMS COVER SURFACES
(ROCKS, WOODY DEBRIS, ETC.)
* BIOFILMS: A COMMUNITY OF
MICROSCOPIC PLANTS AND
ANIMALS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

BIOFILMS

A

AUTOTROPHS (ALGAE) TAKE UP
DISSOLVED INORGANIC NUTRIENTS
(N,P) AND USE ENERGY FROM
SUNLIGHT TO CARRY OUT
PHOTOSYNTHESIS THEREBY
PRODUCING NEW ORGANIC MATTER.
* HETEROTROPHS (BACTERIA, ETC.)
USE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
PRODUCED BY ALGAE AS THEIR
ENERGY SOURCE. THE BREAKDOWN
OF ORGANIC MATTER RELEASES
INORGANIC NUTRIENTS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
RIPARIAN CANOPY & LEAF LITTER
THE PRESENCE OF A RIPARIAN CANOPY IS IMPORTANT NOT ONLY IN REGULATING THE LIGHT CLIMATE OF STREAMS, BUT ALSO FOR PROVIDING ORGANIC MATER INPUTS IN THE FORM OF LEAF LITTER. * INPUTS OF TERRESTRIAL PLANT MATERIALS SUPPORT SECONDARY PRODUCTION IN STREAM FOOD WEBS.Inputs of organic mater from outside of the ecosystem (e.g., from forest to stream) are referred to as “subsidies”.
26
GROWTH OF STREAM ALGAE
Effects of light and nutrient availability on the accumulation of benthic algal biomass in experimental stream channels. Nutrient levels are concentrations of SRP (μg/L). Where there is a loss of canopy shading and elevated nutrient inputs (e.g., urban and agricultural streams) excess growth of stream algae may occur.
27
STORM EVENTS & BENTHIC ALGAE
* STORMS THAT RESULT IN HIGH DISCHARGE ARE A FORM OF ECOLOGICAL DISTURBANCE (SIMILAR TO FIRES AND BLOWDOWN IN FOREST). * INCREASED WATER VELOCITY SCOURS ALGAE AND SUBSTRATES. * THEIR RECOVERY FOLLOWING DISTURBANCE IS DICTATED BY TEMPERATURE, LIGHT AND NUTRIENTS. FREQUENCY OF STORM EVENTS DICTATES THE IMPORTANCE OF SCOUR VS. GRAZING IN CONTROLLING ALGAL ABUNDANCE * URBAN STREAMS PRONE TO FREQUENT DISTURBANCE DUE TO IMPERVIOUS SURFACES.
28
LEAF LITTER & AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
LEAVES BECOME WATERLOGGED AND SINK. COLONIZATION BY BACTERIA AND FUNGI BEGINS ALMOST IMMEDIATELY. * SHREDDERS (AQUATIC INSECTS) FRAGMENT LEAVES CREATING MORE SURFACE AREA FOR BACTERIAL DECOMPOSERS.
29
SHREDDERS:
FRAGMENT LEAVES CREATING MORE SURFACE AREA FOR BACTERIAL DECOMPOSERS. CONVERT COARSE PARTICULATE ORGANIC MATTER (CPOM) TO FINE PARTICULATE ORGANIC MATTER (FPOM).
30
GRAZERS:
SCRAPE ALGAE AND BACTERIA FROM LEAVES AND OTHER SURFACES.
31
COLLECTOR-FILTERERS:
CAPTURE FPOM DERIVED FROM TERRESTRIAL (LEAF LITTER) AND INTERNAL (ALGAE) SOURCES.
32
PREDATORS
EAT OTHER INVERTEBRATES
33
STREAM DRAINAGE NETWORK
STREAM ORDER: NUMBERS ASSIGNED BASED ON BRANCHING PATTERNS. 1ST ORDER = ‘HEADWATER’ STREAMS (MAY BE EPHEMERAL) 2-4 ORDER: SMALL STREAMS OF INCREASING FLOW. >5TH ORDER: RIVERS OF VARYING SIZE WITH INCREASING STREAM ORDER, STREAMS GET LARGER (GREATER DISCHARGE, ALSO WIDER). WITH GREATER WIDTH, THERE IS LESS RIPARIAN SHADING – LESS LEAF LITTER INPUTS, BUT MORE SUN FOR ALGAE.
34
RIVER CONTINUUM CONCEPT
Predictable changes in invertebrate functional feeding groups arise from longitudinal variation in organic matter inputs. Headwater streams (low light, high leaf litter): * shredders - take large food (leaves) and produce fine particulate organic matter * collectors - spin nets or use setae to collect FPOM Middle order streams (more light): * scrapers - feed on biofilms Large order streams (more light, lower water velocity) * collectors - collect FPOM from upstream and locally produced phytoplankton
35
HOW STREAMS WORK: FOOD WEB PERSPECTIVE
GREEN FOOD WEB: HERBIVORES FEED ON ALGAE AND ARE IN TURN FED UPON BY PREDATORS * BROWN FOOD WEB: DETRITIVORES FEED ON LEAF LITTER AND ARE FED UPON BY PREDATORS IN STREAMS, EXTERNAL INPUTS OF OM (LEAF LITTER) MAY BE MUCH LARGER THAN INTERNAL PRODUCTION (ALGAE)
36
SOURCES OF ORGANIC MATTER TO STREAMS
AUTOCHTHONOUS (INTERNALLY-DERIVED): PRIMARY PRODUCERS IN STREAMS, PRINCIPALLY BENTHIC ALGAE. * ALLOCHTHONOUS (EXTERNAL INPUTS): TERRESTRIAL PLANT PRODUCTION THAT IS EXPORTED TO STREAMS IN DISSOLVED (DOM) AND PARTICULATE (POM) FORMS. * ALTHOUGH AUTOCHTHONOUS OM IS MORE LABILE, ALLOCHTHONOUS OM IS QUANTITATIVELY DOMINANT, PARTICULARLY IN FORESTED STREAMS WHERE THE RIPARIAN CANOPY CONTRIBUTES LEAF LITTER AND SUPPRESSES BENTHIC ALGAE PRODUCTION.
37
Stream Monitoring Parameters
Physical: streamflow (discharge), temperature.  Chemical: basic water quality attributes (pH, dissolved oxygen) as well as a wide range of micropollutants (metals, herbicides, pharmaceuticals, etc.).  Biological: harmful bacteria (E. coli) as well as community-based metrics that are indicators of biological integrity (aquatic insects & fish).
38
Physical Properties: Streamflow
In urban environments, the presence of impervious surfaces (roofs, pavement) prevents infiltration of rainwater into the ground and results in rapid runoff. High runoff during storm events results in unnaturally high streamflow conditions. These cause stream bank and bed erosion. Erosion of bed and bank materials results in high mortality of fish and aquatic insect communities, and results in the export of sediment to downstream areas (lakes, estuaries).
39
Runoff as a cause of impairment in urban streams
Urban streams have a “flashy” hydrograph (rapid changes in water level & discharge) due to runoff from impervious surfaces. Consequences: stream erosion and incision. Example: water level in Reedy Creek.
40
Urban stream syndrome
High discharge during storm events  Channelization & incision  Homogenization of habitat & Reduced biodiversity  Loss of ecological function
41
Physical Properties: Temperature
Human activities can alter stream temperature both directly (e.g., discharge of heated effluent, loss of riparian shading) and indirectly (via rising air temperatures). These may cause stream conditions outside of thermal tolerance for aquatic organisms. Stream shading provided by mature, young and post-burn forest. Loss of shading may arise from timber harvesting or clearing of land for agriculture or development.
42
Physical Properties: Conductivity
A measure of the ability of water to carry an electrical charge. Conductivity is directly related to the amount of dissolved substances in water. Elevated conductivity in streams is often an indicator of pollution
43
Road salt
Road salt runoff results in elevated levels of stream conductivity and chloride following snowfall events in city of Richmond. Salinization of freshwaters is a widespread problem: impacts on aquatic life, drinking water sources. How to balance human risk (safe roads) and ecological harm?
44
Physical Properties: Dissolved Gases
Dissolved oxygen is an important water quality attribute as many species are intolerant of low oxygen conditions. Oxygen concentrations in water are determined in part by temperature (solubility). Low oxygen conditions in streams may be indicative of organic matter pollution (e.g., sewage). Organic matter is decomposed by bacteria which consume oxygen in the process.
45
Dissolved Oxygen
Wastewater treatment plants and other industries may discharge effluent that when released into the environment causes oxygen depletion. COD = chemical oxygen demand. Presence of reduced chemical compounds (e.g., NH4) results in oxygen consumption as these are oxidized (e.g., NO3). BOD = biological oxygen demand. Dissolved and particulate organic matter that is decomposed resulting in oxygen consumption by bacteria.
46
Stream Monitoring: Chemical Properties
A long list of potential chemicals of interest.  Naturally occurring substances that may be present in excess amounts: e.g., sediments, mineral nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus), trace metals (Al, Zn, Cu).  Man-made compounds that do not naturally occur in the environment: PCBs, herbicides, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, microplastics.
47
Biological Monitoring: Bacteria
Escherichia coli (E. coli) - a coliform bacterium found in the lower intestine of warm- blooded organisms. Most strains are harmless, but its presence in the environment is indicative of fecal contamination.  The presence of E. coli poses a hazard to human health, particularly in drinking water, but also through recreational contact.  Sources include sewage, urban runoff (pet waste & wildlife) and agricultural runoff (livestock operations).  Water samples are incubated under specific conditions to determine the number of colony forming units (cfus).
48
urban streams and water quality
In cities which have combined sewer systems, rain events result in the release of wastewater to the environment.
49
e. coli
E. Coli levels exceeding 126 cfu are considered unsafe for recreational contact.
50
Stream Monitoring: Biological Indicators
Poor water quality results in a loss of biodiversity as sensitive species are unable to survive and reproduce and communities become dominated by tolerant species.  Biota are often used as indicators of water quality: diverse, balanced communities of stream insects and fish are indicative of good water quality conditions.
51
Chemical vs. Biological Monitoring
Advantages of biomonitoring: Aquatic communities can be used to directly assess whether conditions are suitable for aquatic life. Biota integrate the effects of stressors over their life span, thereby providing a longer-term perspective on the suitability of the site to support aquatic life (vs. spot sample of chemistry). Disadvantages of biomonitoring: Requires skilled taxonomists to identify fish, insects, algae (not automated, more difficult to replicate, more expensive vs. chemistry). Does not provide information on stressors (what is the cause of the impairment to aquatic life?).
52
Aquatic Bioindicator Assemblages
Algae: planktonic and attached species used in assessment of lakes and streams, respectively.  Benthic macroinvertebrates: bottom-dwelling animals (many are insects) that can be seen without magnification.  Fish: long-lived and more mobile (integrate conditions over greater space and time).
53
Metrics used for Bioassessment
Individuals:  Species-specific tolerance to pollution  Health: presence of lesions, abnormalities, body condition. Communities:  Diversity: number of species present, relative proportions of individuals.  Functional groups: e.g., insect scrapers, shredders, grazers, predators, etc.  Number of native vs. invasive species
54
Benthic Macroinvertebrates as Indicators
Maccaffertium- flatheaded mayflies, relatively pollution intolerant.  Fast-water specialists (riffles) that cling to hard substrate and feed primarily by scraping algae (diatoms).  Disturbance that reduces flow, and sedimentation that buries rocks and benthic algae are primary stressors.  DEQ tolerance value is 5.4/10 (pollution sensitive taxa have values <3).
55
Sampling Stream Fishes
Typically carried out by electrofishing – a weak current is used to immobilize and capture fish. Individuals are identified in the field and released. Generally harmless, though can cause mortality in very small fish. A representative sample of the fish assemblage is obtained by collecting from a length of stream with a mix of habitats (e.g., pools and riffles).
56
Catchment-based management
Cause of impairment: bacteria (from livestock), sediment (erosion), ag chemicals (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides). Install fencing to keep livestock out of streams Maintain riparian plant buffer to remove pollutants No-till farming to reduce erosion & sediment transport
57
Catchment-based management: Urban streams
Cause of impairment: bacteria (from sewer overflows), elevated salinity (from road salt), bed & bank erosion (from stormwater runoff). Install stormwater retention ponds & rain gardens to capture runoff & promote infiltration Eliminate overflows from sewer systems Restore riparian buffers
58
Catchment vs. in-stream approaches to restoration
Catchment-based approaches have the advantage that they treat the problem at the source (reduce run-off and pollutants before they enter the waterway). The challenge is that they are generally very limited in scope relative to the scale of the problem (can’t fix entire catchment). Consider a 3-mile stream in an urban setting – many property owners (private, public, business). What proportion are willing to undertake (pay for) or allow installation of green infrastructure?  In-stream restoration can be used to repair degraded stream channels. but will repairs succeed if proximal causes (livestock, impervious surfaces) are not addressed?
59
Stream Restoration
Typically focus on the physical template of the stream channel.  Field of dreams hypothesis: if you build it, they will come (i.e., if stream habitat is returned to a more natural condition, stream biology and functioning will return).  How do we measure success? The goal of restoration is usually not to return the stream to a pristine state (difficult to achieve in ag or urban setting), but to stabilize the stream to prevent further degradation (bed and bank erosion).
60
Setting goals for restoration: What is a stream supposed to look like?
A riffle-pool sequence develops as a stream's hydrological flow structure alternates from areas of relatively shallow, fast-moving water to deeper, slow-moving water. The sequence commonly occurs at intervals of from 5 to 7 stream widths.  Meandering streams tend to develop a riffle-pool sequence with pools in the outsides of the bends and riffles in the crossovers between one meander to the next.  Habitat diversity fosters biodiversity Examples of pool vs riffle fishes  Fishes and aquatic insects have specialized habitat preferences  Greater habitat diversity results in greater biodiversity  Loss of habitat diversity (urban streams) results in loss of biodiversity
61
Stream restoration
1 km of stream returned to its floodplain  During storm events, water exceeds bankfull capacity and spills into floodplain  Floodplain inundation slows down the water, more opportunity for removal of sediments, nutrients and other pollutants  Meanders and Pool-riffle structure enhances in- stream habitat diversity and biodiversity  Longer transit time of water through the stream channel allows greater opportunity for nutrient uptake by benthic biofilm communities.
62
Wilson Creek Restoration
Benefits Supporting aquatic life designated uses by increasing habitat diversity to foster greater biodiversity Enhancement of stream functioning by slowing downstream transport of water and reducing sediment and nutrient fluxes. Trapping of particulate matter within the floodplain during storm events. Greater transient storage within the stream and floodplain allows for uptake of dissolved inorganic nutrients by biofilms.
63
Managing & restoring urban streams
Changes in stream hydrology resulting from urbanization: Before - rainwater infiltrates soil and is slowly discharged to the stream. Small peak flows following storm events. After - impervious surfaces (roads, rooftops) generate rapid runoff. Large peak flows after storm events.
64
Managing & restoring urban streams
Flood stage: when stream water elevation exceeds bankfull capacity. Before urbanization: water escapes channel and inundates lateral floodplain areas. This reduces the force of water and results in sediment deposition and storage in the floodplain. After urbanization: streams become incised, as bank height increases, water is prevented from escaping into floodplain. Erosive force increases resulting in greater incision and downstream sediment transport.
65
Restoration of Urban streams
Key challenges: impervious surfaces generate stormwater runoff.  High discharge during storm events causes stream bank and bed erosion  Channelization & incision results in loss of habitat complexity and Reduced biodiversity  Loss transient storage and floodplain connectivity reduces ecological function (sediment trapping and nutrient uptake).
66
Management of Urban streams
Historically focused on getting rid of water (to prevent flooding).  Streams were channelized (straightened and deepened) and sometimes lined in concrete – designed to convey water quickly.  Some streams diverted to underground culverts to allow for development.  How to un-do this in an urban setting (engaging private landholders)?
67
Why is stream restoration controversial?
Not in my backyard: re-grading incised stream banks requires earthmoving, which often requires removal of riparian trees. Trees are re-planted following construction, but it may take >20 years for forests to recover. This has led to opposition from local homeowners (e.g., cancellation of Reedy & Rattlesnake creek projects in Richmond).  Does is work? Is there evidence that stream restoration achieves stated goals (e.g., improving stream biodiversity and ecological functioning)?  Some projects successful (e.g., Wilson Creek), others not, most are not monitored.  Assurance of success if especially important where nutrient reduction credits are given.
68
Stream restoration in the context of Chesapeake Bay restoration
The EPA has prescribed a “pollution diet” for the bay, which sets limits on sediment, N and P inputs.  States are required to implement mitigation activities to meet their pollution targets.  Mitigation activities for point sources (e.g., factories & wastewater treatment plants) provide quantifiable results (e.g., lbs of N and P removed).  Mitigation activities for non-point (diffuse) sources do not provide quantitative results. Examples: stream & wetland restoration, no-till ag, stormwater retention basins, etc.  If we give nutrient reduction credits for best management practices (BMPs) that don’t actually work, then we are not achieving actual nutrient reductions.