8. Early Attachment & Later Relationships Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

What helps explain adult relationships

A

Bowbly’s internal working model - looked at how our childhood attachments influence adult relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Internal working model: SECURE attachment

A
  • If a child has a SECURE attachment to a sensitive caregiver, they are likely to see themselves as worthy of being loved.
  • They are then likely to form future secure relationships.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Internal working model: INSECURE attachment

A
  • If a child has an INSECURE attachment w a caregiver who rejects them, they are likely to see themselves as unworthy of being loved.
  • They are then likely to form future insecure relationships.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

See diagram on pg38 for steps

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Hazan & Shaver (1987) do

A

Developed a study to explore how early attachment can predict/influence adult relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Method of Hazan & Shaver (1987)

A

Hazan & Shaver conducted a ‘love quiz’ in a local newspaper. The quiz had 2 parts: 1st assessed the attachment type of each person w their parents. 2nd involved questions asking abt their current beliefs abt romantic love.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Results of Hazan & Shaver (1987)

A
  • The first 620 responses were analysed. Found a correlation between type of childhood attachment & ppl’s later views on romantic love.
  • SECURE children were more likely to have happy/trustworthy relationships.
  • INSECURE-AVOIDANT children ended up fearing intimacy.
  • INSECURE-RESISTANT children were more likely to be worried that they weren’t loved in their relationships.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conclusion of Hazan & Shaver (1987)

A

Hazan & Shaver concluded that their findings provided SUPPORT for Bowlby’s internal working model - that early attachments do influence adult relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation of Hazan & Shaver (1987): CONS

A
  1. Quiz relied on ppl thinking back to childhood - isnt always accurate.
  2. Used volunteer sample, so certain type of person might be more likely to respond.
  3. Ppl may have answered untruthfully to show themselves in a better light (social desirability bias).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluation of Hazan & Shaver (1987): PROS

A
  1. Study has been repeated in 2003, & found similar results - reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Adult attachment interview

A
  • Psychologists developed a way to try to scientifically assess the relationship between early childhood attachments & later adult attachments.
  • They came up w the adult attachment interview:
  • Based off the idea that it doesnt matter exactly what the childhood attachment was - its how it was remembered. This again supports Bowlby’s internal working model.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who proposed the Adult attachment interview

A

Main et al (1985)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the Adult attachment interview involve

A
  • The semi-structured interview involves a series of Q’s abt childhood attachment relationships, & how these were seen to influence later relationships.
  • Interviewee asked to give 5 adjectives explaining relationship w each of parents.
  • Then asked to explain why they chose each adjective.
  • Other Q’s asked abt times they got upset, if they ever felt rejected, how they believe their early experiences influenced their adult attachments.
  • Results are then classified by trained coders into a category - secure, dismissing, preoccupied or unresolved/disorganised.
  • Main et al (1985) went on to show that the categories of adult relationships could be predicted from ppl’s recall of childhood attachments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 long-term effects of privation

A
  1. The cycle of privation - Quinton et al (1984)
  2. Reactive Attachment Disorder - Parker & Forest (1993)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Effects of privation: 1. The cycle of privation

A

Some studies suggest that children who experience privation go on to have difficulties caring for their own children.

(Quinton et al support)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

RESEARCH SUPPORT for the cycle of privation

A

Quinton et al (1984) compared 50 women who had experienced institutional care as children w 50 women who hadn’t. They found that the women who had been raised in institutions were more likely to have parenting difficulties later in life. Suggests there is a cycle of privation - children who experienced privation later become less caring parents.

Therefore, their children are deprived of a strong maternal attachment & may then be less caring to their children.

17
Q

Effects of privation: 2. Reactive Attachment Disorder

A

Parker & Forest (1993) outlined this rare but serious condition, occurs in children who have been permanently damaged by early experiences sa privation of attachment. Symptoms include:
1. inability to give/receive affection
2. dishonesty
3. poor social relationships
4. involvement in crime

18
Q

BUT, who showed that privation may not necessarily lead to detrimental outcomes

A

Freud & Dann (1951)

19
Q

What did Freud & Dann (1951) find

A

Freud & Dann (1951) studied 6 children who were rescued after WWII. They had been orphaned during war at few months old, raised in deportation camp. Although looked after by Jewish ppl ‘passing through’ to concentration camps, children didn’t have time to form any adult attachments, instead forming bonds amongst themselves.

When war ended, children were adopted by British families & have since shown few signs of a troubled upbringing, having a normal level of intelligence & maintaining normal relationships.