5) Distribution Flashcards

1
Q

specific devise: def

A

gift of specific item of property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

demonstrative devise: def

A

gift of a general nature, coming from a specific source ($100,000 from the sale of the house)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

general devise: def

A

satisfied out of general assets of the estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

residuary devise: def

A

anything not passing under one of the general provisions of the will –> goes to residuary beneficiaries (to avoid intestacy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

intestate devise: def

A

devise through the laws of intestacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ways property can change

A

1) ademption
2) satisfaction
3) increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ademption by extinction: def

A
  • -specific devise only
  • -at time of death, estate no longer contains that specific item
  • -result: it gets adeemed (cancelled)
  • -intent not a factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

partial ademption?

A

is possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ademption in CA

A

CA favors NONademption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ways courts try to find a way around ademption

A

1) insurance proceeds, unpaid condemntaiton award, or purchase price to devisee
2) classify the devise as something other than a specific devise
3) construe clause at time of death, rather than execution
4) viewing as non-substantial change in form (stocks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

satisfaction: def

A

will has gift to devisee, but after the will and prior to death, the testator makes inter vivos gift to devisee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

satisfaction: rule

A

the gift will ONLY satisfy if one of these:

1) will says so, or
2) writing signed by testator or beneficiary says this is meant to be satisfaction
3) other extrinsic evidence shows meant to be satisfaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

advancement: def

A

like satisfaction, but for intestate shares

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

advancement: rule

A

it’s only advancement if:

1) decedent declared in writing OR heir ack’d in writing that the gift was an advancement, and
2) writing/ack must indicate that gift is to be taken into account when contributing amount to be distributed (otherwise it’s just a gift)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

increases: between execution and death

A

1) any increase does not go to the devisee –> becomes part of estate
2) stock: if specific devise of stock the specific increase DOES go to that devisee (exception)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

increases: between death and distribution

A

specific devisee gets those increases

general or demonstrative generally no

17
Q

abatement: def

A

gifts are reduced under the will to satisfy the debts and claims of the estate

18
Q

order of abatement

A

1) property that would pass by intestacy
2) residuary
3) general
4) demonstrative
5) specific

19
Q

order of abatement: general principles

A

(reverse specificity – group by group, pro rata within group–no special for spouse). Will can change it

20
Q

exoneration: CA rule

A

specific gift passes the property SUBJECT TO the mortgage. NO exoneration!

21
Q

exoneration: def

A

if the estate were to pay off the mortgage first (but doesn’t happen in CA)

22
Q

changes to people: kinds

A

1) lapse + anti-lapse
2) slayer statute
3) disclaimer

23
Q

lapse: def

A

if the beneficiary predecases the testator, gift will lapse

24
Q

lapse: simultaneous death

A

need clear + convincing evidence that one person survived the other by 120 hours. Otherwise, deemed to have predeceased

25
Q

lapse: anti-lapse statute:

A

UNLESS there is a contrary intent in the will, gift to a deceased benefiary passes to the issue of the beneficiary

ONLY applies to save a gift to certain ppl…

applies to class gifts too.

26
Q

anti-lapse statute: applies to who?

A

1) relatives of decedent OR

2) decedent’s surviving, deceased, or former spouse

27
Q

slayer statute: def

A

if feloniously and intentionalyl kill the decedent, can’t get from will/trust/intestate

28
Q

disclaimer: def

A

beneficiary can refuse a gift under a will by disclaiming, partially or totally.

irrevocable

29
Q

disclaimer requirements:

A

1) in writing
2) signed by intended beneficiary
3) identify: creator of interest, what’s being disclaimed, state the disclaimer, extent of the disclaimer.

30
Q

disclaimer results

A

beneficiary treated as if predeceased the testator

anti-lapse may apply