Guest Lectures Flashcards
What is the aim of the FOODcents adult nutrition
education programme?
To increase our understanding of individual and
societal factors that increase the risk of cancer in
the community, and through this understanding
develop more effective polices and programs to
reduce cancer risk in the community.
To encourage dietary improvement and reduce the risk of diet-related
disease among the disadvantaged
Specifically addresses consumption behaviours associated with risk of chronic
disease
Designed to increase knowledge and motivation to:
(a)increase consumption of fruit, vegetables, and cereals
(b)decrease consumption of foods high in sugar, fat, and salt
(c) improve food expenditure according to the healthy diet pyramid
Primary focus areas for FOODcents?
Alcohol Nutrition Obesity Physical activity Sun exposure Tobacco
What is the problem?
1/5 deaths are associated with poor diet
Poor dietary intake = risk factor for disease + mortality
Adequate intake of fruits, vegetables, fibre etc. important to reducing risk
Intake levels fall well below recommended targets
What is the solution to FOODcents problem?
Nutrition education is an intervention strategy that can be used to create
health- and nutrition-promoting environments
Nutrition education enables individuals to make healthy food choices
Typically targeted at disadvantaged groups (e.g., low SES)
Why?
Lower SES is associated with higher levels of overweight/obesity and resulting weight-related
illnesses
Lower SES have higher than average intakes of unhealthy foods and lower than average intakes of
fruits and vegetables
What is foodcents?
Long-standing nutrition education programme delivered to disadvantaged
groups in Western Australia
Piloted in regional WA in 1992
Implemented state-wide in 1995
How was the Foodcents curriculum developed?
Principles of the Precede–Proceed programme planning model followed
Work with target groups to identify knowledge gaps and other barriers to engaging in recommended behaviours
Develop content that addresses the gaps and barriers
Formative research conducted
Identified primary factors preventing lower-SES individuals from achieving a
healthy diet
How many sessions? Locations? Target groups? of Foodcents?
Course duration
Single-session: 1-2 hours in duration, primarily focuses on a specific issue
Multi-session: Up to 8 sessions, covers a broad range of topics
Course location
Metropolitan and regional areas
Target group
Lower income + disadvantaged adults (but all adults welcome)
What do program developers need to consider when running education courses with disadvantaged groups?
Literacy levels
Presence of a translator for immigrant participants
Information materials suitable in content and length
Face-to-face approach
Access to course (i.e., location)
Free and ample parking
Close to public transport
Disability-friendly
Extensive use of in-session activities designed to actively engage participants
with the course content
For example:
The instructor supplies food packets (processed foods) and pictures of fresh
foods (fruits and vegetables) for participants to classify
Tape is used to outline the segmented healthy eating pyramid on the floor and
participants place the packets/pictures where they think they belong
Guided discussion with the group results in items being progressively moved
until all items are in their correct locations
What are the 3 types of evaluation?
Process: Was the program implemented as intended?
Outcome: Did the program meet its objectives?
Impact: Did the program achieve its ultimate goal?
FOODcents evaluation consultation with who?
Cancer Council, Foodbank and Australian redcross
What is FOODcents evaluation process?
2 years Pre- and post-session surveys (n = 927) Online survey (n = 96) Focus groups (x5) Observation episodes (x23)
Pilot testing with 90 course participants prior to formal implementation
Accommodate literacy needs of participant while maximising rigour
Different versions developed to ensure they were suitable in content and
length
Long questionnaires designed for groups comprising more literate
participants
Long questionnaires designed for participants attending multi-session
courses
What were the results of the knowledge test?
Significant improvements in food categorisation
Significant improvements in food label reading
Significant improvements in budgeting (no differences between SES)
What were the results in behaviour change?
Significant improvements in: Wholemeal bread products Legumes/beans Soft drink/cordial Biscuits/cakes Using low-salt alternatives
What race did the FOODcent’s program also evaluate its effectiveness in?
Indigenous Australians
Was the FOODcents program effective for Indigenous Australians?
YES
Although not designed for an Aboriginal population, FOODcents
was at least as effective for this group
Superior outcomes with Aboriginal participants on some key
outcomes