4 - Attitudes II Flashcards

1
Q

attitudes and behaviour: consistency

A
  • People are motivated to be consistent in their attitudes and behavior
  • Uncomfortable when there is inconsistency
  • Motivated to reduce it

Festinger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Leon Festinger

(When Prophecy Fails, 1956)

A

created theory of cognitive dissonance after observing his grad students whom he asked to join a cult

  • cult would avoid a flood which would cause the end of the world
  • they remained committed to the belief up until the last minute, until they realized that the flood never came
  • the cult became even more committed to the cult and its prophecy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cognitive dissonance

A

Festinger

Cognitive dissonance is an unpleasant state caused by people’s awareness of inconsistency among important beliefs/attitudes and actions/behaviours…..

  • Causes drive to reduce this dissonance, which can lead to attitude change….. esp. when tension between behaviour and attitudes, attitudes will change

magnitude of dissonance = # of dissonant elements x importance / # of consonant elements x importance

  1. people must perceive inconsistency
  2. take personal responsibility for the action
  3. experience uncomfortable physiological arousal
  4. attribute arousal to inconsistency between attitude and behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Festinger & Carlsmith (1959)

A

Participants engage in boring tasks

asked to lie, tell others how much they enjoyed the task, being paid either** 0, $1, $20**

then actual ratings of boringness taken:

no compensation - very boring

$1 - very enjoyable

$20 - boring

cognitive dissonance overcome with 20$, but with $1 attitude shifted instead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Smith (1961)

A

army reservists asked to eat grasshoppers by either positive communicators or negative ones

people said they liked the grasshoper after a negative communicator, since those with positive communicators just justified by saying they did it cause they liked the person who asked (reduced dissonance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Aronson and Mills (1959)

A

female students joined a discussion about sex

had to read either super embarrasing or mildly embarrasing sex passages to join

the actual sex discussion was really boring, but those who did the most effort (most embarrasing) rated it as very enjoyable

the more effort put in to something, the more they will say they like it (dissolving cognitive dissonance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brehm (1956)

A

Spreading of alternatives

given two options, your attitudes toward them are relatively the same…… but after you choose one, your attitude towards it increases and your attitude towards the other decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reducing dissonance

1.

2.

3.

A
  1. justify behavior (Festinger and Carlsmith, Smith)
  2. justify effort (aronson & mills)
  3. justify decisions (spreading of alternatives, Brehm)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

self-perception theory

A

people infer their own attitudes by observing their own behaviours within situations

Zanna & Cooper “pill” study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Zanna & Cooper (1974)

experiment setup

results

A

participants asked to write counter-attitudinal essay pro/con banning controversial speakers from campus

  1. manipulated the illusion to the amount of choice (high/low) the participant had
  2. gave them a pill (actually a placebo) that either made you feel tense, relaxed, or no effects

DV - their agreement/disagreement with the idea of banning controversial speakers (to assess the attitde change from negative to ?)

tense pill - there was no change in attitude in both the high and low choice contidions

no side-effects pill - high choice was big change in attitude…… low choice was easy to justify behaviour, so less attitude change

relaxed pill - high choice agreed very much…… low choice agreed same level as no-side effect group (low)

e.g. the Magnitude of dissonance is greater when there is a greater amount of dissonant elements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LaPiere (1934)

A

toured CA with chinese couple

only one place rejected couple for being Chinese

Later reponses to letters asking about refusing service to Chinese showed that 90% said they would reject

showed the gap between attitudes and behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

spceficicity in attitudes matters

A

- general attitudes don’t predict specific behaviours very well

  • mismatches between attitude object and targets of behaviour leads to poor attitude-behaviour correspondence
  • implicit and explicit attitudes can be different
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Accessibility matters in attitudes

1

2

3

A

attitudes must be accessible to influence behaviour

  • strong, pronounced, clear
  • situational reminders
  • self-awareness…. don’t always know what attitudes are because aren’t thinking about it all the time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

motivation matters in attitude

A

Sivacek & Crano

student’s attitudes towards law that would raise drinkng age

almost all were against it, but younger students more willing to work against the passage of the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

intentions matter in attitude

and theory of reasoned action

A

Theory of Reasoned action - attitudes combine with social/behavioural norms, which lead to intentions…..

….. intentions - motivation to comply with attitude or norm, behaviours thought to achieve a goal…..

which leads to behaviour

e.g. the goal-oriented attitude can guide behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

perceived control matters

and theory of planned behaviour

A

Theory of planned behaviour (azjen)

attitudes + social norms + perceived control lead to intentions and then behaviour….

perceived control - control over how we act

17
Q

McGregor & Cavallo (2011)

A
  1. manipulated perceived control over life through biased questionnaires
  2. assessed intentions to join a campus dating service

men - control didn’t matter due to social norms

women - control mattered tremendously…. high control = greater intentions to join site

18
Q

Influences on whether our attitudes accurately predict specific behaviours

1.

2.

3.

4.

A
  1. accessibility
  2. motivation
  3. intentions
  4. perceived control