5.1 The kingdom of God in Luke Flashcards
(33 cards)
What is the concept of Kingdom used to portray in the Old Test?
- to convey the idea of sovereignity
- as a way of expressing God’s overall authority
What are the differing views about the arrival of the kingdom?
- The past- it was established before Jesus and continues on into the present
- The present- it is made known to the people through the life and teachings of Jesus
- The future- it is an eschatological happening; the second coming of Christ, the parousia
What is the Parousia?
The second coming of christ
Who was Hanz conzelmann?
PAST
A Protestant German theologian, wrote ‘The Theology of St Luke’ 1960
What did Hanz Conzelmann believe about the Kingdom?
PAST
That it was a historical event, the salvation history. Divided into 3 stages
- The age of israel- God’s kingdom was given to his chosen people, the Jews
- Jesus’ ministry ushered in the new age- John the Baptist is the end of the old history of God’s kingdoms and the inauguration of a new phase, where the Kingdom is now available to all people.
- Jesus’ ascension marked the start of the third age- Chrisrians have to spread the message that the age will end in the future; the Parousia
Who is Ian Howard Marshall?
PAST
A scottish new test scholar, focused on biblical ground for faith, and the apostles. Had a historical and theologian view of Luke.
What does Marshall think about Conzelmann’s view?
PAST
Disagrees and as Conzelmann ignores the apocolyptic nature of Luke 21
What did Dodd believe?
PRESENT
- Wrote in ‘The parables of the Kingdom’ that the kingdom was already present in the person of Jesus, evident in the miracles involving exorcisms
The present Kingdom was:
1. Available to all, epsecially those who were least on earth (Luke 13:30)
2. With all people now (Luke 17:21)
Diagrees with a future kingdom because:
1. Jesus used apocolyptic language to refer to his own ministry, e.g Son of Man
2. Judgement usually linked with the future happens in the present when some accept or reject Jesus (Luke 10:16)
What are the criticisms of Dodd?
PRESENT
- All interpretations assume realised eschatology is correct
- The ‘futuristic’ passages had more to do with the eschatology of the early church than Jesus’ own teachings
Who was Albert Schweitzer?
FUTURE
A French/ German theologian who challenged liberal’s theology’s view of Jesus as just a moral teacher, he concluded that Jesus’ life and teachings needed to be seen within historical context of Jewish eschatology at the time
What did Schweitzer believe about Jesus?
- Saw his teachings as central and the Parousia was imminent, believed that Jesus saw himself as the Son of Man who would bring about the Kingdom of God:
- first through his ministry and that of the disciples
- The, when this did not happen, through his suffering and death
- Consistent eschatology: all Jesus’ teachings were pointing to one time, an imminent future
Why do most scholars reject Schweitzer’s consistent eschatology?
FUTURE
- His theory is dependent on the Gospel’s content being chronological
- Jesus’ death is seen as a failure
- It ignores the early church’s view that God intervened through the resurrection and Jesus’ death made salvation possible
Who is Oscar Cullmann?
A lutherean new test scholar, who proposed a third position of the Kingdom of God against Dodd and Schweitzer- redemptive history (God’s saving acts from creation to present)
What does inaugarated eschatology suggest?
PRESENT AND FUTURE
- The kingdom came into being through Jesus’ life
- But will be completed in the future
What is Cullmann’s analogy for inaugarated eschatology?
- Even though D-day saw a decisive battle, the war was not won until VE day
- Jesus’ death and resurrection were compared to D-day and the future Parousia to VE day
What was Marshall’s conclusion?
PRESENT AND FUTURE
The kingdom of God is present and a future reality:
- It was present in the ministry of Jesus; Jesus offers salvation to all.
- Jesus speaks of the future Parousia, a time when Son of Man will come (Luke 21:5-28) and arrive when least expected (Luke 12:40)
Through his parables, what did Jesus mean by Kingdom of God?
Conflicting ideas are:
- Jesus refers to it ‘in your midst’ (17:21), referring to himself
- Yet in the parable of the sower (8:1-15) the kingdom is seen as what makes changes in people’s lives
Did Jesus teach about a present or future kingdom?
This is down to interpretation, depending on the view of eschatology taken
How did Jesus teach about the Kingdom of God?
- Parables- some refer explicitly to rhw kingdom of God; others it is more hidden
- Other teachings- references to the kingdom are made, often in response to questions
- Miracles can be seen as eschatological statements, which announce the arrival of the kingdom and reveal something of its nature
- Events in Jesus’ life are linked to the kingdom, for example his arrival in Jerusalem
What is the meaning and theological significance of the Parable of the sower (Luke 8:1-15)?
- Deals with the question of why all those that hear the message do not act upon it
- The disciples have an inside knowledge; the kingdom is secretly realised in the person of Jesus. It is present now.
- Knowing about the kingdom depends on seeing beyond the superficial, just as in Isaiah 6:9; the kingdom is not immediately seen, it requires faith.
- Conzelmann suggests that it is just the message that is present; the kingdom would come in the imminent future
Why is the parable of the sower important for early believers?
- Warns us against dangers like initial enthusiasm and obsession with possessions
- Teaches us what is required whilst waiting for the delayed Parousia
What is the meaning and theological significance of Jesus and Beelzebul and the sign of Jonah? (luke 11:14-32)
- The people do not see that the kingdom is among them
- The ‘finger of God’ echoes the account of the exodus- the Egyptian magicians, not the israelites, recognise the actions of Moses as the ‘finger of God’. Jesus is asking his audience if history is repeating itself
- Realised eschatology is seen in verse 11:20 ‘The kingdom of God has come upon you”. Jesus driving out demons is a sign that the kingdom of God is present
- in 11:21-23 the people are challenged to see the signs of the kingdom in Jesus- the 2 signs of the messianic age were mastery of evil and gathering in the people of God
- Jesus reproaches the people for not realising the kingdom is present noe. He uses 2 old test examples to make his point: Jesus is greater than Jonah and Soloman
- ‘The sign of Jonah’- Jesus is a sign, like Jonah was to the Ninevites
Why is the Jesus and Beelzebul and the sign of Jonah significant to early believers?
- The early church would have seen itself as the ‘church’ under attack (11:21-22), and needing to continue the fight against Beelzebul
- The teachings fit in with Luke’s savation history- the church belongs to the third age, and they gather to resist sin
- In the ‘sign of Jonah’ redaction critics suggest that Luke removed the reference to the crucifixion and ressurection found in Matthew 12:40, removing the idea that the end had started
What is the meaning and theological significance of the narrow door? (Luke 13:22-30)
- The question Jesus deals with is whether manyor few will be saved. His reply indicates that it is pointless to speculate; it draws attention away from the kingdom of God being present
- The parable is apocolyptic: God is the owner of the house, the door is the way to salvation, and the people knocking are awaiting judgement
- Jews don’t have automatic right to enter the kingdom: they need to respond to Jesus, if they don’t ‘the door’ will close, and if the door closes they miss their oppurtunity to join the kingdom