Religious Experience - greater power?

Question 1

Rel Exp greater power - Intro

Answer 1

conjure up wide and diverse variety, often deeper knowledge unique yet encouraging, despite terms doesnt✏️, for WJ “direct sensible exp’s” however

Question 2

Rel Exp greater power - P1

Answer 2

assumption first made that genuine, basis for WJ criteria, for him changes and prof effects inspo for basis, whilst judging🍎….

CFD critical treatment, for ex we interpret in ways we understand, rel=rel framework🖼nonB=purely natural, emphasises SUB and profound only for that person,

CC CONVERSION cannot dismiss! change

equal as believer never 1st✋🏻insight, no widespread impact💥

Question 3

Rel exp greater power - P2

Answer 3

alt exp SWINB principle of cred and test, should accept unless unTW or💊 as no reason,

cred cannot overcome when think… but actually exp…,

CC REL WAY IN?🚪🔑have to take leap and interp as God. if rel was evidential removes need for faith🙏🏽

not in rels favour, re-emphasised SUB

Question 4

Rel exp greater power - P3

Answer 4

Freud psych challenge neurosis from childhood insec, hallucinations for security

IN FAVOUR OF RE WOULD NOT SEE AS CRITICISM- god could work through psyche, cannot 📌down corp

Criticism weak, can easily pin down corp, evident people in moment carried away w emotion, pastor 🍥up frenzy, no surprise hysterical!

Question 5

Other assumption to examine…

Answer 5

IS IT GOD CAUSING THESE EXPERIENCES????

even if experiences = genuine, no other explanation

still quite step to claim exp must be god

CC: “Why can’t God choose to reveal himself in way we comprehend?”🙏🏽💆🏼🙇🏻‍♀️
CR: still issues- why some not others, wholly otherness