7 - Structure & Shape of the Finance Function Flashcards
(146 cards)
The traditional role of finance has been to…
generate info such as financial reports, mgmt account & report on org’s risks and controls.
The contemporary role of finance involves…
Taking info that has been generated (often automatically) & analysing to create insights which add value. The communicate to decision makers.
Mintzberg believed that…
All orgs can be analysed into 5 components according to how they relate to the work of the org & how they prefer to coordinate.
Mintzberg: strategic apex
Drives the direction of the business through control over decision making e.g. board of directors
Mintzberg: technostructure
Drives efficiency through rules and procedures e.g. HR sets employee rules
Mintzberg: Operating core
Perform routine activities of the org in a proficient and standardised manner. The workers who get the actual work done.
Mintzberg: Middle line
Perform mgmt functions of control over resources, processes and business areas.
Mintzberg: Support staff
Provide expertise and service to org.
Outline what Mintzberg diagram looks like
Base = operating core
Connected to strategic apex via middle line
Technostructure & support staff on sides
Mintzberg configuration: simple structure
Strategic apex is dominant, little middle line. Effective in small entrepreneurial orgs where need flexibility. No formal structure & little planning. Control by direct supervision.
Mintzberg configuration: machine bureaucracy
Technostructure is dominant. Control by rules and procedures, highly standardised. Hierarchical structure likely. Good for stable environ where focus on improving perf not solving problems.
Mintzberg configuration: professional bureaucracy
Operating core dominant. Processes too complex to be standardised so control exercised via training, individual expertise and professional ethos. Common in prof firms and hospitals.
Mintzberg configuration: divisionalised
Middle line dominant: org too large/complex to be managed as one = split into divisions. Control via perf measures such as profit. Each division could itself be a machine bureaucracy.
Mintzberg configuration: adhocracy
Support staff dominant as only group providing continuity. Innovation critical & work project based. Teams with mix of skills, few formal controls, work complex & ambiguous. e.g. TV production company.
Mintzberg configuration: Missionary
Little structure or formal control but held together by shared set of values & strong culture. Effective in start-ups / campaigning groups.
State 3 traditional org structres
- Functional
- Geographic & divisional
- Matrix
Functional structure =
employees are grouped by specialism such as finance or marketing.
What’s key aspect of functional systems?
Formal communication systems to ensure info is shared.
Geographic structure =
org arranged according to geographic area.
Matrix structure =
org uses cross-functional teams focusing on a specific product/customer/project. Good for project based orgs.
Which of Mintzberg’s configurations is the matrix structure similar to?
Adhocracy - both good for project based work.
1 pro and 1 con of matrix structure
Pro: very innovative as diff expertise and ideas work together
con: difficult to manage
Name 2 main types of contemporary org structures
- Boundaryless
2. Shamrock
Boundaryless orgs =
Focus on flexibility - minimise or eliminate formality and chains of command to focus on speed and flexibility.