Post-Structuralism Flashcards

1
Q

the heart of the difference between structuralism and poststructuralism.

A

Language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Logocentrism

A

The trust in the combination of presence and language. Presences is the bases of the las piece of true language that one has and language allows one to convey that knowledge to the outside world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discourse

A

Social language that take place in a particular historical moment, that is made of a number of ideologies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the bottom language of discourse.

A

Power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Meaning is the product of

A

Difference and it is also always subject to a process of deferral difference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True meaning is always

A

Deferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Setting up a centre automatically creates

A

a hierarchical structure: the central is more important than the marginal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Deconstruction

A

undertakes to bring to light the tensions between the central and the marginal text.
Meaning that we take the text, the center of the text there is an ideology that is dominant, and in the margins of the text there are the forms of resistance.
We criticize the center ideology (or dominant ideology) in order to contemplate the periphery ideologies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The oppositional term is a condition for subversion: to analyze and dismantle binary oppositions

A

means to decentre the priviledge term, to show that both terms only exist because of the difference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deconstruction

A

Examines the ways in which our experience is determined by ideologies of which we are unaware because they are “built into” our language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

language is not the reliable tool of communication we believe it to be, but rather a… (Derrida)

A

… but rather a fluid, ambiguous domain of complex experience in which ideologies program us without our being aware of them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What structuralism calls the signified is

A

a chain of signifiers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

language is nonreferential, structuralism explanation

A

because it doesn’t refer to things in the world but only to our concepts of things in the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Language is nonreferential, post-structuralism explanation

A

it refers neither to things in the world nor to our concepts of things but only to the play of signifiers of which language itself consists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 characteristics of language

A

(1) its play of signifiers continually defers, or postpones, meaning, and (2) the meaning it seems to have is the result of the differences by which we distinguish one signifier from another. He combines the French words for “to defer” and “to differ” to coin the word différance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The only meaning language can have

A

Différance

17
Q

Bricolage

A

Stretch language into new forms of thinking

18
Q

language is wholly ideological

A

it consists entirely of the numerous conflicting, dynamic ideologies—or systems of beliefs and values—operating at any given point in time in any given culture.

19
Q

Difference of binary oppositions between structuralism and deconstructivism

A

Deconstructivism analyzes binary oppositions through heriarchies. That is, one term in the pair is always privileged, or considered superior to the other.

20
Q

Language is constantly overflowing with implications, associations, and contradictions that reflect the implications, associations, and contra‑ dictions of the ideologies of which it is formed.

A

Yes

21
Q

Because it is through language that a culture’s

A

Ideologies are passed on

22
Q

Ground of being of the culture

A

Language, but that ground is not out of play: it is itself as dynamic, evolving, problematical

23
Q

Logocentrism

A

the concepts themselves remain stable; it places at the center (centric) of its understanding of the world a concept (logos) that organizes and explains the world for us while remaining outside of the world it organizes and explains. Western philoshophy’s greatest illusion.

24
Q

no concept is beyond

A

the dynamic instability of language, which disseminates (as a flower scatters its seeds on the wind) an infinite number of possible meanings with each written or spoken utterance.

25
Q

discourse

A

an infinite number of vantage points from which to view the existence, and each of these vantage points has a language of its own,

26
Q

Conception (what we think) precedes

A

perception (what we experience through our senses) and how our expectations, beliefs, and values determine the way we experience our world.

27
Q

if language is the ground of being, then the world

A

is infinite text, that is, an infinite chain of signifiers always in play.

28
Q

Because human beings are constituted by language

A

they, too, are texts.

29
Q

The self‑image of a stable identity that many of us have is really

A

just a comforting self‑delusion, which we produce in collusion with our culture, for culture, too, wants to see itself as stable and coherent when in reality it is highly unstable and fragmented.

30
Q

We dont have an identity because

A

the word identity implies that we consist of one, singular self, but in fact we are multiple and fragmented, consisting at any moment of any number of conflicting beliefs, desires, fears, anxieties, and intentions.

31
Q

In literature, meaning is created by

A

the reader in the act of reading

32
Q

Two main purposes in deconstructing a literary text

A

(1) to reveal the text’s undecidability and/or (2) to reveal the complex operations of the ideologies of which the text is constructed.