4. Risk Allocation Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

which covenants are implied where a sale is expressed to be made with full title guarantee?

A

the seller has the right to dispose of the property
the seller will do all it reasonably can, at its own expense to pass on to the buyer the title it purports to give
the property is free from all charges, encumbrances, and third party rights other than those which the seller is unaware and could not reasonably be expected to be aware

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are warranties

A

contractual statements about what is to be acquired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

consequence of a warranty being untrue

A

buyer will have a claim for damages against the warrantor for breach of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what damages are recoverable under hadley v baxendale

A

if it is not too remote:

loss flowing naturally from the breach
loss which was fairly and reasonably in the contemplation of the parties at the time they entered into the contract as the probable result of the breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the aim of contractual damages

A

put buyer in the position they would have been in if the contract had not been breached, subject to the duty to mitigate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how is buyers loss calculated re wrong warranty

A

difference between value of shares if warranty had been true vs actual value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what will the spa provide for re quantification of warranties

A

how the loss should be quantified e.g where profit levels have been warranted, parties may agree a formula specifying an appropriate multiplier to apply to any shortfall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is misrepresentation

A

false statement of fact made by one party to the contract to the other inducing the other party to enter into the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

buyer remedy for misrep

A

rescission - buyer has ability to rescind spa (puts parties back into pre-contract position)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

remedy for innocent or negligent misrep 2(2)

A

damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

bars to rescission

A

impossible to restore parties to pre contract position
bona fide 3rd party rights have been acquired
innocent party knowing of rep takes action affirming the agreement
undue delay in seeking relief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

can an entire agreement clause exclude misrep

A

no thomas witter v tbp industries; express exclusion terms must be included in the contract axa sun

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is a non reliance statement

A

estops buyer from claiming that it entered the agreement in reliance on pre contractual statements made by seller. subject to s3 misrep act reasonableness test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

difference between contractual and tortious damages

A

damages for contract breach is higher - calculates difference paid and actual market valuew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the difference between a warranty and indemnity

A

warranty is an undertaking by seller that a particular state of affairs exists

indemnity is promise to reimburse buyer re a designated type of liability that may arise in the future (amount equalling actual liability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

tax considerations for seller when paying re a warranty

A

s49 TCGA 1992 provides no tax allowance will be made

if liability crystallises, adjustment made to prie of target for CG purposes. if seller makes a payment capital tax adjusted:

  • consideration seller is treated as having received at completion is reduced by amount paid out by warranty claim, reducing gain. seller entitled to refund
  • buyers acquisition cost is reduced its potential gain on subsequent disposal is increased
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

are payments made to buyer under indemnity tax chargeable

A

no Extra Statutory concession d33

18
Q

who gives warranties where there is more than one warrantor

A

buyer will insist on joint and severlal liability

19
Q

which doc sets out how liability is to be allocated

A

deed of contribution

20
Q

who will be unwilling to give warranties

A

minority shareholder
trustee

21
Q

solution for trustee

A

liability limited to net value for time being of the capital of the trust

22
Q

if buyer sells target soon after acquisition, can it assign benefit of warranties and indemnities to new buyer

A

yes - seller will insist on express provision prohibiting assignment

23
Q

how can buyer mitigate risk of potential liabilities stemming from warranties

A

guarantee over assets or third party or parent co
retention of purchase priceh

24
Q

how can buyer retain pp for certain period after completion

A

payment of retention into joint account
retention remitted to seller ona certain date after completion (eg 12 months)
where buyer makes a claim, seller paid after deducting amount of claim
buyer paid the amount of claim within a short period (eg 14 days)
payment of accrued interest on fund to parties in the same proportion they received retention
obligation on buyer to pursue any claims which may delay remittance of fund

25
why will a buyer want to curtail sellers post completion activities
seller has detailed knowledge of target
26
trego v hunt
courts refuse to imply a covenant by seller not to set up in competition
27
implied restraints
not to use or disclose confidential info re business not to represent itself as successor to business or as carrying on the same business not to solicitor customers of business
28
which express undertakings will buyer want to be included in spa
covenant not to engage or concern in any competing business for a specified period after completion covenant not to solicit or entice target customers away who have recently dealt with target for specified period covenant not to solicit from target employees for specified period undertaking not to use / disclose confidential info about target covenatn not to use name of target
29
are restrictive covenants enforceable
to the extent that they are reasonable to protect a legitimate interest of buyer
30
which factors do the courts consider relevant when determining whether a restrictive covenant is reasonable
duration of restraint geographical area of restraint activies restricted
31
duration
buyer will seek to prevent sller from competing for between 1-5 years after completion.
32
what is considered reasonable when dealing with a covenant restricting seller from setting business within a geographical area
must be closely related to area in which target operates
33
can buyer prevent seller from carrying on activities
no- deemed excessive
34
can buyer prevent seller from competing with other businesses the buyer owns or intends to acquire
no- ronbar clause preventing seller from carrying on a business 'similar to' that of target to be too wide
35
what can buyer claim if restrictive covenants are reasonable
damages for breach
36
what is the blue pencil test
where each restrained is contained in a different clause, and expressed to be separate or independent restrictions, even if court considers one too wide the other remains enforceable court strikes out certain parts of a clause leaving remaining parts tillman
37
what if an agreement breaches s2 or 18 competition act 1998
anti competitive terms are unenforceable
38
what does s2 competition act prohibit
agreements or other business arrangements between 2 or more undertakings which may affect trade in the UK and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the UK
39
what does s18 CA 1998 prohibit
activities of one or more undertakings which amount to abuse of dominant position within uk
40
consequence of infringing uk competition law
voids restriction cma can impose fines of up to 10% of undertakings turnover parties may be ordered to modify agreement