7: Structure and Shape of the Finance Function Flashcards
(29 cards)
Mintzberg’s organisational structure: 5 elements
5 elements to the business which is dominated/influenced by varying degrees of these 5 elements
operating core
strategic apex
middle line
technostructure
support staff
Mintzberg’s organisational structures
simple structure
machine bureaucracy
professional bureaucracy
divisionalised structure
adhocracy
missionary
simple structure (Mintzberg)
strategic apex is dominant
little to no middle line, not a lot of managerial control between owners and workers
machine bureaucracy (Mintzberg)
technostructure is enlarged/dominant
manufacturer making highly standardised products
professional bureaucracy (Mintzberg)
operating core is dominant
processes are skilled, complex and non-standardised
- think of an accountancy firm
divisionalised structure (Mintzberg)
middle line is dominant
adhocracy (Mintzberg)
support staff are dominant
high degree of innovation/group working - no need for control or a large tech structure
- think about virtual organisations
missionary (Mintzberg)
little structure and formal control
shared mission/values/ethics/culture hold the organisation together
traditional organisational culture
functional structures - grouped by specialism
geographic/divisional structures
matrix structure - cross-functional teams
contemporary organisational structures
boundaryless organisations
shamrock organisation (Charles Handy)
flatter structures
horizontal structures
unglued/chunked structures
output-focused structures
jobless structures
boundaryless organisations
virtual organisations - no physical remises
modular organisations - manufacturing processes broken down into modules and components
hollow organisations - activities split into core and non-core (which are outsourced)
shamrock organisation (Charles Handy)
driven by the professional core
- professional core
- self-employed
- contingent workforce (people in low level jobs with no career aspirations)
- consumers (DIY - think IKEA, doing some of the work in terms of the overall value chain)
scalar chain and span of control
wider span of control leads to shorter scalar chains and vice versa
- fewer links in the chain of command, delayering the organisation
horizontal vs vertical integration
horizontal - developing competitor/complementary activities to form a new activity with a similar workforce/work pool
vertical - company expanding backwards or forwards
alliance
where an organisation works with one or more external entities
types of alliances
joint ventures - 2 organisations work together to set up a new entity
licences and franchises - licences to sell another organisation’s products or for redistribution, franchises where you get permission to perform someone else’s process on their behalf and you pay a fee
consortium - working together on a specific project
agents - having sales agents market/sell the product on the company’s behalf
strategic alliances - businesses formally agree to work together
new structure of the finance function in the digital age
creation of a pentagon/diamond structure
central bulge as a result of the proliferation of higher-value services and a narrower base at the bottom as a result of automation
different levels of the finance function
L1 - finance leadership
L2 - value partnering
L3 - insight generation
L4 - data extraction
shared service centres (SSC)
example of a reconfiguration and way of internally outsourcing something
driven by globalisation and the idea of offshoring
3 ways to think about competencies to outsource (Lonsdale and Cox)
- core competencies - business should not outsource this
- complementary competences - can be outsourced but only when they are not overly technically complex
- residual competencies - can be outsourced at a basic arms-length transaction
service level agreements (SLA)
lists of KPIs within contracts to ensure that things are done properly
transaction costs
costs associated with doing something
big driver of whether companies want to outsource something
transaction cost theory (Williamson)
an organisation should consider everything it does/every good it makes/every service it provides and ask itself whether it is cheaper to make it in-house or buy it in
2 solutions in the transaction cost theory (Williamson)
hierarchy solution - you make it yourself
market solution - you buy something
- influenced by uncertainty, frequency, asset specificity