Experimental Design Flashcards

1
Q

Define the key term ‘Experimental Design’.

A

The different ways in which testing of PPs can be organised in an experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define the key term ‘Independent Groups Design’.

A

PPs are allocated to different groups, where each group represents 1 experimental condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define the key term ‘Repeated Measures’.

A

All participants take part in all conditions of the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the key term ‘Matched Pairs Design’.

A

Pairs of participants are matched on a variable that may affect the DV.
Then one participant is put into Condition A, the other into Condition B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define the key term ‘Random Allocation’.

A

A way of controlling participant variables in an IGs design, ensuring every participant is equally likely to be placed in each condition of the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define the key term ‘Counterbalancing’.

A

A way of controlling the effects of order in a RMs design, where 50% of PPs experience conditions in one order, and the other 50% of PPs experience conditions in the reverse order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How would you allocate participants in an Independent Groups Design?

A

Place half into Condition A and half into Condition B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How would you allocate participants in a Repeated Measures Design?

A

Put all participants through Condition A first, and then Condition B later on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How would you allocate participants in a Matched Pairs Design?

A

Match pairs based on IQ.

Put 1 into Condition A and the other into Condition B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluate the Independent Groups design.

A

Benefits:
• PP less likely to guess aims of study - reduced demand characteristics
• Order effects aren’t a problem

Negatives:
• PP in the different groups aren’t the same - differences in DV may be due to individual differences, not changes in the IV
• Less economic than repeated measures - each PP gives only 1 result. 2x as many PP would be needed for IG than RM to produce the same amount of data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate the Repeated Measures design.

A

Benefits:
• Control over PP variables
• Less PP needed so more economical

Negatives:
• Order effects - each PP does at least 2 tasks
e.g. drinking energy drink first can have a continuing effect when drinking water afterwards
• Order effects arise bc repeating 2 tasks could create boredom and thus deterioration in the second performance
• Order effects could cause performance to improve e.g. on skill-based tasks
• More likely PP will work out aim of study when experiencing all conditions of experiment - higher chance of demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluate the Matched Pairs design.

A

Benefits:
• PP take part in only 1 condition so order effects + demand characteristics aren’t a problem

Disadvantages:
• PP aren’t matched exactly - there may still be important differences which would affect the DV
• Matching is time-consuming and expensive - least economical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly