Week 2: Personality Psyc Flashcards

1
Q

the 3 levels of Personality

A

lvls:

1) dispositional traits
2) characteristic Adaptations
3) life narratives

they are hierarchical (3 is the highest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1) Dispositional traits

A
  • broad descriptions of patterns of behavior and experience

-relatively decontextualised
as it arises from v. broad classes of stimuli and situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dispositional traits:

Allport and Odbert (1936)

A

they have a Lexical Hypothesis:
impt chars coded in language.
18k descriptors

Prob: v. unwieldy, a list rather than a system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cattell (1943):
reduced Odbert’s list to Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors (traits)
Precedure

A

1) 18,000 descriptors
2) Sorted into 160 clusters of synonyms/antonyms
3) Discarding near-identical descriptors
4) Final list of 171 descriptors
5) 100 participants rate 1-2 friends on the 171 descriptors
6) Factor Analysis
7) 16 Personality Factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dispositional Traits:
content
strengths
limitations

A

content) Broad, coherent patterns of behaviour and experience
strength) Universal structure, high predictive value
limitation) Lowest resolution description of a person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Problems with Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors

A

1) Subjectivity
2) Poor Replicability / Reproducibility
3) Redundancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Problems with Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors

1) Subjectivity &
2) Poor Replicability / Reproducibility

A

Different people reach a different reduced set of Allport
& Odbert’s descriptors
cannot obtain the same set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Problems with Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors

3) Redundancy

A

Many of his factors correlated too highly for them to really be ‘different’ traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Digman, 1990 created:

The Big Five

A

1) Extraversion
2) agreeableness
3) conscientiousness
4) Neuroticism
5) openness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hierarchical Structure of Traits

A

1) Nuances (very narrow: liking something)
2) Facets (energy lvl. + emotions)
3) Aspects (enthusiasm)
4) Domains (big 5)
5) Meta-traits (stability, plasticity: v. broad)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Big 5 themes are?

3

A

1) Interpersonal responses
2) Responses to achievement settings
3) Emotional responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Interpersonal responses

A

An extraverted person is
— Bold and assertive
— Talkative and sociable

An agreeable person is
— Kind, warmhearted, caring
— Cooperative and trusting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Responses to achievement settings

A

A conscientious person…
— finishing things, doing things properly, being thorough, precise and careful

A neurotic person…
— reflect anxiety,
worry about getting things wrong, messing things up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Emotional responses

A

An extraverted person…
— Experiences positive affect and energy

A more neurotic person…
— Experiences worry and mood swings

An open person…
— Experiences interest and curiosity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Measurements of B5:
Questionnaires:
3 methods used to Estimate Reliability

A

Temporal stability
1) Test-retest reliability
(Correlation between T1 score and T2 score)

Internal consistency
2) Split-half reliability 
(Correlation between scores: half & half)
3) Cronbach's Alpha
(Average of all possible split halves)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Measurements of B5:
Questionnaires:
3 methods used to for validity

A
1) Face validity
(appear valid)
2) Content validity
(relevant content: judge by experts)
3) Criterion-related validity
(sensible correlations with other valid measures)
17
Q

Test-retest reliability:

rationale and caveat

A

R: repeated measure: easy to verify the score

C: not applicable to all psychological phenomena (eg: states: changes more)

18
Q

Cronbach’s Alpha:

A

widely reported measure of reliability

> 0.6 to be considered reliable

19
Q

Criterion-related validity:

1.Concurrent validity

A

Concurrent validity:
2 aspects:
Convergent validity: correlate significantly with related measures?
Divergent validity: weak or zero correlations with unrelated measures

20
Q

Criterion-related validity:

2.Predictive validity

A

predict expected outcomes, or behaviours

21
Q

Caveat of validity of B5

A

Big Five were empirically derived (i.e., without a guiding theory)

Stronger emphasis on predictive validity

but not for the the new BFI-2

22
Q

The scope and limits of traits

A

its not all aspects of personality

Traits are generic descriptors, and relatively decontextualised

personality can be v. contextualised.

23
Q

Characteristic Adaptations’ conceptualizations

A
Both are specific to an individual
McAdams & Pals, 2006:
time - stages of life
place - Specific Situations
Role - Function / Duty

DeYoung, 2015:
stable goals - Desired future states
interpretations - appraised current states
strategies - plans and actions to move between states

24
Q

Life Narratives:
content
strengths
limitations

A

content) Personal Story, unity and purpose of self
strength) Highest resolution description of a person

Limitation) no predictive value

25
Q

To study life narratives using interview focus on:

A

1) 8 key events in your life
2) Significant people
3) The future script
4) Stresses and problems
5) Personal ideology
6) Life theme

26
Q

when we study life narratives, the focus of content analyses are ______, _________ and ______.

A
Tone (+/-)
Themes and (preoccupations w certain prob)
Form (stability/change, slow/fast)
27
Q

Characteristic Adaptations:
content
strengths
limitations

A

content) Goals, interpretations, strategies
strength) Captures individual circumstances

Limitation) Unclear scope and structure