Indications Flashcards
Highlights current AHA indications for Brady, Tachy and CRT therapy. Currently weighted 9% in the CCDS exam.
List the 3 class I indications for SND.
- Symptomatic documented brady / pauses
- Symptomatic chronotropic incompetence
- SND resultant of drug therapy of which there are no alternatives
List the 5 class I indications for AV Block.
- 3rd or 2nd degree AVB + Symptomatic bradycardia
- Pauses >3s or HR <40bpm
- AF pauses >5s
- Post AVN ablation
- Surgical LV dysfunction
What is the one Class IIb indication for SND?
Minimally symptomatic with HR <40bpm during awake hours.
List the 2 class IIb indications for AV Block.
- Neuromuscular diseases
- AV block during drug use where block is recurrent
List the 3 class I indications for bifasicular block.
- Advanced 2nd or intermittent 3rd degree block
- Mobitz II
- Alternating BBB
Which pacing indication class is the following?
‘Asymptomatic CHB with HR >40bpm’.
Class IIa.
What 4 things are typically present in class I ICD indications?
- Survivor of VF or VT
- LVEF <40% due to prior MI
- Recorded or inducible VF/VT
- NYHA class I, II or III
Not necessarily all at the same time.
The phrase ‘‘It is reasonable’’ typically relates to what indication class?
Class IIa.
The phrase ‘‘may be considered’’ typically relates to what indication class?
Class IIb.
List the only class I indication for reflex syncope.
Recurrent 3 second pauses with syncope from CS stimulation.
Yes / No
Does asymptomatic Mobitz II indicate pacing?
Yes.
Has a high risk of progression vs. Mobitz I which is lower risk.
Yes / No
If symptoms are due to AV block, should we permanently pace?
Yes - Class I indication.
True / False
Which class applies?
‘A-pacing is recommended over V-pacing for sypmtomatic patients with SND’.
True - Class I indication.
Which class applies with respect to permanent PPM insertion?
‘SND, Symptomatic, Intact AV conduction, no evidence of conduction abnormality’.
Class I indication.
Either DR or SR pacing is recommended at class I in this instance.
Yes / No
Should this device be programmed to minimise RV pacing (list indication class)?
‘SND, Symptomatic, DR pacemaker in-situ and intact AV conduction’.
Yes - Class IIa indication.
Yes / No
Should a device be implanted in this patient (list indication class)?
‘SND, Symptomatic, Frequent Vp is not expected or patient has significant co-morbidities that are likely to determine survival’.
Yes - Class IIa indication.
SR permanent pacing is reasonable for this patient.
Which class applies?
‘Reversible, transient causes of AVB such as lyme carditis should have medical therapy including temporary pacing if required before determination of a permanent pacing system’.
Class I indication.
Which class applies with respect to permanent PPM insertion?
‘Second or third degree AVB, chronically stable doses of necessary anti arrhythmic medication’.
Class IIa indication.
It is reasonable to proceed with a permanent system without observation of washout.
Which class applies with respect to device insertion?
‘Second or third degree AVB associated with cardiac sarcoidosis and survival >1yr’.
Class IIa indication.
Permanent PPM or ICD (if required).
Which class applies with respect to permanent PPM insertion?
‘Second or third degree AVB associated with thyroid abnormalities without myxedema’.
Class IIb indication.
Permanent pacing without further observation for reversibility may be considered.
Which class applies with respect to temporary transvenous pacing?
‘Symptomatic, Second or third degree AVB that is refractory to medical therapy’.
Class IIa indication.
Which class applies?
‘Opt for an externalised active fixation lead over a passive fixation temporary lead’.
For patients who require prolonged temporary pacing.
Class IIa indication.
Which class applies with respect to temporary transcutaneous pacing?
Second or third degree AVB with haemodynamic compromise refractory to antibradycardic medication’.
Class IIb indication.
Temporary transcutaneous pacing may be considered until a temporary transvenous or permanent pacemaker is placed.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient (list class)?
‘1st degree AVB or Mobitz I or 2:1 block at the level of the AV node with symptoms that do not always correlated to the block’.
No - Class III indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient (list class)?
‘Asymptomatic, 1st degree AVB or Mobitz I or 2:1 block at the level of the AV node’.
No - Class III indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient (list class)?
‘Symptomatic AVB with reversible cause, however AVB persists despite optimal treatment of underlying cause’.
Yes - Class I indication.
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient (list class)?
‘Symptomatic AVB with reversible cause, AVB resolves and does not return following optimal treatment of underlying cause’.
No - Class III indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient (list class)?
‘Patient has vagally mediated AVB without symptoms’.
No - Class III indication.
Which class applies with respect to PPM insertion?
‘Acquired Mobitz II, high grade AVB or 3rd degree AVB without reversible cause’.
Class I indication.
Irrespective of symptoms a device should be implanted.
Which class applies?
‘Neruomuscular disease and associated conduction disease with evidence of 2nd or 3rd degree AVB, Survival >1yr’.
Class I indication.
Irrespective of symptoms a device should be implanted.
True / False
The following is a Class I indication for permanent pacing.
‘Patient has AF with symptomatic bradycardia’.
True.
True / False
The following is a Class IIa indication for pacing.
‘Patient develops AVB as a result of guideline directed therapy for which there is no alternative and continued treatment is necessary’.
False - Class I.
Pacing is recommended to increase HR and improve symptoms.
Which class applies with respect to permanent pacing?
‘Infiltrative cardiomyopathy and Mobitz II or CBH with a survival >1yr’.
Class IIa indication.
True / False
The following is a class IIb indication for permanent pacing.
‘Patients with gene mutations and a PR interval >240ms and LBBB with survival >1yr’.
False - Class IIa indication.
True / False
The following is a class I indication for permanent pacing.
‘Marked 1st degree or Mobitz I with symptoms clearly attributable to the AVB’.
False - Class IIa indication.
Which class applies with respect to permanent pacing?
‘Neuromuscular disease, PR >240ms, QRS >120ms or fascicular block, survivability >1yr’.
Class IIb indication.
Is DR pacing recommended over SR pacing - if so, which class?
‘Patient has SND and AVB’.
DR pacing is recommended over SR - Class I indication.
Which class applies?
‘AVB patient who requires permanent pacing but is not expected to Vp frequently or has significant comorbidities likely to dictate clinical outcome and that may limit benefit of a DR system, SR ventricular pacing is effective’.
Class I indication.
Is revising to a DR system is recommended, if so - which class?
‘Patient in sinus rhythm with a SR system whom develops pacemaker syndrome’.
Class I indication.
Is it reasonable to choose systems that maintain physiologic ventricular activation such as CRT or HIS bundle over RV pacing in patients such as these, if so - which class?
‘AVB patients indicated for permanent pacing, EF between 36-50%, Vp >40%’.
Yes - Class IIa indication.
True / False
The following is a class IIa indication.
‘AVB at the level of AV node & indicated for permanent pacing, HIS bundle may be considered to maintain physiological activation’.
False - Class IIb indication.
Yes / No
Should an atrial lead be implanted in the following patient - what class?
‘Patients with permanent or persistent AF in whom rhythm control is not planned’.
No - Class III indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - what class?
‘1:1 AV conduction, normal PR, exhibits syncope and BBB with HV >70ms or evidence of infranodal block’.
Yes - Class I indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - what class?
‘1:1 AV conduction with normal PR - Patient exhibits alternating BBB’.
Yes - Class I indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - what class?
‘1:1 AV conduction, normal PR, diagnosed Kearns-Sayre syndrome and conduction disorders, expected survivability >1yr’.
Yes - Class IIa indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - which class?
‘1:1 AV conduction, normal PR, diagnosed Anderson-Fabry disease, QRS >110ms, expected survivability >1yr’.
Yes - Class IIb indication.
Class IIb is debatable due to weaker evidence.
Yes / No
Should a CRT permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - which class?
‘1:1 AV conduction, normal PR, HF, reduced LVEF (36-50%), LBBB, QRS >150ms’.
Yes - Class IIb indication.
Class IIb is debatable due to weaker evidence.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - which class?
‘1:1 AV conduction, normal PR, isolated conduction disease and asymptomatic’.
No - Class III indication.
Which class applies with respect to placement of transcutaneous pacing pads?
‘High risk of development of intraoperative or periprocedural bradycardia’.
Class IIa indication.
Yes / No
Should prophylactic temporary transvenous pacing be performed - which class?
‘Patients who have LBBB and require PA catheterisation for intraoperative monitoring’.
No - Class III indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - which class?
‘Postoperative SND or AVB associated with symptoms or haemodynamic instability that does not resolve after coronary artery bypass surgery’.
Yes - Class I indication.
Yes / No
Should there be routine placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires - which class?
‘Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery’.
Yes - Class IIa indication.
Yes / No
Should you place a permanent epicardial LV lead intraoperatively - which class?
‘Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery that likely need future CRT or Vp’.
Yes - Class IIb indication.
Class IIb is debateable due to weaker evidence.
Yes / No
Should you place temporary epicardial pacing wires - which class?
‘Patients undergoing surgery for AF’.
Yes - Class I indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient?
‘New postoperative SND or AVB with associated symptoms or haemodynamic instability that does not resolve after AF surgery’.
Yes - Class I indication.
Should you intraoperatively place a permanent epicardial LV lead - which class?
‘Patients undergoing AF surgery that likely need future CRT or Vp’.
Class IIb indication.
Class IIb is debateable due to weaker evidence.
Yes / No
Should you place temporary epicardial pacing wires - which class?
‘Patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement/repair’.
Class I indication.
True / False
The following is a class IIa indication for permanent pacing.
‘Postoperative SND or AVB associated with symptoms or haemodynamic instability that does not resolve after aortic valve surgery’.
False - Class I indication.
Yes / No
Should you intraoperatively place a permanent epicardial LV lead - which class?
‘Patients undergoing aortic valve surgery who will likely need future CRT or Vp’.
Yes - Class IIb indication.
Class IIb is debateable due to weaker evidence.
True / False
The following is class I indication for permanent pacing.
‘New postoperative SND or AVB with associated symptoms or haemodynamic instability that does not resolve after mitral valve surgery’.
True - Class I indication.
Yes / No
Should you intraoperatively place a permanent epicardial LV lead - which class?
‘Patients undergoing mitral valve surgery who will likely need future CRT or Vp’.
Yes - Class IIa indication.
Yes / No
Should you intraoperatively place a permanent epicardial LV lead?
‘Patients undergoing aortic valve surgery who will likely need future CRT or Vp’.
Yes - Class IIb indication.
Class IIb is debateable due to weaker evidence.
Yes / No
Should you place temporary epicardial wires - which class?
‘Patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery’.
Yes - Class I indication.
Which class applies for permanent pacing?
‘New postoperative SND or AVB with associated symptoms or haemodynamic instability that does not resolve after tricuspid valve surgery’.
Class I indication.
Yes / No
Should you intraoperatively place permanent epicardial leads at the time of surgery - which class?
‘Patients undergoing mitral valve surgery & high risk of postop high degree AVB’.
Yes - Class IIa indication.
Yes / No
Should a permanent pacing system be implanted in this patient - which class?
‘New AVB following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with associated symptoms or haemodynamic instability that does not resolve’.
Yes - Class I indication.